Anti-identity strategizing: The dynamic interplay of “who we are” and “who we are not”
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Strategic Organization, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.02.2020, p. 136-170.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Anti-identity strategizing
T2 - The dynamic interplay of “who we are” and “who we are not”
AU - Stanske, Sarah
AU - Rauch, Madeleine
AU - Canato, Anna
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - In this article, we investigate the strategy–identity nexus by illustrating the interaction between organizational identity, anti-identity, and strategy. While extant research illustrates the potentially constraining role of organizational identity on change trajectories, less is known about the role of organizational anti-identity. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a leading German distributor’s 32-year history, we highlight the importance of organizational anti-identity for both continuous and discontinuous change initiatives, and illustrate how organizational members can overcome identity ambiguity by referring to “who we are not as an organization” rather than to “who we are as an organization.” We further show how managers who draw on identity reservoirs may have greater leeway when exploiting anti-identity, and how ambiguity and resistance may be overcome by referring to “who we are not” as an organization. Our findings broaden our understanding of the role of anti-identity for strategy selection and contribute to the burgeoning literature on the strategy–identity nexus.
AB - In this article, we investigate the strategy–identity nexus by illustrating the interaction between organizational identity, anti-identity, and strategy. While extant research illustrates the potentially constraining role of organizational identity on change trajectories, less is known about the role of organizational anti-identity. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a leading German distributor’s 32-year history, we highlight the importance of organizational anti-identity for both continuous and discontinuous change initiatives, and illustrate how organizational members can overcome identity ambiguity by referring to “who we are not as an organization” rather than to “who we are as an organization.” We further show how managers who draw on identity reservoirs may have greater leeway when exploiting anti-identity, and how ambiguity and resistance may be overcome by referring to “who we are not” as an organization. Our findings broaden our understanding of the role of anti-identity for strategy selection and contribute to the burgeoning literature on the strategy–identity nexus.
KW - Management studies
KW - anti-identity
KW - identity reservoir
KW - organizational identity
KW - strategizing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068206027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/70e0a1fd-aff3-3222-b423-14492b11a0db/
U2 - 10.1177/1476127019855753
DO - 10.1177/1476127019855753
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 18
SP - 136
EP - 170
JO - Strategic Organization
JF - Strategic Organization
SN - 1476-1270
IS - 1
ER -