Artificial Creativity: Emergent Works and the Void in Current Copyright Doctrine

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Artificial intelligence (AI) is on everyone’s lips and is in everyday use. Yet discussion of what this means for our present and futureparticularly in terms of the revolutions that AI might bring to the legal sphere—has only just begun. One topic that warrants, but has yet to receive, in-depth attention is the relevance of AI for innovative and creative activity and production. Legal analyses thus far have focused on humans and their role as innovators, authors, or creators. Left in the dark, however, is the question of how to regulate AI when it “innovates” or “creates” autonomously—without human direction or intervention.

Examples of such artificial creativity abound. Robots and computers have recently come to paint works of art, compose symphonies, and write news articles, poetry, and novels. All of these “works” would doubtlessly be protected by copyright if created by a human being. But we are hopelessly naïve when confronted with whether and how copyright law and neighboring areas of intellectual property protection should respond to the rise of AI. Indeed, current law is devoid of rules and doctrines for artificial creativity—with the result that AI-generated works are left unprotected. The consequences of such neglect are yet to be discussed.

This Article provides an overview of the status quo of artificial creativity—i.e., creative production by AI—and its regulation (or, rather, non-regulation) in different jurisdictions, as well as an analysis of relevant doctrinal debates and economic foundations. It then offers suggestions for a reconceptualization of current doctrine, outlining a roadmap and overarching framework for legislative action and practical adjudication.
Original languageEnglish
JournalYale Journal of Law and Technology
Volume22
Pages (from-to)1-60
Number of pages60
ISSN2766-2403
Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Research areas

  • Law

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Kevin Drews

Publications

  1. Entrepreneurship: the missing link for democratization and development in fragile nations?
  2. Expanding the pie or spoiling the cake? How the number of negotiation issues affects integrative bargaining
  3. Adjusting the Sails
  4. Environmental rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements in Colombian households
  5. Odor Classification
  6. Investigation of minimum creep rates and stress exponents calculated from tensile and compressive creep data of magnesium alloy AE42
  7. Baudrillard revisited
  8. Organisationen hacken
  9. Verhindern und Normieren.
  10. Liveness Formats
  11. Quo Vadis, Umweltinformatik? 6. Workshop
  12. Molecular analysis meets morphology-based systematics-a synthetic approach for Chalarinae (Insecta: Diptera: Pipunculidae)
  13. Anonymized Firm Data under Test: Evidence from a Replication Study
  14. Representative time use data and new harmonised calibration of the American Heritage Time Use Data (AHTUD) 1965-1999
  15. Flood risk management via collaborative modelling
  16. An extended kalman filter for temperature monitoring of a metal-polymer hybrid fibre based heater structure
  17. Socioeconomic status and word problem solving in PISA: The role of mathematical content areas
  18. Integrierte Eingabegeräte
  19. Magnesium recycling: State-of-the-Art developments, part II
  20. Why the future is democratic
  21. Treatment or Documentation? Pareto Optimality in the Physicians’ Time Allocation
  22. Rapid ecosystem change challenges the adaptive capacity of local environmental knowledge
  23. Comparing eye movements during mathematical word problem solving in Chinese and German
  24. Elementary School Students’ Length Estimation Skills
  25. Model-based estimation of pesticides and transformation products and their export pathways in a headwater catchment
  26. Guest Editorial
  27. Calibrated Passive Sampling - Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers
  28. Representative time use data and calibration of the American time use studies 1965 - 1999