Misconceptions of Measurement Equivalence: Time for a Paradigm Shift
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 49, No. 8, 01.07.2016, p. 1068-1094.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Misconceptions of Measurement Equivalence
T2 - Time for a Paradigm Shift
AU - Welzel, Christian
AU - Inglehart, Ronald F.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Structural equation modelers judge multi-item constructs against three requirements: (a) multiple items converge in a single dimension; (b) individual-level patterns of item convergence are invariant across countries; (c) aggregate-level patterns of item convergence replicate those at the individual level. This approach involves two premises: Measurement validity hinges solely on a construct's internal convergence, and convergence patterns at the individual level have priority over those at the aggregate level. We question both premises (a) because convergence patterns at the aggregate-level exist in their own right and (b) because only a construct's external linkages reveal its reality outreach. In support of these claims, we use the example of emancipative values to show that constructs can entirely lack convergence at the individual level and nevertheless exhibit powerful and important linkages at the aggregate level. Consequently, we advocate a paradigm shift from internal convergence toward external linkage as the prime criterion of validity.
AB - Structural equation modelers judge multi-item constructs against three requirements: (a) multiple items converge in a single dimension; (b) individual-level patterns of item convergence are invariant across countries; (c) aggregate-level patterns of item convergence replicate those at the individual level. This approach involves two premises: Measurement validity hinges solely on a construct's internal convergence, and convergence patterns at the individual level have priority over those at the aggregate level. We question both premises (a) because convergence patterns at the aggregate-level exist in their own right and (b) because only a construct's external linkages reveal its reality outreach. In support of these claims, we use the example of emancipative values to show that constructs can entirely lack convergence at the individual level and nevertheless exhibit powerful and important linkages at the aggregate level. Consequently, we advocate a paradigm shift from internal convergence toward external linkage as the prime criterion of validity.
KW - quantitative methods
KW - political psychology
KW - validity
KW - equivalence
KW - emancipative values
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979018723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0010414016628275
DO - 10.1177/0010414016628275
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 49
SP - 1068
EP - 1094
JO - Comparative Political Studies
JF - Comparative Political Studies
SN - 0010-4140
IS - 8
ER -