Do edible oils reduce bacterial colonization of enamel in situ ?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Do edible oils reduce bacterial colonization of enamel in situ ? / Hannig, Christian; Kirsch, Jasmin; Al-Ahmad, Ali et al.
In: Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 17, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 649-658.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hannig C, Kirsch J, Al-Ahmad A, Kensche A, Hannig M, Kümmerer K. Do edible oils reduce bacterial colonization of enamel in situ ? Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013 Mar;17(2):649-658. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0734-0

Bibtex

@article{35fcda70d5294643bfcb83a681bb552e,
title = "Do edible oils reduce bacterial colonization of enamel in situ ?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Edible oils are an empiric approach for the prevention of oral diseases. The present in situ study investigated the effect of edible oils on initial bacterial colonization of enamel surfaces. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Initial biofilm formation was performed on enamel specimens mounted on maxillary splints and carried by eight subjects. After 1 min of pellicle formation, rinses with safflower oil, olive oil and linseed oil were performed for 10 min. Application of chlorhexidine for 1 min served as positive control. Afterwards, the slabs were carried for 8 h overnight. Samples carried for 8 h without any rinse served as negative controls. The amount of adherent bacteria was determined by DAPI staining (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and live-dead staining (BacLight). Additionally, determination of colony forming units was performed after desorption of the bacteria. TEM evaluation was carried out after application of the rinses. RESULTS: The number of adherent bacteria on control samples was 6.1 ± 8.1 × 10(5)/cm(2) after 8 h (DAPI). Fluorescence microscopic data from DAPI staining and live-dead staining as well as from the determination of CFU revealed no significant effects of rinsing with oils on the amount of adherent bacteria compared to the non-rinsed control samples. However, with chlorhexidine a significant reduction in the number of bacteria by more than 85 % was achieved (DAPI, chlorhexidine: 8.2 ± 17.1 × 10(4)/cm(2)). The ratio of viable to dead bacteria was almost equal (1:1) irrespective of the rinse adopted as recorded with BacLight. TEM indicated accumulation of oil micelles at the pellicle's surface and modification of its ultrastructure. CONCLUSION: Rinses with edible oils have no significant impact on the initial pattern and amount of bacterial colonization on enamel over 8 h. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rinses with edible oils cannot be recommended for efficient reduction of oral biofilm formation.",
keywords = "Chemistry, BacLight, Biofilm, DAPI, Edible oil, In situ, Lipids, Pellicle, Sustainability Science",
author = "Christian Hannig and Jasmin Kirsch and Ali Al-Ahmad and Anna Kensche and Matthias Hannig and Klaus K{\"u}mmerer",
year = "2013",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s00784-012-0734-0",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "649--658",
journal = "Clinical Oral Investigations",
issn = "1436-3771",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do edible oils reduce bacterial colonization of enamel in situ ?

AU - Hannig, Christian

AU - Kirsch, Jasmin

AU - Al-Ahmad, Ali

AU - Kensche, Anna

AU - Hannig, Matthias

AU - Kümmerer, Klaus

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Edible oils are an empiric approach for the prevention of oral diseases. The present in situ study investigated the effect of edible oils on initial bacterial colonization of enamel surfaces. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Initial biofilm formation was performed on enamel specimens mounted on maxillary splints and carried by eight subjects. After 1 min of pellicle formation, rinses with safflower oil, olive oil and linseed oil were performed for 10 min. Application of chlorhexidine for 1 min served as positive control. Afterwards, the slabs were carried for 8 h overnight. Samples carried for 8 h without any rinse served as negative controls. The amount of adherent bacteria was determined by DAPI staining (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and live-dead staining (BacLight). Additionally, determination of colony forming units was performed after desorption of the bacteria. TEM evaluation was carried out after application of the rinses. RESULTS: The number of adherent bacteria on control samples was 6.1 ± 8.1 × 10(5)/cm(2) after 8 h (DAPI). Fluorescence microscopic data from DAPI staining and live-dead staining as well as from the determination of CFU revealed no significant effects of rinsing with oils on the amount of adherent bacteria compared to the non-rinsed control samples. However, with chlorhexidine a significant reduction in the number of bacteria by more than 85 % was achieved (DAPI, chlorhexidine: 8.2 ± 17.1 × 10(4)/cm(2)). The ratio of viable to dead bacteria was almost equal (1:1) irrespective of the rinse adopted as recorded with BacLight. TEM indicated accumulation of oil micelles at the pellicle's surface and modification of its ultrastructure. CONCLUSION: Rinses with edible oils have no significant impact on the initial pattern and amount of bacterial colonization on enamel over 8 h. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rinses with edible oils cannot be recommended for efficient reduction of oral biofilm formation.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Edible oils are an empiric approach for the prevention of oral diseases. The present in situ study investigated the effect of edible oils on initial bacterial colonization of enamel surfaces. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Initial biofilm formation was performed on enamel specimens mounted on maxillary splints and carried by eight subjects. After 1 min of pellicle formation, rinses with safflower oil, olive oil and linseed oil were performed for 10 min. Application of chlorhexidine for 1 min served as positive control. Afterwards, the slabs were carried for 8 h overnight. Samples carried for 8 h without any rinse served as negative controls. The amount of adherent bacteria was determined by DAPI staining (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and live-dead staining (BacLight). Additionally, determination of colony forming units was performed after desorption of the bacteria. TEM evaluation was carried out after application of the rinses. RESULTS: The number of adherent bacteria on control samples was 6.1 ± 8.1 × 10(5)/cm(2) after 8 h (DAPI). Fluorescence microscopic data from DAPI staining and live-dead staining as well as from the determination of CFU revealed no significant effects of rinsing with oils on the amount of adherent bacteria compared to the non-rinsed control samples. However, with chlorhexidine a significant reduction in the number of bacteria by more than 85 % was achieved (DAPI, chlorhexidine: 8.2 ± 17.1 × 10(4)/cm(2)). The ratio of viable to dead bacteria was almost equal (1:1) irrespective of the rinse adopted as recorded with BacLight. TEM indicated accumulation of oil micelles at the pellicle's surface and modification of its ultrastructure. CONCLUSION: Rinses with edible oils have no significant impact on the initial pattern and amount of bacterial colonization on enamel over 8 h. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rinses with edible oils cannot be recommended for efficient reduction of oral biofilm formation.

KW - Chemistry

KW - BacLight

KW - Biofilm

KW - DAPI

KW - Edible oil

KW - In situ

KW - Lipids

KW - Pellicle

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874372293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/02a11b6e-f7b2-3afe-b354-5d31693d8424/

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-012-0734-0

DO - 10.1007/s00784-012-0734-0

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 22552590

VL - 17

SP - 649

EP - 658

JO - Clinical Oral Investigations

JF - Clinical Oral Investigations

SN - 1436-3771

IS - 2

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Monitoring networking between higher education institutions and regional actors
  2. What is the threshold for a clinically relvent effect?
  3. Protecting older workers' employability
  4. Comparison of different in vitro tests for biocompatibility screening of Mg alloys
  5. Intentionalisten vs. Strukturalisten
  6. Do limiting factors at Alaskan treelines shift with climatic regimes?
  7. Assessing teachers' educational knowledge
  8. Application of Machine Learning on Transport Spot Rate Prediction In the Recycling Industry
  9. Standards und Kompetenzentwicklung in Fremd- und Zweitsprachen
  10. Knowledge Production in Consulting Teams
  11. Where is cinema (today)?
  12. Efficacy of an Internet-based problem-solving training for teachers
  13. Boundaryless working hours and recovery in Germany
  14. Anton Schnack: Werke in zwei Bänden
  15. Rechtschreiben
  16. Schreiben in der Sekundarstufe II
  17. Testing Lazear's jack-of-all-trades view of entrepreneurship with German micro data
  18. „Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?“
  19. Modell „Juniorprofessur“
  20. Rechtskonformität
  21. Is Ego Depletion Real?
  22. The online inverted classroom model (oICM). A blueprint to adapt the inverted classroom to an online learning setting in medical and health education
  23. What if this was a piece of art
  24. Diagnosebegleiter - Einzeltestkartei
  25. Sudoko mathematics for and done by younger students
  26. "When in Rome, do as the Romans do?"
  27. Teaching TetR to recognize a new inducer
  28. Strategy execution in higher education
  29. The negative interplay between national custodial sanctions and leniency
  30. Transition management as an approach to deal with climate change
  31. Evaluation and sustaining factors of machidukuri groups organized in relation with the 'hope plan'
  32. The Good have a Website