1. //
  2. Start
  3. //
  4. Publications
  5. Imagining is Not Observing
  6. Output formats
  7. //

Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Standard

Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway. / Kulesza, Wojciech; Chrobot, Nina; Dolinski, Dariusz et al.
In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, Vol. 46, No. 3, 01.09.2022, p. 233-246.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kulesza, W, Chrobot, N, Dolinski, D, Muniak, P, Bińkowska, D, Grzyb, T & Genschow, O 2022, 'Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway', Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1

APA

Kulesza, W., Chrobot, N., Dolinski, D., Muniak, P., Bińkowska, D., Grzyb, T., & Genschow, O. (2022). Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1

Vancouver

Kulesza W, Chrobot N, Dolinski D, Muniak P, Bińkowska D, Grzyb T et al. Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2022 Sept 1;46(3):233-246. doi: 10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1

Bibtex

@article{9bc86945156148558d0ca3b15168368a,
title = "Imagining is Not Observing: The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway",
abstract = "Individuals automatically mimic a wide range of different behaviors, and such mimicking behavior has several social benefits. One of the landmark findings in the literature is that being mimicked increases liking for the mimicker. Research in cognitive neuroscience demonstrated that mentally simulating motor actions is neurophysiologically similar to engaging in these actions. Such research would predict that merely imagining being mimicked produces the same results as actually experiencing mimicry. To test this prediction, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, being mimicked increased liking for the mimicker only when mimicry was directly experienced, but not when it was merely imagined. Experiment 2 replicated this finding within a high-powered online sample: merely imagining being mimicked does not produce the same effects as being actually mimicked. Theoretical and practical implications of these experiments are discussed.",
keywords = "Chameleon effect, Imagination, Imitation, Liking, Mental simulation, Mimicry, Business psychology",
author = "Wojciech Kulesza and Nina Chrobot and Dariusz Dolinski and Pawe{\l} Muniak and Dominika Bi{\'n}kowska and Tomasz Grzyb and Oliver Genschow",
note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by: NCN (Narodowe Centrum Nauki – Polish National Science Centre), Preludium Bis 1 grant, granted to Wojciech Kulesza (Number: 2019/35/O/HS6/00420). Open access of this article was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland under the 2019–2022 program, Regional Initiative of Excellence{"}, Project Number 012/RID/2018/19. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "233--246",
journal = "Journal of Nonverbal Behavior",
issn = "0191-5886",
publisher = "Springer Science+Business Media B.V.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imagining is Not Observing

T2 - The Role of Simulation Processes Within the Mimicry-Liking Expressway

AU - Kulesza, Wojciech

AU - Chrobot, Nina

AU - Dolinski, Dariusz

AU - Muniak, Paweł

AU - Bińkowska, Dominika

AU - Grzyb, Tomasz

AU - Genschow, Oliver

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by: NCN (Narodowe Centrum Nauki – Polish National Science Centre), Preludium Bis 1 grant, granted to Wojciech Kulesza (Number: 2019/35/O/HS6/00420). Open access of this article was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland under the 2019–2022 program, Regional Initiative of Excellence", Project Number 012/RID/2018/19. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022/9/1

Y1 - 2022/9/1

N2 - Individuals automatically mimic a wide range of different behaviors, and such mimicking behavior has several social benefits. One of the landmark findings in the literature is that being mimicked increases liking for the mimicker. Research in cognitive neuroscience demonstrated that mentally simulating motor actions is neurophysiologically similar to engaging in these actions. Such research would predict that merely imagining being mimicked produces the same results as actually experiencing mimicry. To test this prediction, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, being mimicked increased liking for the mimicker only when mimicry was directly experienced, but not when it was merely imagined. Experiment 2 replicated this finding within a high-powered online sample: merely imagining being mimicked does not produce the same effects as being actually mimicked. Theoretical and practical implications of these experiments are discussed.

AB - Individuals automatically mimic a wide range of different behaviors, and such mimicking behavior has several social benefits. One of the landmark findings in the literature is that being mimicked increases liking for the mimicker. Research in cognitive neuroscience demonstrated that mentally simulating motor actions is neurophysiologically similar to engaging in these actions. Such research would predict that merely imagining being mimicked produces the same results as actually experiencing mimicry. To test this prediction, we conducted two experiments. In Experiment 1, being mimicked increased liking for the mimicker only when mimicry was directly experienced, but not when it was merely imagined. Experiment 2 replicated this finding within a high-powered online sample: merely imagining being mimicked does not produce the same effects as being actually mimicked. Theoretical and practical implications of these experiments are discussed.

KW - Chameleon effect

KW - Imagination

KW - Imitation

KW - Liking

KW - Mental simulation

KW - Mimicry

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127611507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f6c642c0-9ac1-3069-9c11-817aed2dd2f7/

U2 - 10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1

DO - 10.1007/s10919-022-00399-1

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85127611507

VL - 46

SP - 233

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

JF - Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

SN - 0191-5886

IS - 3

ER -

Related by journal

The Too-Much-Mimicry Effect: Strong (vs. Subtle) Mimicry Impairs Liking and Trust in Distributive Negotiations

Wessler, J., Loschelder, D. D., Fendel, J. C. & Friese, M., 06.2024, In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 48, 2, p. 253-276 24 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Other publications by the same author(s)

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, In: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 p., eadj5778.

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Correction: The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored Estimates from 96 Studies on Anchoring Effects (Journal of Open Psychology Data, (2022), 10, 1, (16), 10.5334/jopd.67)

Röseler, L., Weber, L., Helgerth, K., Stich, E., Günther, M., Tegethoff, P., Wagner, F. S., Ambrus, E., Antunovic, M., Barrera-Lemarchand, F., Halali, E., Ioannidis, K., Genschow, O., McKay, R., Milstein, N., Molden, D. C., Papenmeier, F., Pavlovic, Z., Rinn, R., Schreiter, M. L., Zimdahl, M. F., Allen, E., Bahník, Š., Bermeitinger, C., Blower, F. B. N., Bögler, H. L., Burgmer, P., Cheek, N. N., Dorsch, L., Fels, S. A., Frech, M. L., Freira, L., Harris, A. J. L., Hartig, B., Häusser, J. A., Hedgebeth, M. V., Henkel, M., Horvath, D., Imhoff, R., Intelmann, P., Klamar, A., Knappe, E., Köppel, L-M. A., Krueger, S. M., Lagator, S., Bóo, F. L., Navajas, J., Norem, J. K., Novak, J., Onuki, Y., Page, E., Pearton, J., Ponader, S., Rebholz, T. R., Rostekova, A., Sartorio, M., Schindler, S., Seida, C., Shanks, D. R., Siems, M. C., Speekenbrink, M., Stäglich, P., Starkulla, M., Stitz, M., Straube, T., Thies, K., Thum, E., Ueda, K., Undorf, M., Urlichich, D., Vadillo, M. A., Wolf, A. H., Zhou, A. & Schütz, A., 23.08.2024, In: Journal of Open Psychology Data. 12, 1, 3 p., 8.

Research output: Journal contributions › Comments / Debate / Reports › Research

How to Communicate Science to the Public?

Konig, L. M., Altenmüller, M. S., Fick, J., Crusius, J., Genschow, O. & Sauerland, M., 06.09.2024, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. 12 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Imitation as social influence

Genschow, O. & Oomen, D., 2024, (Accepted/In press) The research handbook on social influence. Edward Elgar Publishing

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Chapter › peer-review

Possibilities of imitation

Oomen, D. & Genschow, O., 22.05.2024, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Possibility studies & Society . 12 p.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

DOI