Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study. / Gottwald, Sarah; Albert, Christian; Fagerholm, Nora.
In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2022, p. 633-655.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{16300f044f074a1fbb6e797f89ac7fcf,
title = "Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study",
abstract = "Context: River landscapes represent hotspots for biodiversity and ecosystem services used and embraced by human agents. Changes in river landscapes are subjectively perceived by people and can be assessed through the lenses of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and sense of place (SOP). Objectives: This study aims to assess people–place relationships in a river landscape by integrating SOP theory and the CES concept and critically reflecting on their interplay. Research objectives relate to meanings and attachments attributed by citizens to places and the influence of the physical environment and socioeconomic settings. Methods: We employed a spatially meaningful place indicator in a public participation GIS survey, combining meanings elucidated through a free listing exercise and multiple-choice questions. Statistical analyses were employed to investigate relationships between meanings, place attachment, and environmental and social variables. Results: The results showed that (1) place meaning assessments can complement place attachment data by enhancing the understanding of relationships to biophysical and socioeconomic variables, and (2) combinations of both assessment approaches for place meanings showed that CESs were reflected in many free listed meaning types, dominantly related to forms or practices, but neglect relational values, such as “Heimat” (i.e., in German expression of the long-standing connection to an area) or memories. Conclusions: This paper explicates synergies between SOP theory and CES concept. CES research offers insights from spatial assessments, while SOP research provides theoretical depth regarding relational values linked to CES. This paper critically reflects the ostensible consent of understanding SOP as a CES and proposes considering SOP as an overarching theory for CES assessment.",
keywords = "Cultural ecosystem services, PPGIS, Participatory mapping, Place attachment, Place meanings, Relational values, River landscape, Environmental planning",
author = "Sarah Gottwald and Christian Albert and Nora Fagerholm",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10980-021-01362-z",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "633--655",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "SPB Academic Publishing",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study

AU - Gottwald, Sarah

AU - Albert, Christian

AU - Fagerholm, Nora

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2022/2/1

Y1 - 2022/2/1

N2 - Context: River landscapes represent hotspots for biodiversity and ecosystem services used and embraced by human agents. Changes in river landscapes are subjectively perceived by people and can be assessed through the lenses of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and sense of place (SOP). Objectives: This study aims to assess people–place relationships in a river landscape by integrating SOP theory and the CES concept and critically reflecting on their interplay. Research objectives relate to meanings and attachments attributed by citizens to places and the influence of the physical environment and socioeconomic settings. Methods: We employed a spatially meaningful place indicator in a public participation GIS survey, combining meanings elucidated through a free listing exercise and multiple-choice questions. Statistical analyses were employed to investigate relationships between meanings, place attachment, and environmental and social variables. Results: The results showed that (1) place meaning assessments can complement place attachment data by enhancing the understanding of relationships to biophysical and socioeconomic variables, and (2) combinations of both assessment approaches for place meanings showed that CESs were reflected in many free listed meaning types, dominantly related to forms or practices, but neglect relational values, such as “Heimat” (i.e., in German expression of the long-standing connection to an area) or memories. Conclusions: This paper explicates synergies between SOP theory and CES concept. CES research offers insights from spatial assessments, while SOP research provides theoretical depth regarding relational values linked to CES. This paper critically reflects the ostensible consent of understanding SOP as a CES and proposes considering SOP as an overarching theory for CES assessment.

AB - Context: River landscapes represent hotspots for biodiversity and ecosystem services used and embraced by human agents. Changes in river landscapes are subjectively perceived by people and can be assessed through the lenses of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and sense of place (SOP). Objectives: This study aims to assess people–place relationships in a river landscape by integrating SOP theory and the CES concept and critically reflecting on their interplay. Research objectives relate to meanings and attachments attributed by citizens to places and the influence of the physical environment and socioeconomic settings. Methods: We employed a spatially meaningful place indicator in a public participation GIS survey, combining meanings elucidated through a free listing exercise and multiple-choice questions. Statistical analyses were employed to investigate relationships between meanings, place attachment, and environmental and social variables. Results: The results showed that (1) place meaning assessments can complement place attachment data by enhancing the understanding of relationships to biophysical and socioeconomic variables, and (2) combinations of both assessment approaches for place meanings showed that CESs were reflected in many free listed meaning types, dominantly related to forms or practices, but neglect relational values, such as “Heimat” (i.e., in German expression of the long-standing connection to an area) or memories. Conclusions: This paper explicates synergies between SOP theory and CES concept. CES research offers insights from spatial assessments, while SOP research provides theoretical depth regarding relational values linked to CES. This paper critically reflects the ostensible consent of understanding SOP as a CES and proposes considering SOP as an overarching theory for CES assessment.

KW - Cultural ecosystem services

KW - PPGIS

KW - Participatory mapping

KW - Place attachment

KW - Place meanings

KW - Relational values

KW - River landscape

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118230131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-021-01362-z

DO - 10.1007/s10980-021-01362-z

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 37

SP - 633

EP - 655

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 2

ER -