Spanish-speaking caregivers’ use of referential labels with toddlers is a better predictor of later vocabulary than their use of referential gestures

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Janet Y. Bang
  • Manuel Bohn
  • Joel Ramírez
  • Virginia A. Marchman
  • Anne Fernald

Variation in how frequently caregivers engage with their children is associated with variation in children's later language outcomes. One explanation for this link is that caregivers use both verbal behaviors, such as labels, and non-verbal behaviors, such as gestures, to help children establish reference to objects or events in the world. However, few studies have directly explored whether language outcomes are more strongly associated with referential behaviors that are expressed verbally, such as labels, or non-verbally, such as gestures, or whether both are equally predictive. Here, we observed caregivers from 42 Spanish-speaking families in the US engage with their 18-month-old children during 5-min lab-based, play sessions. Children's language processing speed and vocabulary size were assessed when children were 25 months. Bayesian model comparisons assessed the extent to which the frequencies of caregivers’ referential labels, referential gestures, or labels and gestures together, were more strongly associated with children's language outcomes than a model with caregiver total words, or overall talkativeness. The best-fitting models showed that children who heard more referential labels at 18 months were faster in language processing and had larger vocabularies at 25 months. Models including gestures, or labels and gestures together, showed weaker fits to the data. Caregivers’ total words predicted children's language processing speed, but predicted vocabulary size less well. These results suggest that the frequency with which caregivers of 18-month-old children use referential labels, more so than referential gestures, is a critical feature of caregiver verbal engagement that contributes to language processing development and vocabulary growth. Research Highlights: We examined the frequency of referential communicative behaviors, via labels and/or gestures, produced by caregivers during a 5-min play interaction with their 18-month-old children. We assessed predictive relations between labels, gestures, their combination, as well as total words spoken, and children's processing speed and vocabulary growth at 25 months. Bayesian model comparisons showed that caregivers’ referential labels at 18 months best predicted both 25-month vocabulary measures, although total words also predicted later processing speed. Frequent use of referential labels by caregivers, more so than referential gestures, is a critical feature of communicative behavior that supports children's later vocabulary learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13354
JournalDevelopmental Science
Volume26
Issue number4
Number of pages14
ISSN1363-755X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Research areas

  • communicative reference, gestures, labels, language processing, vocabulary size, word learning
  • Psychology

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Time Use and Time Budgets
  2. Present knowledge and need for further research
  3. Understanding the diffusion of domestic biogas technologies.
  4. Article 15 Scope of the Law Applicable
  5. "Learning by doing"
  6. Intermediate `time-spaces' - The rediscovery of transition in spatial planning and environmental planning
  7. Rebound-Effekte
  8. Live Sports, Piracy and Uncertainty: Understanding Illegal Streaming Aggregation Platforms
  9. Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation
  10. External rotation of the auditor
  11. Sensor Measures of Affective Leaning
  12. Prologue: Analyzing the Fine Details of Political Commitment
  13. Systemanalyse für Softwaresysteme
  14. Timing and fragmentation of daily working hours arrangements and income inequality
  15. Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
  16. Appreciating ecological complexity
  17. Maschinenbelegungsplanung mit evolutionären Algorithmen
  18. What goes around, comes around? Access and allocation problems in Global North-South waste trade
  19. Schrogl, Kai-Uwe (et. al.), Handbook of Space Security - Policies, Applications and Programs, Springer, 2015
  20. Economic Evaluation of an Internet-Based Stress Management Intervention Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial
  21. Governance approaches to address scale issues in biodiversity management – current situation and ways forward
  22. Variable annuities and the option to seek risk
  23. Making professors
  24. Impact of audit committees with independent financial experts on accounting quality
  25. Integration of expertise or collaborative practice?
  26. Bifurcation loads of circular curved beams of glued-laminated timber with continuous lateral support
  27. Hot deformation behavior and processing map of Mg-3Sn-2Ca-0.4Al-0.4Zn alloy
  28. Fieldwork meets crisis: Introduction
  29. Response to David B. Brooks
  30. Social network activities as a predictor for phase transitions of patients with bipolar affective disorders
  31. "alterNature" in Drew Hayden Taylor’s The Berlin Blues. Construction and De(con)struction of Contested Spaces
  32. Determinants and Consequences of Executive Compensation-Related Shareholder Activism and Say-on-Pay Votes
  33. Reinforcing Systems of Exclusion
  34. Estimation of physicochemical properties of 52 non-PBDE brominated flame retardants and evaluation of their overall persistence and long-range transport potential
  35. Paulsen, Friedrich