Are private banks the better banks? An insight into the principal-agent structure and risk-taking behavior of German banks
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, 08.07.2015, p. 518-540.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Are private banks the better banks?
T2 - An insight into the principal-agent structure and risk-taking behavior of German banks
AU - Schmielewski, Frank
AU - Wein, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2013, © European Union.
PY - 2015/7/8
Y1 - 2015/7/8
N2 - In this study, we hypothesize that the distinguishable principal-agent relationships of German banks significantly influence the risk-taking attitudes of bank managers. In particular, we substantiate the theory that banks owned by dispersed shareholders, or federal state authorities, face a higher relevance of principal-agent problems than other banking sectors due to the lack of monitoring bank managers. Our results show that lack of accountability allows bank managers the liberty to participate in risk-taking behavior. First we present, from the bank owners' viewpoint, a theoretical model to explain three factors of principal-agent relationships used to determine the highest probability of choosing an optimal portfolio of risky assets. The three factors are: the ability to control bank managers, the risk pooling capabilities of bank owners and bank managers, and the incentive of seeking high returns. To support our hypothesis, we apply an empirical study to the distance-to-default of different German banking sectors. This demonstrates that the risk-taking attitudes of banks are closely related to banks' ownership structures. Consequent to our findings, we suggest legislative and regulatory authorities increase vigilance in terms of principal-agent problems within certain sectors of the banking industry.
AB - In this study, we hypothesize that the distinguishable principal-agent relationships of German banks significantly influence the risk-taking attitudes of bank managers. In particular, we substantiate the theory that banks owned by dispersed shareholders, or federal state authorities, face a higher relevance of principal-agent problems than other banking sectors due to the lack of monitoring bank managers. Our results show that lack of accountability allows bank managers the liberty to participate in risk-taking behavior. First we present, from the bank owners' viewpoint, a theoretical model to explain three factors of principal-agent relationships used to determine the highest probability of choosing an optimal portfolio of risky assets. The three factors are: the ability to control bank managers, the risk pooling capabilities of bank owners and bank managers, and the incentive of seeking high returns. To support our hypothesis, we apply an empirical study to the distance-to-default of different German banking sectors. This demonstrates that the risk-taking attitudes of banks are closely related to banks' ownership structures. Consequent to our findings, we suggest legislative and regulatory authorities increase vigilance in terms of principal-agent problems within certain sectors of the banking industry.
KW - Management studies
KW - financial crises
KW - risk-taking behavior
KW - risk aversion
KW - efficient portfolios
KW - information asymmetries market efficiency
KW - Gorverment policy and regulation
KW - risk pooling
KW - seeking for high returns
KW - monitoring capacibilities
KW - capital and ownership structure
KW - distance-to-default
KW - capital asset ratio
KW - return on assets
KW - Politics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930482728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12197-013-9266-y
DO - 10.1007/s12197-013-9266-y
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 39
SP - 518
EP - 540
JO - Journal of Economics and Finance
JF - Journal of Economics and Finance
SN - 1055-0925
IS - 3
ER -