Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups: A meta-analysis.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups : A meta-analysis. / Cuijpers, Pim; Turner, Erick H.; Mohr, D. C. et al.

In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 4, 03.2014, p. 685-695.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cuijpers P, Turner EH, Mohr DC, Hofmann SG, Andersson G, Berking M et al. Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2014 Mar;44(4):685-695. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000457

Bibtex

@article{0b3c14f01c9b49958f86275ad658a7da,
title = "Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups: A meta-analysis.",
abstract = "BackgroundThe effects of antidepressants for treating depressive disorders have been overestimated because of selective publication of positive trials. Reanalyses that include unpublished trials have yielded reduced effect sizes. This in turn has led to claims that antidepressants have clinically insignificant advantages over placebo and that psychotherapy is therefore a better alternative. To test this, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing psychotherapy with pill placebo.MethodTen 10 studies comparing psychotherapies with pill placebo were identified. In total, 1240 patients were included in these studies. For each study, Hedges{\textquoteright} g was calculated. Characteristics of the studies were extracted for subgroup and meta-regression analyses.ResultsThe effect of psychotherapy compared to pill placebo at post-test was g = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.36, I 2 = 0%, 95% CI 0–58]. This effect size corresponds to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 7.14 (95% CI 5.00–12.82). The psychotherapy conditions scored 2.66 points lower on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) than the placebo conditions, and 3.20 points lower on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Some indications for publication bias were found (two missing studies). We found no significant differences between subgroups of the studies and in meta-regression analyses we found no significant association between baseline severity and effect size.ConclusionsAlthough there are differences between the role of placebo in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research, psychotherapy has an effect size that is comparable to that of antidepressant medications. Whether these effects should be deemed clinically relevant remains open to debate.",
keywords = "Health sciences, Depression, meta-analysis, placebo, psychotherapy",
author = "Pim Cuijpers and Turner, {Erick H.} and Mohr, {D. C.} and Hofmann, {Stefan G.} and Gerhard Andersson and Matthias Berking and James Coyne",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1017/S0033291713000457",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "685--695",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups

T2 - A meta-analysis.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Turner, Erick H.

AU - Mohr, D. C.

AU - Hofmann, Stefan G.

AU - Andersson, Gerhard

AU - Berking, Matthias

AU - Coyne, James

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - BackgroundThe effects of antidepressants for treating depressive disorders have been overestimated because of selective publication of positive trials. Reanalyses that include unpublished trials have yielded reduced effect sizes. This in turn has led to claims that antidepressants have clinically insignificant advantages over placebo and that psychotherapy is therefore a better alternative. To test this, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing psychotherapy with pill placebo.MethodTen 10 studies comparing psychotherapies with pill placebo were identified. In total, 1240 patients were included in these studies. For each study, Hedges’ g was calculated. Characteristics of the studies were extracted for subgroup and meta-regression analyses.ResultsThe effect of psychotherapy compared to pill placebo at post-test was g = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.36, I 2 = 0%, 95% CI 0–58]. This effect size corresponds to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 7.14 (95% CI 5.00–12.82). The psychotherapy conditions scored 2.66 points lower on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) than the placebo conditions, and 3.20 points lower on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Some indications for publication bias were found (two missing studies). We found no significant differences between subgroups of the studies and in meta-regression analyses we found no significant association between baseline severity and effect size.ConclusionsAlthough there are differences between the role of placebo in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research, psychotherapy has an effect size that is comparable to that of antidepressant medications. Whether these effects should be deemed clinically relevant remains open to debate.

AB - BackgroundThe effects of antidepressants for treating depressive disorders have been overestimated because of selective publication of positive trials. Reanalyses that include unpublished trials have yielded reduced effect sizes. This in turn has led to claims that antidepressants have clinically insignificant advantages over placebo and that psychotherapy is therefore a better alternative. To test this, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing psychotherapy with pill placebo.MethodTen 10 studies comparing psychotherapies with pill placebo were identified. In total, 1240 patients were included in these studies. For each study, Hedges’ g was calculated. Characteristics of the studies were extracted for subgroup and meta-regression analyses.ResultsThe effect of psychotherapy compared to pill placebo at post-test was g = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.36, I 2 = 0%, 95% CI 0–58]. This effect size corresponds to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 7.14 (95% CI 5.00–12.82). The psychotherapy conditions scored 2.66 points lower on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) than the placebo conditions, and 3.20 points lower on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Some indications for publication bias were found (two missing studies). We found no significant differences between subgroups of the studies and in meta-regression analyses we found no significant association between baseline severity and effect size.ConclusionsAlthough there are differences between the role of placebo in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research, psychotherapy has an effect size that is comparable to that of antidepressant medications. Whether these effects should be deemed clinically relevant remains open to debate.

KW - Health sciences

KW - Depression

KW - meta-analysis

KW - placebo

KW - psychotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883377781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291713000457

DO - 10.1017/S0033291713000457

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 23552610

VL - 44

SP - 685

EP - 695

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 4

ER -