'I Cannot Overreach the Senate': Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Asian and African Studies, Vol. 60, No. 1, 02.2025, p. 223 - 238.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - 'I Cannot Overreach the Senate': Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate
AU - Inya, Onwu
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Both democracy and the legislature in Africa are emergent and require scholarly investigations to understand them. Therefore, this paper investigates the contextual configuration of Nigerian Senate debates (henceforth, NSD), paying particular attention to how legislators orient to the macro-context of this institutional discourse. The data comprise a 1.9 million-word corpus of NSD subjected to quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis. While the quantitative approach provides information on key semantic domains, concordance and collocational data, the qualitative analysis relies on a partial theory of the context models of parliamentary debates and the concepts of appropriateness and common ground. The components of the macro-context of NSD comprise context as social domain subcategorized into institutional setting, actors and goals, and context as social actions subcategorized into the global actions of legislation, representation and oversight function, respectively. The paper argues that legislators make explicit, through specific cognitive pragma-linguistic devices, their knowledge of aspects of the context of NSD they consider relevant for engaging in, and interpreting ongoing interaction, especially when something goes wrong.
AB - Both democracy and the legislature in Africa are emergent and require scholarly investigations to understand them. Therefore, this paper investigates the contextual configuration of Nigerian Senate debates (henceforth, NSD), paying particular attention to how legislators orient to the macro-context of this institutional discourse. The data comprise a 1.9 million-word corpus of NSD subjected to quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis. While the quantitative approach provides information on key semantic domains, concordance and collocational data, the qualitative analysis relies on a partial theory of the context models of parliamentary debates and the concepts of appropriateness and common ground. The components of the macro-context of NSD comprise context as social domain subcategorized into institutional setting, actors and goals, and context as social actions subcategorized into the global actions of legislation, representation and oversight function, respectively. The paper argues that legislators make explicit, through specific cognitive pragma-linguistic devices, their knowledge of aspects of the context of NSD they consider relevant for engaging in, and interpreting ongoing interaction, especially when something goes wrong.
KW - English
KW - Language Studies
KW - Context
KW - Nigerian Senate debates
KW - democracy
KW - knowledge
KW - legislation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153364934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00219096231168056
DO - 10.1177/00219096231168056
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 60
SP - 223
EP - 238
JO - Journal of Asian and African Studies
JF - Journal of Asian and African Studies
SN - 0021-9096
IS - 1
ER -