Assessing Drifting Fish Aggregating Device (dFAD) Abandonment under International Marine Pollution Law

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Assessing Drifting Fish Aggregating Device (dFAD) Abandonment under International Marine Pollution Law. / Schatz, Valentin.
In: Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.07.2024, p. 243-263.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a3c11d145fae48e8a08cbaa3f30d2de8,
title = "Assessing Drifting Fish Aggregating Device (dFAD) Abandonment under International Marine Pollution Law",
abstract = "This article asks whether the abandonment of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) is illegal under international marine pollution law. To answer this question, it provides a brief overview of the general international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment as well as specific legal regimes, namely the London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (LC), its 1996 Protocol (LP), and Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). The article concludes that the abandonment of dFADs contravenes the LC/LP and/or, depending on the preferred interpretation, MARPOL Annex V. The decision as to which of the two regimes is applicable depends on whether dFAD abandonment can be classified as 'incidental to, or derived from the normal operations of vessels .. and their equipment' or not. The negligent loss of dFADs always violates MARPOL Annex V. The article also shows that certain state practice and opinio juris suggests a parallel applicability of the two regimes with respect to deliberate dFAD abandonment. While such a development would ensure more comprehensive coverage of the relevant standards and prohibitions, a clear regulatory decision as to which of the two regimes is the correct one would be preferable from an implementation and enforcement perspective.",
keywords = "Abandoned, and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG), Drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs), International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), International Maritime Organization (IMO), London Dumping Convention, London Dumping Protocol, lost, Marine pollution, Politics",
author = "Valentin Schatz",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S2047102524000098",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "243--263",
journal = "Transnational Environmental Law",
issn = "2047-1025",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Drifting Fish Aggregating Device (dFAD) Abandonment under International Marine Pollution Law

AU - Schatz, Valentin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2024/7/1

Y1 - 2024/7/1

N2 - This article asks whether the abandonment of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) is illegal under international marine pollution law. To answer this question, it provides a brief overview of the general international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment as well as specific legal regimes, namely the London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (LC), its 1996 Protocol (LP), and Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). The article concludes that the abandonment of dFADs contravenes the LC/LP and/or, depending on the preferred interpretation, MARPOL Annex V. The decision as to which of the two regimes is applicable depends on whether dFAD abandonment can be classified as 'incidental to, or derived from the normal operations of vessels .. and their equipment' or not. The negligent loss of dFADs always violates MARPOL Annex V. The article also shows that certain state practice and opinio juris suggests a parallel applicability of the two regimes with respect to deliberate dFAD abandonment. While such a development would ensure more comprehensive coverage of the relevant standards and prohibitions, a clear regulatory decision as to which of the two regimes is the correct one would be preferable from an implementation and enforcement perspective.

AB - This article asks whether the abandonment of drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) is illegal under international marine pollution law. To answer this question, it provides a brief overview of the general international legal framework for the protection of the marine environment as well as specific legal regimes, namely the London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (LC), its 1996 Protocol (LP), and Annex V of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). The article concludes that the abandonment of dFADs contravenes the LC/LP and/or, depending on the preferred interpretation, MARPOL Annex V. The decision as to which of the two regimes is applicable depends on whether dFAD abandonment can be classified as 'incidental to, or derived from the normal operations of vessels .. and their equipment' or not. The negligent loss of dFADs always violates MARPOL Annex V. The article also shows that certain state practice and opinio juris suggests a parallel applicability of the two regimes with respect to deliberate dFAD abandonment. While such a development would ensure more comprehensive coverage of the relevant standards and prohibitions, a clear regulatory decision as to which of the two regimes is the correct one would be preferable from an implementation and enforcement perspective.

KW - Abandoned

KW - and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG)

KW - Drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs)

KW - International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)

KW - International Maritime Organization (IMO)

KW - London Dumping Convention

KW - London Dumping Protocol

KW - lost

KW - Marine pollution

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192087875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0fe2499e-2f99-3c67-9ccf-0f60ba1943b4/

U2 - 10.1017/S2047102524000098

DO - 10.1017/S2047102524000098

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85192087875

VL - 13

SP - 243

EP - 263

JO - Transnational Environmental Law

JF - Transnational Environmental Law

SN - 2047-1025

IS - 2

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. High with low
  2. Einleitung
  3. Autonomie der Migration
  4. Moral Sensitivity
  5. Multidimensional approaches in ecosystem services assessment
  6. Product diversification and stability of employment and sales
  7. Dynamische Modellierung der Sorption von Substanzen in einem hydrologischen Einzugsgebietsmodell anhand des Beispiels Phosphor
  8. Anspruch und Klage
  9. The role of uncertainty and trust in the marketing of new technologies
  10. Video
  11. "Performing Life"
  12. Brief
  13. Corrosion behaviour of magnesium alloys with RE additions in sodium chloride solutions
  14. Relict populations in ancient woodlands
  15. Wissen im Zeitalter der Simulation
  16. Valuing beaches for beauty and recreation only? Uncovering perception bias through a hashtag analysis
  17. Growth-trait relationships in subtropical forest are stronger at higher diversity
  18. Comparative Regionalism beyond Europe versus the Rest
  19. Verkleben
  20. Semi-infinite Optimierung
  21. Green infrastructure connectivity analysis across spatiotemporal scales
  22. Financing Consumer (Co-)Ownership of Renewable Energy Sources
  23. Crossmodal Associations Between Olfaction and Vision
  24. Mimikbasierte Emotionserfassung anhand von dynamischen Flächen und Streckenveränderung
  25. Ressourcen- oder mitgliederbasiert?
  26. Governing Climate Change by Diffusion
  27. On the Western Narrative of Empowerment Through ICT
  28. Investigation On The Influence Of Remanufacturing On Production Planning And Control – A Systematic Literature Review
  29. Warum Selbstevaluation?
  30. Risk and Security
  31. Pfad einer integrativen Gerechtigkeit
  32. To the unknown reader: Constructing absent readership in the eighteenth-century novel: Fielding, Sterne and Richardson
  33. Martin Warnke. A question of method
  34. Managerial Eco-Control in Manufacturing and Process Industries
  35. Rechenwege-Quartett