Course Evaluations: State of the Art, Proposal for a Definition and Future Trends
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Zeitschrift fur Evaluation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 04.2010, p. 49-72.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Course Evaluations
T2 - State of the Art, Proposal for a Definition and Future Trends
AU - Schmidt, Boris
AU - Lossnitzer, Tim
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Various practices of teaching feedback are currently being implemented as one important element of the uprising teaching related quality management systems in German higher education institutions. Despite their increasing use, several doubts and reservations remain on the levels of definitions, methods and practical implications. One reason for these reservations can be found in a lack of agreement on behalf of how exactly to design and implement those instruments and procedures used for teaching feedback. The present article identifies six major dimensions of design features for teaching feedback. On this theoretical base, N = 19 questionnaires used in the German speaking higher education area were being assessed by means of content analysis. Results prove that there is a surprisingly wide concordance between the different approaches. Using the combination of those features typically found, a definition of "course evaluation" is being presented as a specific and systematic way of carrying out teaching feedback. As a conclusion, future trends for course evaluations in the context of quality management for study programmes are being outlined.
AB - Various practices of teaching feedback are currently being implemented as one important element of the uprising teaching related quality management systems in German higher education institutions. Despite their increasing use, several doubts and reservations remain on the levels of definitions, methods and practical implications. One reason for these reservations can be found in a lack of agreement on behalf of how exactly to design and implement those instruments and procedures used for teaching feedback. The present article identifies six major dimensions of design features for teaching feedback. On this theoretical base, N = 19 questionnaires used in the German speaking higher education area were being assessed by means of content analysis. Results prove that there is a surprisingly wide concordance between the different approaches. Using the combination of those features typically found, a definition of "course evaluation" is being presented as a specific and systematic way of carrying out teaching feedback. As a conclusion, future trends for course evaluations in the context of quality management for study programmes are being outlined.
KW - Course Evaluation
KW - Definition
KW - Quality Management
KW - Student Feedback
KW - Higher Education and Science Management
KW - Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation
KW - Definition
KW - Qualitätsmanagement
KW - Lehrbezogenes Feedback
KW - Psychology
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000276438300004
UR - https://www.degeval.org/zeitschrift-fuer-evaluation/ausgaben/heft-12010/
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 9
SP - 49
EP - 72
JO - Zeitschrift fur Evaluation
JF - Zeitschrift fur Evaluation
SN - 1619-5515
IS - 1
ER -