Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems - A review
Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Standard
Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems - A review. / Rosa-Schleich, Julia; Loos, Jacqueline; Mußhoff, Oliver et al.
In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 160, 01.06.2019, p. 251-263.Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems - A review
AU - Rosa-Schleich, Julia
AU - Loos, Jacqueline
AU - Mußhoff, Oliver
AU - Tscharntke, Teja
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Diversified Farming (DF) Systems aim to integrate ecological and economic benefits for sustainable agriculture. DF systems can enhance ecological benefits at the farm level and therewith reduce negative environmental externalities. However, diversification may cause economic costs for the farmer. Although considering ecological-economic trade-offs is crucial for integrating biodiversity into agricultural production, ecological and economic benefits of DF practices have rarely been analyzed conjointly. Here, we synthesize published evidence provided by reviews and meta-analyses that evaluate the ecological and economic performance of single DF practices and more complex diversification bundles. Compared to non-diversified farming, DF practices provide substantially greater biodiversity and associated ecosystem services, such as pest and weed control, soil health, nutrient and water management and carbon sequestration. Overall, the ecological benefits for the farmer were partly insufficient to outbalance economic costs in the short term, even though many examples showed that DF practices have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and reduce risks in the long-term. Combined DF practices deliver highest ecological and economic benefits on the farm level. Financial instruments are needed to increase the implementation of combined DF practices to adequately reward for the ecological benefits on the farm level.
AB - Diversified Farming (DF) Systems aim to integrate ecological and economic benefits for sustainable agriculture. DF systems can enhance ecological benefits at the farm level and therewith reduce negative environmental externalities. However, diversification may cause economic costs for the farmer. Although considering ecological-economic trade-offs is crucial for integrating biodiversity into agricultural production, ecological and economic benefits of DF practices have rarely been analyzed conjointly. Here, we synthesize published evidence provided by reviews and meta-analyses that evaluate the ecological and economic performance of single DF practices and more complex diversification bundles. Compared to non-diversified farming, DF practices provide substantially greater biodiversity and associated ecosystem services, such as pest and weed control, soil health, nutrient and water management and carbon sequestration. Overall, the ecological benefits for the farmer were partly insufficient to outbalance economic costs in the short term, even though many examples showed that DF practices have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and reduce risks in the long-term. Combined DF practices deliver highest ecological and economic benefits on the farm level. Financial instruments are needed to increase the implementation of combined DF practices to adequately reward for the ecological benefits on the farm level.
KW - Ecosystems Research
KW - Management practices
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Land-sharing
KW - Sustainable agriculture
KW - Wildlife-friendly farming
KW - Management practices
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Land-sharing
KW - Sustainable agriculture
KW - Wildlife-friendly farming
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063102338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.002
M3 - Scientific review articles
VL - 160
SP - 251
EP - 263
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
SN - 0921-8009
ER -