Individual differences and cognitive load theory

Jan L. Plass; Slava Kalyuga; Detlev Leutner

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

Individual differences and cognitive load theory

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Standard

Individual differences and cognitive load theory. / Plass, Jan L.; Kalyuga, Slava; Leutner, Detlev.
Cognitive Load Theory. ed. / Jan L. Plass; Roxana Moreno; Roland Brünken. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 65-88.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Harvard

Plass, JL, Kalyuga, S & Leutner, D 2010, Individual differences and cognitive load theory. in JL Plass, R Moreno & R Brünken (eds), Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

APA

Plass, J. L., Kalyuga, S., & Leutner, D. (2010). Individual differences and cognitive load theory. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 65-88). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

Vancouver

Plass JL, Kalyuga S, Leutner D. Individual differences and cognitive load theory. In Plass JL, Moreno R, Brünken R, editors, Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 65-88 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

Bibtex

@inbook{f9157a0ebb7c43af9815e7f23c411aa6,

title = "Individual differences and cognitive load theory",

abstract = "The previous chapters discussed sources of cognitive load that are a result of the difficulty of the materials, the design of instruction, and the amount of mental effort invested by learners to process the new information. As outlined in these chapters, the major cause of cognitive load effects is the limited capacity of working memory. In this chapter, we discuss how individual differences relate to the level of cognitive load that a particular learner experiences. Individual differences in learner characteristics take many different forms, ranging from preferences for learning from different presentation formats (e.g., verbal, pictorial) or modalities (auditory, visual, haptic) and preferences for learning under different environmental conditions (e.g., lighting, noise level, or physical position) to cognitive styles (e.g., field dependency/independency), cognitive abilities (e.g., verbal, spatial ability), and intelligence (Carroll, 1993; Jonassen & Grabowski, 1993). The influence of individual differences on learning has been studied for several decades as aptitude-treatment interactions (ATIs; Cronbach & Snow, 1977; Leutner, 1992; Lohman, 1986; Mayer, Stiehl, & Greeno, 1975; Plass, Chun, Mayer, & Leutner, 1998; Shute, 1992; Snow, 1989, 1994; Snow & Lohman, 1984, 1989). Aptitude-treatment interactions occur when different instructional treatment conditions result in differential learning outcomes depending on student aptitudes, in other words, when the effect of a given treatment is moderated by a given aptitude. Different aptitudes may influence learning in specific instructional environments, and the impact of a particular aptitude on a particular condition may only be observed for a particular type of learning outcome.",

keywords = "Psychology",

author = "Plass, {Jan L.} and Slava Kalyuga and Detlev Leutner",

year = "2010",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780521860239",

pages = "65--88",

editor = "Plass, {Jan L.} and Roxana Moreno and Roland Br{\"u}nken",

booktitle = "Cognitive Load Theory",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Individual differences and cognitive load theory

AU - Plass, Jan L.

AU - Kalyuga, Slava

AU - Leutner, Detlev

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The previous chapters discussed sources of cognitive load that are a result of the difficulty of the materials, the design of instruction, and the amount of mental effort invested by learners to process the new information. As outlined in these chapters, the major cause of cognitive load effects is the limited capacity of working memory. In this chapter, we discuss how individual differences relate to the level of cognitive load that a particular learner experiences. Individual differences in learner characteristics take many different forms, ranging from preferences for learning from different presentation formats (e.g., verbal, pictorial) or modalities (auditory, visual, haptic) and preferences for learning under different environmental conditions (e.g., lighting, noise level, or physical position) to cognitive styles (e.g., field dependency/independency), cognitive abilities (e.g., verbal, spatial ability), and intelligence (Carroll, 1993; Jonassen & Grabowski, 1993). The influence of individual differences on learning has been studied for several decades as aptitude-treatment interactions (ATIs; Cronbach & Snow, 1977; Leutner, 1992; Lohman, 1986; Mayer, Stiehl, & Greeno, 1975; Plass, Chun, Mayer, & Leutner, 1998; Shute, 1992; Snow, 1989, 1994; Snow & Lohman, 1984, 1989). Aptitude-treatment interactions occur when different instructional treatment conditions result in differential learning outcomes depending on student aptitudes, in other words, when the effect of a given treatment is moderated by a given aptitude. Different aptitudes may influence learning in specific instructional environments, and the impact of a particular aptitude on a particular condition may only be observed for a particular type of learning outcome.

AB - The previous chapters discussed sources of cognitive load that are a result of the difficulty of the materials, the design of instruction, and the amount of mental effort invested by learners to process the new information. As outlined in these chapters, the major cause of cognitive load effects is the limited capacity of working memory. In this chapter, we discuss how individual differences relate to the level of cognitive load that a particular learner experiences. Individual differences in learner characteristics take many different forms, ranging from preferences for learning from different presentation formats (e.g., verbal, pictorial) or modalities (auditory, visual, haptic) and preferences for learning under different environmental conditions (e.g., lighting, noise level, or physical position) to cognitive styles (e.g., field dependency/independency), cognitive abilities (e.g., verbal, spatial ability), and intelligence (Carroll, 1993; Jonassen & Grabowski, 1993). The influence of individual differences on learning has been studied for several decades as aptitude-treatment interactions (ATIs; Cronbach & Snow, 1977; Leutner, 1992; Lohman, 1986; Mayer, Stiehl, & Greeno, 1975; Plass, Chun, Mayer, & Leutner, 1998; Shute, 1992; Snow, 1989, 1994; Snow & Lohman, 1984, 1989). Aptitude-treatment interactions occur when different instructional treatment conditions result in differential learning outcomes depending on student aptitudes, in other words, when the effect of a given treatment is moderated by a given aptitude. Different aptitudes may influence learning in specific instructional environments, and the impact of a particular aptitude on a particular condition may only be observed for a particular type of learning outcome.

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928093592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.006

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84928093592

SN - 9780521860239

SP - 65

EP - 88

BT - Cognitive Load Theory

A2 - Plass, Jan L.

A2 - Moreno, Roxana

A2 - Brünken, Roland

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Other publications by the same author(s)

Temporal development of student burnout symptoms: Sociodemographic differences and linkage to university dropout intentions

Turhan, D., Scheunemann, A., Schnettler, T., Bäulke, L., Thies, D. O., Dresel, M., Fries, S., Leutner, D., Wirth, J. & Grunschel, C., 01.04.2023, In: Contemporary Educational Psychology. 73, 13 p., 102185.