Employment service: Public or private?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Employment service: Public or private? / Zweifel, Peter; Zaborowski, Christoph.
In: Public Choice, Vol. 89, No. 1-2, 01.10.1996, p. 131-162.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Zweifel P, Zaborowski C. Employment service: Public or private? Public Choice. 1996 Oct 1;89(1-2):131-162. doi: 10.1007/BF00114283

Bibtex

@article{813f50fa8f514c4784af000e6b16c190,
title = "Employment service: Public or private?",
abstract = "This paper deals with the relative performance of private and public employment services. For this purpose, two behavioral models are developed which take into account that private and and public employment agents not only pursue different aims but also face different restrictions, in particular since a public employment agency lacks the right to reject applicants. While analysis of the necessary optimality conditions yields tentative conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of both types of employment service, empirically testable hypotheses result from the predicted responses to increases in unemployment and in the cost of service, respectively. These predicted behaviors are likely to be considered unfair by society, causing dissatisfaction with both private and public employment agencies.",
keywords = "Economics",
author = "Peter Zweifel and Christoph Zaborowski",
year = "1996",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00114283",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "131--162",
journal = "Public Choice",
issn = "0048-5829",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employment service

T2 - Public or private?

AU - Zweifel, Peter

AU - Zaborowski, Christoph

PY - 1996/10/1

Y1 - 1996/10/1

N2 - This paper deals with the relative performance of private and public employment services. For this purpose, two behavioral models are developed which take into account that private and and public employment agents not only pursue different aims but also face different restrictions, in particular since a public employment agency lacks the right to reject applicants. While analysis of the necessary optimality conditions yields tentative conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of both types of employment service, empirically testable hypotheses result from the predicted responses to increases in unemployment and in the cost of service, respectively. These predicted behaviors are likely to be considered unfair by society, causing dissatisfaction with both private and public employment agencies.

AB - This paper deals with the relative performance of private and public employment services. For this purpose, two behavioral models are developed which take into account that private and and public employment agents not only pursue different aims but also face different restrictions, in particular since a public employment agency lacks the right to reject applicants. While analysis of the necessary optimality conditions yields tentative conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of both types of employment service, empirically testable hypotheses result from the predicted responses to increases in unemployment and in the cost of service, respectively. These predicted behaviors are likely to be considered unfair by society, causing dissatisfaction with both private and public employment agencies.

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21444433774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8d1bc965-a6c4-3c1e-aa60-258129c91f85/

U2 - 10.1007/BF00114283

DO - 10.1007/BF00114283

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:21444433774

VL - 89

SP - 131

EP - 162

JO - Public Choice

JF - Public Choice

SN - 0048-5829

IS - 1-2

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Pathways to Energy Transition
  2. Dynamische und zukunftsorientierte Bestandsdimensionierung
  3. Mysteriöse Kisten und Vertrautheitsreste
  4. Die Adresse des freien Bürgers
  5. Außervertragliche Haftung der EG, legislatives Unrecht
  6. Messung und Steuerung unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit
  7. Entleerung und Re-Möblierung
  8. Environmental Accounting
  9. Kommentar von: Art. 53
  10. „Spender gefunden, alles klar!“ Ethische Aspekte des HLA-Tests bei Kindern im Kontext der Stammzelltransplantation
  11. The Relationship between Family Law and Female Entrepreneurship in Germany
  12. Wettbewerbsbeschränkung, spürbare
  13. Gesundheitskompetenz von Studierenden. Befunde und Interventionsansätze
  14. Export, Import und Produktivität wissensintensiver KMUs in Deutschland
  15. Logistische Kennlinien für Lagerprozesse
  16. Arbeiterkulturen als Konfliktkulturen
  17. Die Leuphana Universität Lüneburg und die transkulturelle Wissenschaft
  18. Mathematische Kompetenz in PISA, IQB- Ländervergleich und NEPS- Drei Studien, gleiches Konstrukt?
  19. Glossar zu Grundbegriffen im Themenfeld Gesundheit - Bildung - Entwicklung
  20. Arbeitgeberattraktivität aus der Perspektive unterschiedlicher Mitarbeitergenerationen
  21. Finanzierungsstrukturen junger Unternehmen
  22. Scholtz, Christopher P.: Alltag mit künstlichen Lebewesen, Göttingen 2008
  23. Unionale Notstandsverfassung und europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht
  24. "Why, White Man, Why?" White Australia as the addressee of apostrophe in contemporary aboriginal writing
  25. It’s (not) the winning – The Special Olympics national handball teams in the trade-off between desire for sporting success and social support