Contingency in business sustainability research and in the sustainability service industry: A problematization and research agenda

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

A sustainability service industry has emerged that promotes the adoption of management tools, mechanisms, and procedures. This emergence took place despite a knowledge gap of how sustainability performance occurs in businesses. To understand practices amid the knowledge gap, this article explores through problematization how the performance orientations of practitioners and researchers relate to each other in the business sustainability field. The article unearths that like the sustainability service industry in practice, scholarship implicitly accepts assumptions of contingency in research designs. Because these implicit assumptions are unattended, it seems, to date, not possible for researchers to provide evidence-based guidance to practitioners on how to address business unsustainability. In addition, basic concepts of contingency are not yet established in this field to explain performance, rendering the acceptance of corresponding assumptions unfounded. The article concludes with research suggestions for the development of theory of sustainability performance in businesses.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganization & Environment
Volume34
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)298-322
Number of pages25
ISSN1086-0266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-9940 Imbrogiano Jean-Pierre 1 1 The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia Jean-Pierre Imbrogiano, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, 47A Staff House Road, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: j.imbrogiano@uq.edu.au 1 2020 1086026619897532 © The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications A sustainability service industry has emerged that promotes the adoption of management tools, mechanisms, and procedures. This emergence took place despite a knowledge gap of how sustainability performance occurs in businesses. To understand practices amid the knowledge gap, this article explores through problematization how the performance orientations of practitioners and researchers relate to each other in the business sustainability field. The article unearths that like the sustainability service industry in practice, scholarship implicitly accepts assumptions of contingency in research designs. Because these implicit assumptions are unattended, it seems, to date, not possible for researchers to provide evidence-based guidance to practitioners on how to address business unsustainability. In addition, basic concepts of contingency are not yet established in this field to explain performance, rendering the acceptance of corresponding assumptions unfounded. The article concludes with research suggestions for the development of theory of sustainability performance in businesses. sustainability performance sustainability service industry contingency theory problematization field assumptions edited-state corrected-proof typesetter ts1 Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was financially supported by The University of Queensland and by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). ORCID iD Jean-Pierre Imbrogiano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-9940

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

    Research areas

  • contingency theory, field assumptions, problematization, sustainability performance, sustainability service industry
  • Sustainability Governance

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Finanzwirtschaftliche Annäherungen an das Phänomen Bürgerbeteiligung
  2. Die neue Diskussion um Gemeinschaft
  3. Der Niedergang der Kreativität und die Konstanz der Kunst
  4. Qualitätsentwicklung von Schulen in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft: Evaluation der Lehrerfortbildung zur interkulturellen Koordination (2012 – 2014)
  5. Störerverantwortlichkeit bei Grundstücksgrenzen überschreitenden Grundwasserschäden
  6. Multilingualism in teacher education in Germany
  7. Gerhard O. Forde: The Captivation of the Will. Luther vs. Erasmus on Freedom and Bondage, Grand Rapids / Cambridge 2005
  8. Literaturbeziehungen
  9. Medien und klimabewusstes Verhalten
  10. Prosumer – zwischen Energiesuffizienz und Rebound-Effekten
  11. Sustainability in Karamoja?
  12. Mediale Teilhabe in Technologien relationaler Verschaltung
  13. Modifikationen der freiwilligen Einlagensicherung in Deutschland
  14. Rechnungslegung nach dem Bilanzrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz (BilMoG)
  15. Resistance to international democracy promotion in Morocco and Tunisia
  16. Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland
  17. Mensch und Wald. Theorie und Praxis einer Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung am Beispiel des Themenfelds Wald
  18. Societas Europaea
  19. Souveränität, Dynamik und Integration – making up the rules as we go along? Anmerkungen zum Lissabon-Urteil des BundesverfassungsgerichtsUrteil des BVerfG
  20. Führt Schulinspektion wirklich nicht zu besseren Schülerleistungen? Eine Einschätzung zur Belastbarkeit vorliegender Wirksamkeitsstudien aus programmtheoretischer Perspektive.
  21. „Unsere Underwriting-Philosophie ist sehr sophisticated“
  22. Going online, doing gender
  23. Schulintegrierte Produktionsstätten aus Sicht der Berufsbildungswissenschaften
  24. Trends in environmental education for biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica
  25. Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien
  26. Ein Déjà-coup-d’état-Erlebnis? Kayfabe-Politik als Netzwerkeffekt