A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing. / McKinley, William; Zhao, Jun; Rust, Kathleen Garrett.

In: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 227-243.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McKinley W, Zhao J, Rust KG. A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing. Academy of Management Review. 2000 Jan 1;25(1):227-243. doi: 10.2307/259272

Bibtex

@article{4327e912a8544c868c027617791aecbe,
title = "A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing",
abstract = "To better understand the phenomenon of organizational downsizing, we compare three theoretical perspectives on downsizing: the economic, the institutional, and the sociocognitive. We use the three perspectives to organize the growing empirical literature on downsizing, and we link streams of empirical work to the theoretical perspective that underlies each. With our sociocognitive model, we argue that down sizing has become institutionalized through the collectivization and reification of a {"}downsizing is effective{"} schema. We also discuss implications for future theory and research. ",
keywords = "Management studies",
author = "William McKinley and Jun Zhao and Rust, {Kathleen Garrett}",
year = "2000",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/259272",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "227--243",
journal = "Academy of Management Review",
issn = "0363-7425",
publisher = "Academy of Management (Briarcliff Manor, NY) ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Sociocognitive Interpretation of Organizational Downsizing

AU - McKinley, William

AU - Zhao, Jun

AU - Rust, Kathleen Garrett

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - To better understand the phenomenon of organizational downsizing, we compare three theoretical perspectives on downsizing: the economic, the institutional, and the sociocognitive. We use the three perspectives to organize the growing empirical literature on downsizing, and we link streams of empirical work to the theoretical perspective that underlies each. With our sociocognitive model, we argue that down sizing has become institutionalized through the collectivization and reification of a "downsizing is effective" schema. We also discuss implications for future theory and research.

AB - To better understand the phenomenon of organizational downsizing, we compare three theoretical perspectives on downsizing: the economic, the institutional, and the sociocognitive. We use the three perspectives to organize the growing empirical literature on downsizing, and we link streams of empirical work to the theoretical perspective that underlies each. With our sociocognitive model, we argue that down sizing has become institutionalized through the collectivization and reification of a "downsizing is effective" schema. We also discuss implications for future theory and research.

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034341808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/848dc9d5-a0c7-3748-8117-f09bc35cc225/

U2 - 10.2307/259272

DO - 10.2307/259272

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 25

SP - 227

EP - 243

JO - Academy of Management Review

JF - Academy of Management Review

SN - 0363-7425

IS - 1

ER -

Links

DOI