Contingency in business sustainability research and in the sustainability service industry: A problematization and research agenda

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

A sustainability service industry has emerged that promotes the adoption of management tools, mechanisms, and procedures. This emergence took place despite a knowledge gap of how sustainability performance occurs in businesses. To understand practices amid the knowledge gap, this article explores through problematization how the performance orientations of practitioners and researchers relate to each other in the business sustainability field. The article unearths that like the sustainability service industry in practice, scholarship implicitly accepts assumptions of contingency in research designs. Because these implicit assumptions are unattended, it seems, to date, not possible for researchers to provide evidence-based guidance to practitioners on how to address business unsustainability. In addition, basic concepts of contingency are not yet established in this field to explain performance, rendering the acceptance of corresponding assumptions unfounded. The article concludes with research suggestions for the development of theory of sustainability performance in businesses.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganization & Environment
Volume34
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)298-322
Number of pages25
ISSN1086-0266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-9940 Imbrogiano Jean-Pierre 1 1 The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia Jean-Pierre Imbrogiano, Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, 47A Staff House Road, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: j.imbrogiano@uq.edu.au 1 2020 1086026619897532 © The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications A sustainability service industry has emerged that promotes the adoption of management tools, mechanisms, and procedures. This emergence took place despite a knowledge gap of how sustainability performance occurs in businesses. To understand practices amid the knowledge gap, this article explores through problematization how the performance orientations of practitioners and researchers relate to each other in the business sustainability field. The article unearths that like the sustainability service industry in practice, scholarship implicitly accepts assumptions of contingency in research designs. Because these implicit assumptions are unattended, it seems, to date, not possible for researchers to provide evidence-based guidance to practitioners on how to address business unsustainability. In addition, basic concepts of contingency are not yet established in this field to explain performance, rendering the acceptance of corresponding assumptions unfounded. The article concludes with research suggestions for the development of theory of sustainability performance in businesses. sustainability performance sustainability service industry contingency theory problematization field assumptions edited-state corrected-proof typesetter ts1 Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was financially supported by The University of Queensland and by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). ORCID iD Jean-Pierre Imbrogiano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-9940

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

    Research areas

  • contingency theory, field assumptions, problematization, sustainability performance, sustainability service industry
  • Sustainability Governance

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. State succession to investment treaties
  2. Anfechtungsmissbrauch – Gibt es einen überzeugenderen Ansatz als das ARUG?
  3. Störerverantwortlichkeit bei Grundstücksgrenzen überschreitenden Grundwasserschäden
  4. Zur kurzfristigen Vegetationsentwicklung auf Pflegeflächen in Sand- und Moorheiden
  5. T. Haigh (Hrsg.): Exploring the Early Digital
  6. Außervertragliche Haftung der EG, Schaden
  7. Zu den Arten von Kollisionsnormen in der Lehre von der Statutenkollision
  8. Ökonomistische Diskurse der Nachhaltigkeit
  9. Vorabentscheidungsverfahren, Vorlageberechtigung
  10. Persönlichkeitsbildung und Beschäftigungsfähigkeit
  11. Organisationalen Wandel fördern
  12. Planung naturbasierter Lösungen in Flusslandschaften
  13. "Crisis are looming all around". Viewpoints of young people in residential group care during the COVID-19 pandemic
  14. Cascades of green
  15. Die GoA auf der Schnittstelle von realem und hypothetischem Vertrag
  16. Die Sustainability Balanced Scorecard als Integrationsrahmen für BUIS
  17. Löwenbaby
  18. Ombuds- und Beschwerdestellen in der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
  19. Beyond the finance paradigm
  20. Verknüpfung von Self-Assessments und Verfahren zur Studierendenauswahl am Beispiel der Lehrerbildung in Lüneburg
  21. Nature-gender relations within a Social-Ecological Perspective on European Multifunctional Agriculture
  22. Kooperationsaufgaben von Stützlehrern im Spannungsfeld von Professionalisierung und strukturellen Rahmenbedingungen
  23. Does immigration boost per capita income?
  24. Ein neuer Blick auf Kitas
  25. Der Pressejournalismus als Konstrukteur männlicher Dominanz
  26. Medienkompetenz und gesellschaftliche Handlungsfähigkeit von Jugendlichen im Lichte biographischer Forschung
  27. Außervertragliche Haftung der EG, Voraussetzungen
  28. Aesthetic Expertise for Sustainable Development: Envisioning Artful Scientific Policy Advice
  29. Wege und ästhetische Dispositive
  30. VwGO §44a [Rechtsbehelfe gegen behördliche Verfahrenshandlungen]