Late developers and the inequity of "equitable utilization" and the harm of "do no harm"

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Late developers and the inequity of "equitable utilization" and the harm of "do no harm". / Wegerich, K.; Olsson, O.

In: Water International, Vol. 35, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 707-717.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{fe002ccf3a7c4f7fa6e55f436aee5db1,
title = "Late developers and the inequity of {"}equitable utilization{"} and the harm of {"}do no harm{"}",
abstract = "This paper critically examines the Helsinki Rules (1966), the United Nations Convention (1997) and the Berlin Rules (2004), looking at their emphasis on the principle either of equitable utilization or of doing no harm and analysing the effect of these principles on late developers within a river basin. The analysis reveals that these rules increasingly favour first developers. Today, late developers have even less incentive to subscribe to these rules, but instead must either utilize their own dominance or have a powerful ally to develop their water resources. Given the Millennium Development Goals, the existing recommendations on the sharing of international rivers should be revised so as not to favour the early developers.",
keywords = "Chemistry, Equitable utilization, International water law/rules, Late developer, No harm, Transboundary rivers",
author = "K. Wegerich and O. Olsson",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1080/02508060.2010.533345",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "707--717",
journal = "Water International",
issn = "0250-8060",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Late developers and the inequity of "equitable utilization" and the harm of "do no harm"

AU - Wegerich, K.

AU - Olsson, O.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - This paper critically examines the Helsinki Rules (1966), the United Nations Convention (1997) and the Berlin Rules (2004), looking at their emphasis on the principle either of equitable utilization or of doing no harm and analysing the effect of these principles on late developers within a river basin. The analysis reveals that these rules increasingly favour first developers. Today, late developers have even less incentive to subscribe to these rules, but instead must either utilize their own dominance or have a powerful ally to develop their water resources. Given the Millennium Development Goals, the existing recommendations on the sharing of international rivers should be revised so as not to favour the early developers.

AB - This paper critically examines the Helsinki Rules (1966), the United Nations Convention (1997) and the Berlin Rules (2004), looking at their emphasis on the principle either of equitable utilization or of doing no harm and analysing the effect of these principles on late developers within a river basin. The analysis reveals that these rules increasingly favour first developers. Today, late developers have even less incentive to subscribe to these rules, but instead must either utilize their own dominance or have a powerful ally to develop their water resources. Given the Millennium Development Goals, the existing recommendations on the sharing of international rivers should be revised so as not to favour the early developers.

KW - Chemistry

KW - Equitable utilization

KW - International water law/rules

KW - Late developer

KW - No harm

KW - Transboundary rivers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649733230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02508060.2010.533345

DO - 10.1080/02508060.2010.533345

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 35

SP - 707

EP - 717

JO - Water International

JF - Water International

SN - 0250-8060

IS - 6

ER -