Children's interpretation of ambiguous pronouns based on prior discourse
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Developmental Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, e13049, 01.05.2021.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Children's interpretation of ambiguous pronouns based on prior discourse
AU - Bohn, Manuel
AU - Le, Khuyen Nha
AU - Peloquin, Benjamin
AU - Köymen, Bahar
AU - Frank, Michael C.
N1 - Funding Information: We thank Megan Merrick and Sabina Zacco for their help with the data collection and all families for participating. Manuel Bohn received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska‐Curie grant agreement no. 749229. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - In conversation, individual utterances are almost always ambiguous, with this ambiguity resolved by context and discourse history (common ground). One important cue for disambiguation is the topic under discussion with a particular partner (e.g., “want to pick?” means something different in a conversation with a bluegrass musician vs. with a book club partner). Here, we investigated 2- to 5-year-old American English-speaking children's (N = 131) reliance on conversational topics with specific partners to interpret ambiguous or novel words. In a tablet-based game, children heard a speaker consistently refer to objects from a category without mentioning the category itself. In Study 1, 3- and 4-year-olds interpreted the ambiguous pronoun “it” as referring to another member of the same category. In Study 2, only 4-year-olds interpreted the pronoun as referring to the implied category when talking to the same speaker but not when talking to a new speaker. Thus, children's conception of what constitutes common ground in discourse develops substantially between ages 2 and 5.
AB - In conversation, individual utterances are almost always ambiguous, with this ambiguity resolved by context and discourse history (common ground). One important cue for disambiguation is the topic under discussion with a particular partner (e.g., “want to pick?” means something different in a conversation with a bluegrass musician vs. with a book club partner). Here, we investigated 2- to 5-year-old American English-speaking children's (N = 131) reliance on conversational topics with specific partners to interpret ambiguous or novel words. In a tablet-based game, children heard a speaker consistently refer to objects from a category without mentioning the category itself. In Study 1, 3- and 4-year-olds interpreted the ambiguous pronoun “it” as referring to another member of the same category. In Study 2, only 4-year-olds interpreted the pronoun as referring to the implied category when talking to the same speaker but not when talking to a new speaker. Thus, children's conception of what constitutes common ground in discourse develops substantially between ages 2 and 5.
KW - conceptual development
KW - discourse
KW - language development
KW - pragmatics
KW - social cognition
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094214891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/desc.13049
DO - 10.1111/desc.13049
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33064923
AN - SCOPUS:85094214891
VL - 24
JO - Developmental Science
JF - Developmental Science
SN - 1363-755X
IS - 3
M1 - e13049
ER -