Changes in butterfly movements along a gradient of land use in farmlands of Transylvania (Romania)

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Changes in butterfly movements along a gradient of land use in farmlands of Transylvania (Romania). / Loos, Jacqueline; Kuussaari, Mikko; Ekroos, Johan et al.
In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 625-635.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Loos J, Kuussaari M, Ekroos J, Hanspach J, Fust P, Jackson L et al. Changes in butterfly movements along a gradient of land use in farmlands of Transylvania (Romania). Landscape Ecology. 2015 Apr;30(4):625-635. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0141-9

Bibtex

@article{99fadd606db2495a92cf3b61af648985,
title = "Changes in butterfly movements along a gradient of land use in farmlands of Transylvania (Romania)",
abstract = "Context: Agricultural transformation and increased land use intensity often lead to simplified landscapes and biodiversity loss. For animals, one possible mechanism underpinning biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes is the disruption of movements. The disruption of movements may explain, for example, why butterfly communities in agricultural landscapes are often dominated by generalist species with high mobility.Objectives: Here, we investigated how the movement patterns of butterflies characterised by different levels of mobility changed along a gradient of agricultural land use intensity.Methods: To this end, we studied 15 landscapes in low-intensity farmland in Central Romania, measuring 10 ha each and covering a gradient of landscape heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover. In these landscapes, we tracked movements of 563 individuals of nine butterfly species.Results: Our findings showed that overall movement activities differed significantly between species, corresponding well with expert-derived estimates of species-specific mobility. Interestingly, species of low and high mobility responded in opposite ways to increasing levels of landscape heterogeneity. In relatively simple landscapes, the movement patterns of low and high mobility species were similar. By contrast, in complex landscapes, the flight paths of low-mobility species became shorter and more erratic, whereas the flight paths of high-mobility species became longer and straighter. An analysis of the land covers traversed showed that most species avoided arable land but favoured the more heterogeneous parts of a given landscape.Conclusions: In combination, our results suggest that non-arable patches in agricultural landscapes are important for butterfly movements, especially for low-mobility species.",
keywords = "Dispersal, Eastern Europe, Ecological flows, Farmland biodiversity, Individual tracking, Intensification, Land use change, Landscape functional grain, Landscape heterogeneity, Mobility, Sustainability Science",
author = "Jacqueline Loos and Mikko Kuussaari and Johan Ekroos and Jan Hanspach and Pascal Fust and Laurie Jackson and Joern Fischer",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s10980-014-0141-9",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "625--635",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "SPB Academic Publishing",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in butterfly movements along a gradient of land use in farmlands of Transylvania (Romania)

AU - Loos, Jacqueline

AU - Kuussaari, Mikko

AU - Ekroos, Johan

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Fust, Pascal

AU - Jackson, Laurie

AU - Fischer, Joern

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Context: Agricultural transformation and increased land use intensity often lead to simplified landscapes and biodiversity loss. For animals, one possible mechanism underpinning biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes is the disruption of movements. The disruption of movements may explain, for example, why butterfly communities in agricultural landscapes are often dominated by generalist species with high mobility.Objectives: Here, we investigated how the movement patterns of butterflies characterised by different levels of mobility changed along a gradient of agricultural land use intensity.Methods: To this end, we studied 15 landscapes in low-intensity farmland in Central Romania, measuring 10 ha each and covering a gradient of landscape heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover. In these landscapes, we tracked movements of 563 individuals of nine butterfly species.Results: Our findings showed that overall movement activities differed significantly between species, corresponding well with expert-derived estimates of species-specific mobility. Interestingly, species of low and high mobility responded in opposite ways to increasing levels of landscape heterogeneity. In relatively simple landscapes, the movement patterns of low and high mobility species were similar. By contrast, in complex landscapes, the flight paths of low-mobility species became shorter and more erratic, whereas the flight paths of high-mobility species became longer and straighter. An analysis of the land covers traversed showed that most species avoided arable land but favoured the more heterogeneous parts of a given landscape.Conclusions: In combination, our results suggest that non-arable patches in agricultural landscapes are important for butterfly movements, especially for low-mobility species.

AB - Context: Agricultural transformation and increased land use intensity often lead to simplified landscapes and biodiversity loss. For animals, one possible mechanism underpinning biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes is the disruption of movements. The disruption of movements may explain, for example, why butterfly communities in agricultural landscapes are often dominated by generalist species with high mobility.Objectives: Here, we investigated how the movement patterns of butterflies characterised by different levels of mobility changed along a gradient of agricultural land use intensity.Methods: To this end, we studied 15 landscapes in low-intensity farmland in Central Romania, measuring 10 ha each and covering a gradient of landscape heterogeneity and woody vegetation cover. In these landscapes, we tracked movements of 563 individuals of nine butterfly species.Results: Our findings showed that overall movement activities differed significantly between species, corresponding well with expert-derived estimates of species-specific mobility. Interestingly, species of low and high mobility responded in opposite ways to increasing levels of landscape heterogeneity. In relatively simple landscapes, the movement patterns of low and high mobility species were similar. By contrast, in complex landscapes, the flight paths of low-mobility species became shorter and more erratic, whereas the flight paths of high-mobility species became longer and straighter. An analysis of the land covers traversed showed that most species avoided arable land but favoured the more heterogeneous parts of a given landscape.Conclusions: In combination, our results suggest that non-arable patches in agricultural landscapes are important for butterfly movements, especially for low-mobility species.

KW - Dispersal

KW - Eastern Europe

KW - Ecological flows

KW - Farmland biodiversity

KW - Individual tracking

KW - Intensification

KW - Land use change

KW - Landscape functional grain

KW - Landscape heterogeneity

KW - Mobility

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925496051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-014-0141-9

DO - 10.1007/s10980-014-0141-9

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84925496051

VL - 30

SP - 625

EP - 635

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 4

ER -