Ecosystem services from (pre-)Alpine grasslands: Matches and mismatches between citizens’ perceived suitability and farmers’ management considerations
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 49, 101284, 01.06.2021.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem services from (pre-)Alpine grasslands
T2 - Matches and mismatches between citizens’ perceived suitability and farmers’ management considerations
AU - Schmitt, Thomas M.
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Kaim, Andrea
AU - Früh-Müller, Andrea
AU - Koellner, Thomas
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - The integration of socio-cultural assessments in ecosystem services research has increased steadily over the last years. However, the stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services from grasslands, a major agricultural land cover in (pre-)Alpine landscapes, has received only limited attention. Furthermore, studying the heterogeneity of perceptions within stakeholder groups is a major scientific need. In this study, we examined the perceptions of farmers and citizens regarding grassland ecosystem services, specifically the matches and mismatches between perceived suitability of grasslands and importance assigned by farmers in their management considerations. We conducted surveys in a study area in southern Bavaria, Germany, in 2018. Overall, ecosystem services that citizens perceived as very suitable to be provided by grasslands aligned well with the ecosystem services that are highly important to farmers in their management considerations, but significant mismatches also existed among all categories of ecosystem services. Clustering and dimension reduction revealed two clusters of farmers and three clusters of citizens depending on farm characteristics and environmental attitudes, respectively. Redundancy analysis showed a strong influence of the stakeholder cluster on the perception of the services assessed. Furthermore, age and gender influenced the perceptions attached to grassland ecosystem services.
AB - The integration of socio-cultural assessments in ecosystem services research has increased steadily over the last years. However, the stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services from grasslands, a major agricultural land cover in (pre-)Alpine landscapes, has received only limited attention. Furthermore, studying the heterogeneity of perceptions within stakeholder groups is a major scientific need. In this study, we examined the perceptions of farmers and citizens regarding grassland ecosystem services, specifically the matches and mismatches between perceived suitability of grasslands and importance assigned by farmers in their management considerations. We conducted surveys in a study area in southern Bavaria, Germany, in 2018. Overall, ecosystem services that citizens perceived as very suitable to be provided by grasslands aligned well with the ecosystem services that are highly important to farmers in their management considerations, but significant mismatches also existed among all categories of ecosystem services. Clustering and dimension reduction revealed two clusters of farmers and three clusters of citizens depending on farm characteristics and environmental attitudes, respectively. Redundancy analysis showed a strong influence of the stakeholder cluster on the perception of the services assessed. Furthermore, age and gender influenced the perceptions attached to grassland ecosystem services.
KW - Sustainability Science
KW - Grasslands
KW - Socio-cultural perception
KW - Mountains
KW - Cultural landscapes
KW - Grasslands
KW - Socio-cultural perception
KW - Mountains
KW - Cultural landscapes
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - Grasslands
KW - Socio-cultural perception
KW - Mountains
KW - Cultural landscapes
KW - Grasslands
KW - Socio-cultural perception
KW - Mountains
KW - Cultural landscapes
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/975389f7-a868-3518-96a8-bdd4ff1a8776/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101284
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101284
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 49
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
SN - 2212-0416
M1 - 101284
ER -