Introducing split orders and optimizing operational policies in robotic mobile fulfillment systems

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Introducing split orders and optimizing operational policies in robotic mobile fulfillment systems. / Xie, Lin; Thieme, Nils ; Krenzler, Ruslan et al.
In: European Journal of Operational Research , Vol. 288, No. 1, 01.01.2021, p. 80-97.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{799eabaf919445d898b02e6fdca9a3b9,
title = "Introducing split orders and optimizing operational policies in robotic mobile fulfillment systems",
abstract = "In robotic mobile fulfillment systems, human pickers don{\textquoteright}t go to the inventory area to search for and pick the ordered items. Instead, robots carry shelves (called “pods”) containing ordered items from the inventory area to picking stations. At the picking stations, pickers put ordered items into totes; then these items are transported to the packing stations. This type of warehousing system relieves the human pickers and improves the picking process. In this paper, we concentrate on decisions about the assignment of pods to stations and orders to stations to fulfill picking for each incoming customer{\textquoteright}s order. In previous research for an RMFS with multiple picking stations, these decisions are made sequentially with heuristics. Instead, we present a new MIP-model to integrate both decision problems. To improve the system performance even more, we extend our model by splitting orders. This means parts of an order are allowed to be picked at different stations. To the best of the authors{\textquoteright} knowledge, this is the first publication on split orders in an RMFS. And we prove the computational complexity of our models. We analyze different performance metrics, such as pile-on, pod-station visits, robot moving distance and throughput. We compare the results of our models in different instances with the sequential method in our open-source simulation framework RAWSim-O. The integration of the decisions brings better performances, and allowing split orders further improves the performances (for example: increasing throughput by 46%). In order to reduce the computational time for a real-world application, we have proposed a heuristic.",
keywords = "Business informatics, logistics, MIP models, Integrated operational optimization, Robotic mobile fulfillment systems, Split orders",
author = "Lin Xie and Nils Thieme and Ruslan Krenzler and Hanyi Li",
note = "The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. Nils Thieme and Ruslan Krenzler are funded by the industrial project “Robotic Mobile Fulfillment System”, which is financially supported by Ecopti GmbH (Paderborn, Germany) and Beijing Hanning Tech Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). We would like to thank the Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing for providing their clusters for our numerical experiments. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Author(s)",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.032",
language = "English",
volume = "288",
pages = "80--97",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research ",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing split orders and optimizing operational policies in robotic mobile fulfillment systems

AU - Xie, Lin

AU - Thieme, Nils

AU - Krenzler, Ruslan

AU - Li, Hanyi

N1 - The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. Nils Thieme and Ruslan Krenzler are funded by the industrial project “Robotic Mobile Fulfillment System”, which is financially supported by Ecopti GmbH (Paderborn, Germany) and Beijing Hanning Tech Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). We would like to thank the Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing for providing their clusters for our numerical experiments. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - In robotic mobile fulfillment systems, human pickers don’t go to the inventory area to search for and pick the ordered items. Instead, robots carry shelves (called “pods”) containing ordered items from the inventory area to picking stations. At the picking stations, pickers put ordered items into totes; then these items are transported to the packing stations. This type of warehousing system relieves the human pickers and improves the picking process. In this paper, we concentrate on decisions about the assignment of pods to stations and orders to stations to fulfill picking for each incoming customer’s order. In previous research for an RMFS with multiple picking stations, these decisions are made sequentially with heuristics. Instead, we present a new MIP-model to integrate both decision problems. To improve the system performance even more, we extend our model by splitting orders. This means parts of an order are allowed to be picked at different stations. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first publication on split orders in an RMFS. And we prove the computational complexity of our models. We analyze different performance metrics, such as pile-on, pod-station visits, robot moving distance and throughput. We compare the results of our models in different instances with the sequential method in our open-source simulation framework RAWSim-O. The integration of the decisions brings better performances, and allowing split orders further improves the performances (for example: increasing throughput by 46%). In order to reduce the computational time for a real-world application, we have proposed a heuristic.

AB - In robotic mobile fulfillment systems, human pickers don’t go to the inventory area to search for and pick the ordered items. Instead, robots carry shelves (called “pods”) containing ordered items from the inventory area to picking stations. At the picking stations, pickers put ordered items into totes; then these items are transported to the packing stations. This type of warehousing system relieves the human pickers and improves the picking process. In this paper, we concentrate on decisions about the assignment of pods to stations and orders to stations to fulfill picking for each incoming customer’s order. In previous research for an RMFS with multiple picking stations, these decisions are made sequentially with heuristics. Instead, we present a new MIP-model to integrate both decision problems. To improve the system performance even more, we extend our model by splitting orders. This means parts of an order are allowed to be picked at different stations. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first publication on split orders in an RMFS. And we prove the computational complexity of our models. We analyze different performance metrics, such as pile-on, pod-station visits, robot moving distance and throughput. We compare the results of our models in different instances with the sequential method in our open-source simulation framework RAWSim-O. The integration of the decisions brings better performances, and allowing split orders further improves the performances (for example: increasing throughput by 46%). In order to reduce the computational time for a real-world application, we have proposed a heuristic.

KW - Business informatics

KW - logistics

KW - MIP models

KW - Integrated operational optimization

KW - Robotic mobile fulfillment systems

KW - Split orders

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2cbdabf2-84fa-337b-a736-de601680430a/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.032

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.032

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 288

SP - 80

EP - 97

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Digital, open and collaborative: New teaching formats for times of crisis – and beyond?
  2. On Borders, Boundaries, Clouds, and Globalization. And on China.
  3. Effects of a seminar on mathematical modelling with MathCityMap
  4. Doing Away with Labor: Working and Caring in a World of Commons
  5. Methods of boundary work for inter- and transdisciplinary research.
  6. Comfort and Adaptive Cruise Control in Highly Automated Vehicles
  7. Memory Acts: Memory without Representation.: Theoretical and Methodological Suggestions
  8. 13th IWH-CIREQ Macroeconometric Workshop: Macro-econometrics and Panel Data - IWH-CIREQ 2012
  9. Knowledge-based views on Innovation: What's in it for schools?
  10. Reflexive Multi-Criteria Evaluation as a tool to integrate Multiple Values into Decision-Making – a Case Study from Germany
  11. Metacognitive Self-Reflection and Reading Diaries
  12. Sino-German Summer School on Design and data analysis of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments 2011
  13. Transition or Collapse? Conceptualizing Dynamics of Change
  14. Collecting Data from Archival Sources
  15. Structured Prediction in Social Contexts
  16. Center for Advanced Internet Studies GmbH
  17. From e-learning to the acquirement of competencies: wiki-based knowledge management and complex problem solving
  18. Life cycle thinking and systems thinking - how to support systems thinking in material flow management
  19. Modeling Self-Organization (3rd International Conference of the ESHS)
  20. Guidance on the application of in silico tools for Benign by Design
  21. MSc-Thesis: The effect of tree diversity on leaf damage and leaf shedding
  22. DCRLectures Summer Semester 2016
  23. Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: A methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies
  24. Sound is not the Score
  25. Types of institutional proxy representatives for future generations in democracies: A comparative empirical analysis