Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds? / Voigt, Maja-Lee; Mitrović, Mirjana.
In: Digital Geography and Society, Vol. 8, 100115, 06.2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{45b11927cf1444058f81d1cd3de03649,
title = "Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?",
abstract = "With code connecting to concrete in {\textquoteleft}smart{\textquoteright} cities, oppressive, patriarchal, and binary architectures of the urban have been translated into their algorithmic counterparts, too. This particularly excludes people who do not conform to these inscribed norms. In the public realm of streets and screens, their bodies now become misidentified as glitches by digitalized welfare services, techno-politics, and passersby. Primarily known as a visual or audible phenomenon of disruption in the technological environment, this paper advocates for conceptualizing the glitch as more than that: it understands the glitch as three-part: 1. a fleeting, but potentially violent error – either by mistake (technical) or by design (social); 2. a moment of refusal of prevailing systems; and 3. as a gateway for changing what it reveals as flawed.Drawing on (auto-)ethnographic fieldwork from 2020 to 2022 on fl{\^a}neuses* and hackfeminist collectives we will show how these grassroots urbanist actors turn the painful error of their bodies not being considered in techno-urban environments into practices of refusal and change. Creatively and collectively, they manage to turn glitches {\textquoteleft}by design{\textquoteright} into entry points to technologically and socially fight for spaces centering care instead. The portrayed bottom-up practices are important examples for breaking with social and technical binaries: Through strolling and scrolling, they dismantle tools of (digital) domination and provoke to think of who actually participates in {\textquoteleft}smartified{\textquoteright} spaces. Celebrating glitching as refusal, fl{\^a}neuses* and hackfeminists alike open up questions about the authorship and implemented ideologies hardcoded into the fabric of the cities of today. Moreover, alone and together, their refusal mobilizes alternative, plural futures and makes glitch(ing) a gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds.",
keywords = "Digital media, Glitch, Feminism, Computational cities, hacking, flaneuse, care, refusal, Cultural studies",
author = "Maja-Lee Voigt and Mirjana Mitrovi{\'c}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100115",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Digital Geography and Society",
issn = "2666-3783",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glitch(ing)! A refusal and gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds?

AU - Voigt, Maja-Lee

AU - Mitrović, Mirjana

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025/6

Y1 - 2025/6

N2 - With code connecting to concrete in ‘smart’ cities, oppressive, patriarchal, and binary architectures of the urban have been translated into their algorithmic counterparts, too. This particularly excludes people who do not conform to these inscribed norms. In the public realm of streets and screens, their bodies now become misidentified as glitches by digitalized welfare services, techno-politics, and passersby. Primarily known as a visual or audible phenomenon of disruption in the technological environment, this paper advocates for conceptualizing the glitch as more than that: it understands the glitch as three-part: 1. a fleeting, but potentially violent error – either by mistake (technical) or by design (social); 2. a moment of refusal of prevailing systems; and 3. as a gateway for changing what it reveals as flawed.Drawing on (auto-)ethnographic fieldwork from 2020 to 2022 on flâneuses* and hackfeminist collectives we will show how these grassroots urbanist actors turn the painful error of their bodies not being considered in techno-urban environments into practices of refusal and change. Creatively and collectively, they manage to turn glitches ‘by design’ into entry points to technologically and socially fight for spaces centering care instead. The portrayed bottom-up practices are important examples for breaking with social and technical binaries: Through strolling and scrolling, they dismantle tools of (digital) domination and provoke to think of who actually participates in ‘smartified’ spaces. Celebrating glitching as refusal, flâneuses* and hackfeminists alike open up questions about the authorship and implemented ideologies hardcoded into the fabric of the cities of today. Moreover, alone and together, their refusal mobilizes alternative, plural futures and makes glitch(ing) a gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds.

AB - With code connecting to concrete in ‘smart’ cities, oppressive, patriarchal, and binary architectures of the urban have been translated into their algorithmic counterparts, too. This particularly excludes people who do not conform to these inscribed norms. In the public realm of streets and screens, their bodies now become misidentified as glitches by digitalized welfare services, techno-politics, and passersby. Primarily known as a visual or audible phenomenon of disruption in the technological environment, this paper advocates for conceptualizing the glitch as more than that: it understands the glitch as three-part: 1. a fleeting, but potentially violent error – either by mistake (technical) or by design (social); 2. a moment of refusal of prevailing systems; and 3. as a gateway for changing what it reveals as flawed.Drawing on (auto-)ethnographic fieldwork from 2020 to 2022 on flâneuses* and hackfeminist collectives we will show how these grassroots urbanist actors turn the painful error of their bodies not being considered in techno-urban environments into practices of refusal and change. Creatively and collectively, they manage to turn glitches ‘by design’ into entry points to technologically and socially fight for spaces centering care instead. The portrayed bottom-up practices are important examples for breaking with social and technical binaries: Through strolling and scrolling, they dismantle tools of (digital) domination and provoke to think of who actually participates in ‘smartified’ spaces. Celebrating glitching as refusal, flâneuses* and hackfeminists alike open up questions about the authorship and implemented ideologies hardcoded into the fabric of the cities of today. Moreover, alone and together, their refusal mobilizes alternative, plural futures and makes glitch(ing) a gateway to more caring techno-urban worlds.

KW - Digital media

KW - Glitch

KW - Feminism

KW - Computational cities

KW - hacking

KW - flaneuse

KW - care

KW - refusal

KW - Cultural studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001174381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100115

DO - 10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100115

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 8

JO - Digital Geography and Society

JF - Digital Geography and Society

SN - 2666-3783

M1 - 100115

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Media Review: Extrapolations - A View from OS4F
  2. Case study on delivery time determination using a machine learning approach in small batch production companies
  3. Introduction to the special issue
  4. How to improve efficiency in budgeting
  5. Infelicitous communication or degrees of misunderstanding
  6. Short run comovement, persistent shocks and the business cycle
  7. Sliding Mode Control for a Vertical Dynamics in the Presence of Nonlinear Friction
  8. Separable models for interconnected production-inventory systems
  9. Release of monomers from four different composite materials after halogen and LED curing
  10. Power-law fluctuations in eye movements predict text comprehension during connected text reading
  11. Pathways for Transformatio
  12. Integration of Sustainability into Universities - Good Practices and Benchmarking for Integration
  13. Comparability of lcas — review and discussion of the application purpose
  14. Constructing strangeness
  15. Heinz von Foerster and Early Research in the Field of Pattern Recognition at the Biological Computer Laboratory
  16. Does the introduction of the Euro have an effect on subjective hypotheses about the price-quality relationship?
  17. Interdiffusion and atomic mobility in hcp Mg–Al–Sn alloys
  18. Organic Synthesis – Art or Science?
  19. Predictive Maintenance of Bearings Through IoT and Cloud-Based Systems
  20. Analytics and Intuition in the Process of Selecting Talent
  21. New Research on the Deep Seabed and Its Resources
  22. Eye Movements During Mathematical Word Problem Solving-Global Measures and Individual Differences
  23. Researching Interrelations of formal and informal Learning in early Adolescence form a Critical Race Perspective
  24. The Lotka-Volterra Model for Competition Controlled by a Sliding Mode Approach
  25. Anonymity reprogrammed
  26. Non-identity – So what? A political scientist’s perspective on a curious but somehow arbitrary problem
  27. Part IV: Theoretical and methodological advancements in disturbance rejection and robust control