Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance. / Lohbeck, Annette; Petermann, Franz.
In: Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.09.2019, p. 770-781.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6f9df30414f241c79ba132798296ac21,
title = "Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance",
abstract = "The present study with 2,273 students aimed to examine the factorial validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS) by using the bifactor modeling framework, that is, contrasting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model to an exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) and two bifactor models (B-CFA and B-ESEM). In addition, measurement invariance and latent mean differences in the three facets of the AFS (test anxiety, manifest anxiety, dislike of school) across gender, age groups, and school types were explored. Results provided strong support for the multidimensionality of the AFS. The B-ESEM showed the best fit to the data as opposed to the other models. Also, measurement invariance across gender, age groups, and school types was fully supported. Girls and younger students generally reported higher levels of anxiety than boys and older students, while the latter stated more dislike of school than girls and younger students. Furthermore, elementary school students showed generally higher levels of anxiety than students of the other school types.",
keywords = "anxiety, bifactor modeling, factorial validity, measurement invariance, Psychology",
author = "Annette Lohbeck and Franz Petermann",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0734282918794834",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "770--781",
journal = "Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment",
issn = "0734-2829",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS)

T2 - Bifactor Modeling and Measurement Invariance

AU - Lohbeck, Annette

AU - Petermann, Franz

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - The present study with 2,273 students aimed to examine the factorial validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS) by using the bifactor modeling framework, that is, contrasting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model to an exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) and two bifactor models (B-CFA and B-ESEM). In addition, measurement invariance and latent mean differences in the three facets of the AFS (test anxiety, manifest anxiety, dislike of school) across gender, age groups, and school types were explored. Results provided strong support for the multidimensionality of the AFS. The B-ESEM showed the best fit to the data as opposed to the other models. Also, measurement invariance across gender, age groups, and school types was fully supported. Girls and younger students generally reported higher levels of anxiety than boys and older students, while the latter stated more dislike of school than girls and younger students. Furthermore, elementary school students showed generally higher levels of anxiety than students of the other school types.

AB - The present study with 2,273 students aimed to examine the factorial validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS) by using the bifactor modeling framework, that is, contrasting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model to an exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) and two bifactor models (B-CFA and B-ESEM). In addition, measurement invariance and latent mean differences in the three facets of the AFS (test anxiety, manifest anxiety, dislike of school) across gender, age groups, and school types were explored. Results provided strong support for the multidimensionality of the AFS. The B-ESEM showed the best fit to the data as opposed to the other models. Also, measurement invariance across gender, age groups, and school types was fully supported. Girls and younger students generally reported higher levels of anxiety than boys and older students, while the latter stated more dislike of school than girls and younger students. Furthermore, elementary school students showed generally higher levels of anxiety than students of the other school types.

KW - anxiety

KW - bifactor modeling

KW - factorial validity

KW - measurement invariance

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053335275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734282918794834

DO - 10.1177/0734282918794834

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85053335275

VL - 37

SP - 770

EP - 781

JO - Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

SN - 0734-2829

IS - 6

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Thermal decomposition kinetic of salt hydrates for heat storage systems
  2. Global leadership talent selection as an integrated acquisition process
  3. Building Assistance Systems using Distributed Knowledge Representations
  4. Bifactor Models for Predicting Criteria by General and Specific Factors
  5. Sustainability-Oriented Business Model Assessment—A Conceptual Foundation
  6. Theorien-Praxen-Verknüpfungen in sozialpädagogischen Berufsbildungsgängen.
  7. Leitfaden interoperabler Assistenzsysteme - vom Szenario zur Anforderung
  8. The scope of professional preoccupation in active retirement in Germany
  9. Differentiated Instruction Around the World - A Global Inclusive Insight
  10. Book review: Critical Approaches to Women and Gender in Higher Education
  11. Alpha and beta diversity across coastal marine social-ecological systems
  12. Transferring an Analytical Technique from Ecology to the Sport Sciences
  13. Participatory scenario planning to facilitate human-wildlife coexistence
  14. Neugierig unterwegs mit dem Innovationsverbund nachhaltiger Mittelstand
  15. Praxisrelevanz – berechnet oder bedacht? Eine Replik auf Maier und Antoni
  16. Smartphones im Unterricht – Wollen das Schülerinnen und Schüler überhaupt?!
  17. Einfluss der Hochschulen auf den Zugang zum Beruf des Wirtschaftsprüfers
  18. Wie attraktiv ist der Arbeitgeber Kita für Männer im Vergleich zu Frauen?
  19. Intermediaries Driving Eco-Innovation in SMEs: A Qualitative Investigation
  20. Strategy for phytomanagement in an area affected by iron ore dam rupture
  21. Kläranlagen als Quelle für polyfluorierte Verbindungen in der Atmosphäre
  22. Taking notes as a strategy for solving reality-based tasks in mathematics
  23. Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production
  24. Wirtschaften in Netzen – Stärkung ländlicher Regionen durch Zusammenarbeit
  25. A trait-based framework linking the soil metabolome to plant–soil feedbacks
  26. Räume für das Schreiben (er)schaffen - Ein reflektierender Erfahrungsbericht
  27. Repositionierungen: Von Machtverschiebungen im Kapitalismus und Feminismus
  28. Mathematikbezogene Kompetenzmodellierung im Ingenieurwissenschaftsstudium
  29. Herausforderungen und Potentiale bei online geführten Gruppendiskussionen