Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Patricia Balvanera
  • Tim M. Daw
  • Toby A. Gardner
  • Berta Martín-López
  • Albert V. Norström
  • Chinwe Ifejika Speranza
  • Marja Spierenburg
  • Elena M. Bennett
  • Michelle Farfan
  • Maike Hamann
  • John N. Kittinger
  • Tobias Luthe
  • Manuel Maass
  • Garry D. Peterson
  • Gustavo Perez-Verdin
The emerging discipline of sustainability science is focused explicitly on the dynamic interactions between nature and society and is committed to research that spans multiple scales and can support transitions toward greater sustainability. Because a growing body of place-based social-ecological sustainability research (PBSESR) has emerged in recent decades, there is a growing need to understand better how to maximize the effectiveness of this work. The Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) provides a unique opportunity for synthesizing insights gained from this research community on key features that may contribute to the relative success of PBSESR. We surveyed the leaders of PECS-affiliated projects using a combination of open, closed, and semistructured questions to identify which features of a research project are perceived to contribute to successful research design and implementation. We assessed six types of research features: problem orientation, research team, and contextual, conceptual, methodological, and evaluative features. We examined the desirable and undesirable aspects of each feature, the enabling factors and obstacles associated with project implementation, and asked respondents to assess the performance of their own projects in relation to these features. Responses were obtained from 25 projects working in 42 social-ecological study cases within 25 countries. Factors that contribute to the overall success of PBSESR included: explicitly addressing integrated social-ecological systems; a focus on solution- and transformation-oriented research; adaptation of studies to their local context; trusted, long-term, and frequent engagement with stakeholders and partners; and an early definition of the purpose and scope of research. Factors that hindered the success of PBSESR included: the complexities inherent to social-ecological systems, the imposition of particular epistemologies and methods on the wider research group, the need for long periods of time to initiate and conduct this kind of research, and power asymmetries both within the research team and among stakeholders. In the self-assessment exercise, performance relating to team and context-related features was ranked higher than performance relating to methodological, evaluation, and problem orientation features. We discuss how these insights are relevant for balancing place-based and global perspectives in sustainability science, fostering more rapid progress toward inter- and transdisciplinary integration, redefining and measuring the success of PBSESR, and facing the challenges of academic and research funding institutions. These results highlight the valuable opportunity that the PECS community provides in helping build a community of practice for PBSESR.
Original languageEnglish
Article number14
JournalEcology and Society
Volume22
Issue number1
Number of pages45
ISSN1708-3087
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the author(s).

    Research areas

  • Sustainability Science - interdisciplinarity, PECS, solutions, stakeholders, transdisciplinarity, transformations

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. EUROCALL Conference: Exploring different collaboration formats for teacher professional development in international Virtual Exchange; co-presenters: Euline Cutrim Schmid & Anna Wärnsby
  2. My vision for 100 years of Irish-German diplomatic relations – in 100 seconds (Irish-German diplomatic relations – towards the 100th anniversary)
  3. 30. DGFF Kongress: „Paving New Ways for Student Mobility in Teacher Education – Students’ Perspectives on a Blended Intensive Programme”; co-presenter: Robert O’Dowd
  4. European Sociological Association (ESA) (Externe Organisation)
  5. Treffen des Netzwerks Jungewissenschaft Sozialdidaktik / Didaktik der Sozialpädagogik 2023 (Veranstaltung)
  6. BNE-Netzwerk der Region Lüneburg (Externe Organisation)
  7. Die (sub)politische Ethik des Beruflichen in der beruflichen Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung
  8. EUROCALL Conference: "Du hast eine Hand verloren.”, “Yeah that happened before.” – Investigating situated language in SVR; co-presenters: Breffni O'Rourke; Gillian Martin
  9. World Bank Conference "Female Entrepreneurship: Constrains and Opportunities"
  10. 7. General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research - ECPR 2013
  11. Borderline Poetry: 20 years of German Unification as seen through Berlin literature
  12. Konsultation der Bundesweiten Koalition Kulturelle Vielfalt 2017
  13. Migration und soziale Arbeit (Fachzeitschrift)
  14. Fachtag des Arbeitskreises Migration Kreis Steinburg zum Thema AUSBILDUNG
  15. Jahresevent Alpen-Kulinarik 2011
  16. Fakultät Bildung (Organisation)
  17. „Also, das habe ich dann auch von mir heraus gemacht, und das mache ich auch ganz oft so, jetzt im Studium.“ Zwischen Distinktionsprofit und Defizitzuschreibung: Hybride Sprachpraxen an der Hochschule in der Perspektive Studierender
  18. 2. Österreichischer Tag der Politikwissenschaft 2012
  19. Kognitive Aktivierung im Hauptschulunterricht: erste Ergebnisse einer Video- und Fragebogenstudie