Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapter

Authors

Support for the radical right has risen in most Western democracies. Globalization and modernization processes are usually seen as the source of this development, reshaping political conflicts and producing new groups of people that feel ‘left behind’. However, few studies test how the relatively common trends in globalization shape the variation in the timing and extent of radical right support across countries. Focusing on the economic dimension of the ‘losers of globalization’ theory, we argue that income inequality is a suitable indicator to measure the extent to which some groups have fallen behind and to capture the fear of decline in material well-being of people not (yet) at the bottom of the income distribution. The relative deterioration in material conditions, we argue further, translates into a lower subjective social status of vulnerable groups who then turn towards the radical right. By cultivating nativism and thus providing non-economic criteria of social status, the radical right becomes more attractive as societies become more unequal. We show evidence for our hypothesis by comparing vote shares for radical right parties in 20 Western democracies between 1980 and 2016. The findings indicate that rising income inequality substantially increases support for the radical right in the long run. In addition, rising inequality translates into lower subjective social status of nontertiary educated men and this process of status decline further contributes to radical right support. Hence, there are both material and non-material linkages between income inequality and radical right support.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe European Social Model under Pressure : Liber Amicorum in Honour of Klaus Armingeon
EditorsRomana Careja, Patrick Emmenegger, Nathalie Giger
Number of pages18
Place of PublicationWiesbaden
PublisherSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Publication date2020
Pages383-400
ISBN (print)978-3-658-27042-1, 3-658-27042-X
ISBN (electronic)978-3-658-27043-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Play as a creative misuse
  2. Automatic Imitation of Multiple Agents
  3. RECOVERING THE HISTORY OF A DEFEATED SOCIAL MOVEMENT
  4. Mechanical performance optimization of similar thin AA 7075‐T6 sheets produced by refill friction stir spot welding
  5. Corporate governance reforms and management control
  6. DBLP-QuAD
  7. Using bird-habitat relationships to inform urban planning
  8. Reprocessing from the inside
  9. Diversity as Polyphony
  10. Assumptions in ecosystem service assessments
  11. Mathematik 1
  12. How Participatory Should Environmental Governance Be?
  13. (Un)sichtbare Botschaften
  14. Do overlapping audit and compensation committee memberships contribute to better financial reporting quality?
  15. The Challenge of Introducing Sustainability-Oriented Innovation—An Ethnographic Study
  16. Time of Non-Reality
  17. Thinking with Diagrams
  18. Schrogl, Kai-Uwe (et. al.), Handbook of Space Security - Policies, Applications and Programs, Springer, 2015
  19. The relation of COVID-19 to the UN sustainable development goals
  20. Frustrated and helpless - sources and consequences of students’ negative deactivating emotions in university mathematics
  21. Specific SBR population behaviour as revealed by comparative dynamic simulation analysis of three full-scale municipal SBR wastewater treatment plants
  22. "Stimmiger Auftritt"
  23. We build this city on rocks and (feminist) code
  24. 2 Thessalonians as pseudepigraphic 'reading instruction' for 1 Thessalonians
  25. Combating Climate Change through Organisational Innovation
  26. Fixed income investor relations
  27. The effects of competition in local schooling markets on leadership for learning
  28. Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility decoupling—Status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research