Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

Standard

Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation. / Puchta, Claudia; Potter, Jonathan.
In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.09.2002, p. 345-363.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6e5ec34d10804e1c917ed6df26c03a63,
title = "Manufacturing individual opinions: Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation",
abstract = "This article addresses a paradox. On the one hand, discourse and rhetorical studies have provided evidence that evaluative talk is both variable and rhetorically organized. On the other hand, a wide range of social psychological research is produced that both presupposes and finds evidence of enduring underlying attitudes. One explanation for this may be that, on some occasions at least, the results of attitude research are a consequence of procedures that restrict and refine from everyday evaluative practices in a way that ensures the {\textquoteleft}discovery{\textquoteright} of underlying attitudes. The article explores this explanation in one domain where there is a major practical concern with attitudes and opinions, namely market research focus groups. Detailed analysis of transcripts of eight market research focus groups identifies three procedures that moderators use to produce freestanding opinion packages: (a) they display rhetorically embedded evaluations as inconsequential; (b) they provide formal guidance for participants to produce freestanding opinions; and (c) they formulate participants' talk as freestanding opinions, stripping off rhetorical elements. The findings are supported by considering deviant cases. This illustrates one way in which evaluations are transformed into freestanding attitudes. More broadly, it contributes to a body of work that studies how social science methods work in practice",
keywords = "Business psychology",
author = "Claudia Puchta and Jonathan Potter",
year = "2002",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1348/014466602760344250",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "345--363",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "2044-8295",
publisher = "The British Psychological Society",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manufacturing individual opinions

T2 - Market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of evaluation

AU - Puchta, Claudia

AU - Potter, Jonathan

PY - 2002/9/1

Y1 - 2002/9/1

N2 - This article addresses a paradox. On the one hand, discourse and rhetorical studies have provided evidence that evaluative talk is both variable and rhetorically organized. On the other hand, a wide range of social psychological research is produced that both presupposes and finds evidence of enduring underlying attitudes. One explanation for this may be that, on some occasions at least, the results of attitude research are a consequence of procedures that restrict and refine from everyday evaluative practices in a way that ensures the ‘discovery’ of underlying attitudes. The article explores this explanation in one domain where there is a major practical concern with attitudes and opinions, namely market research focus groups. Detailed analysis of transcripts of eight market research focus groups identifies three procedures that moderators use to produce freestanding opinion packages: (a) they display rhetorically embedded evaluations as inconsequential; (b) they provide formal guidance for participants to produce freestanding opinions; and (c) they formulate participants' talk as freestanding opinions, stripping off rhetorical elements. The findings are supported by considering deviant cases. This illustrates one way in which evaluations are transformed into freestanding attitudes. More broadly, it contributes to a body of work that studies how social science methods work in practice

AB - This article addresses a paradox. On the one hand, discourse and rhetorical studies have provided evidence that evaluative talk is both variable and rhetorically organized. On the other hand, a wide range of social psychological research is produced that both presupposes and finds evidence of enduring underlying attitudes. One explanation for this may be that, on some occasions at least, the results of attitude research are a consequence of procedures that restrict and refine from everyday evaluative practices in a way that ensures the ‘discovery’ of underlying attitudes. The article explores this explanation in one domain where there is a major practical concern with attitudes and opinions, namely market research focus groups. Detailed analysis of transcripts of eight market research focus groups identifies three procedures that moderators use to produce freestanding opinion packages: (a) they display rhetorically embedded evaluations as inconsequential; (b) they provide formal guidance for participants to produce freestanding opinions; and (c) they formulate participants' talk as freestanding opinions, stripping off rhetorical elements. The findings are supported by considering deviant cases. This illustrates one way in which evaluations are transformed into freestanding attitudes. More broadly, it contributes to a body of work that studies how social science methods work in practice

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036727779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1348/014466602760344250

DO - 10.1348/014466602760344250

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 41

SP - 345

EP - 363

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 2044-8295

IS - 3

ER -