Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations: Application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania)
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 41, 11.2014, p. 408-422.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations
T2 - Application of a photo-based Q-method in Transylvania (Central Romania)
AU - Milcu, Andra Ioana
AU - Sherren, Kate
AU - Hanspach, Jan
AU - Abson, David
AU - Fischer, Joern
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - In combination, the economic realities brought about by globalization, and the sustainability goals set by the European Union, translate into contradictory challenges for European cultural landscapes. With its high natural and cultural diversity, Transylvania (Central Romania) is facing the choice between development based on a "production for profit" logic, with the risks of a liberalized land market, versus a largely untested development pathway based on sustainability, landscape multifunctionality and conservation. In the context of these largely externally imposed and contradictory development pathways, clarifying the viewpoints and preferences of local people is important, and may help explain the outcomes of past policies, as well as inform future interventions. We undertook a photograph-based Q methodology study - interviewing 129 residents from 30 villages - to understand and explore the diverse range of landscape preferences held by locals in Southern Transylvania. We clarified these preferences by identifying groups of participants who shared similar viewpoints regarding local landscapes and their changing purpose. Our findings revealed five different "preference narratives" about Transylvanian landscapes, namely (1) landscapes for prosperity and economic growth; (2) landscapes for traditions and balanced lifestyles; (3) landscapes for human benefit; (4) landscapes for farming; and (5) landscapes for nature. Our systematic assessment of narratives showed areas of consensus and disagreement among participants. We relate the five preference narratives to current management approaches targeting rural landscapes. We conclude by suggesting policy approaches to tackle the diversity of opinions and interests found in this culturally and ecologically diverse landscape. Important policy priorities include fostering economic diversification and improving social capital.
AB - In combination, the economic realities brought about by globalization, and the sustainability goals set by the European Union, translate into contradictory challenges for European cultural landscapes. With its high natural and cultural diversity, Transylvania (Central Romania) is facing the choice between development based on a "production for profit" logic, with the risks of a liberalized land market, versus a largely untested development pathway based on sustainability, landscape multifunctionality and conservation. In the context of these largely externally imposed and contradictory development pathways, clarifying the viewpoints and preferences of local people is important, and may help explain the outcomes of past policies, as well as inform future interventions. We undertook a photograph-based Q methodology study - interviewing 129 residents from 30 villages - to understand and explore the diverse range of landscape preferences held by locals in Southern Transylvania. We clarified these preferences by identifying groups of participants who shared similar viewpoints regarding local landscapes and their changing purpose. Our findings revealed five different "preference narratives" about Transylvanian landscapes, namely (1) landscapes for prosperity and economic growth; (2) landscapes for traditions and balanced lifestyles; (3) landscapes for human benefit; (4) landscapes for farming; and (5) landscapes for nature. Our systematic assessment of narratives showed areas of consensus and disagreement among participants. We relate the five preference narratives to current management approaches targeting rural landscapes. We conclude by suggesting policy approaches to tackle the diversity of opinions and interests found in this culturally and ecologically diverse landscape. Important policy priorities include fostering economic diversification and improving social capital.
KW - Environmental planning
KW - Cultural landscape
KW - Landscape preference
KW - Modernization
KW - Multifunctional
KW - Q methodology
KW - Tradition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904727349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/92ea9ccc-1a16-3b17-b431-d0adffc3212e/
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.019
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.019
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:84904727349
VL - 41
SP - 408
EP - 422
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
SN - 0264-8377
ER -