A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management. / Ferreira, Ana F.; Zimmermann, Heike; Santos, Rui et al.
In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 10, 3608, 10.10.2018.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3d4bfa143f914a37b570962c2dd05c45,
title = "A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management",
abstract = "Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system{\textquoteright}s scales dynamics.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, biodiversity, biosphere reserve, conservation, governance, management effectiveness, protected area, social-ecological system, sustainable develeopment, systematic review",
author = "Ferreira, {Ana F.} and Heike Zimmermann and Rui Santos and Henrik Wehrden",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 by the authors.",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "10",
doi = "10.3390/su10103608",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management

AU - Ferreira, Ana F.

AU - Zimmermann, Heike

AU - Santos, Rui

AU - Wehrden, Henrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 by the authors.

PY - 2018/10/10

Y1 - 2018/10/10

N2 - Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system’s scales dynamics.

AB - Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system’s scales dynamics.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - biodiversity

KW - biosphere reserve

KW - conservation

KW - governance

KW - management effectiveness

KW - protected area

KW - social-ecological system

KW - sustainable develeopment

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054744667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1fcbaa75-ccc1-3411-abf0-651100a75250/

U2 - 10.3390/su10103608

DO - 10.3390/su10103608

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 10

M1 - 3608

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Socio-Environmental Vulnerability of Agriculture Communities to Climate Change in Western Himalaya: A Household-Level Review
  2. Bedingungen zur Ermöglichung von Bildung und Teilhabe junger Geflüchteter im Kontext digitalisierter Bildungsarrangements
  3. Potential duration of unemployment benefits and labor market outcomes for older workers with health impairments in Germany
  4. Die Krise feministischer Positionen in Zeiten der Pandemie: Zwischen Sorgen für das ‚gute Leben’ und Herrschen gegen die ‚Natur’
  5. A leverage points perspective on institutions for food security in a smallholder-dominated landscape in southwestern Ethiopia
  6. Lehrerkooperation, Unterrichtsqualität und fachliche und überfachliche Ergebnisse von Schüler*innen in Englisch und Mathematik
  7. Flowers in the dark: The contribution of rooftop urban agriculture to human well-being in the Ein El-Hilweh Refugee Camp, Lebanon
  8. The programme on ecosystem change and society (PECS) – a decade of deepening social-ecological research through a place-based focus
  9. Relational Transdisciplinarity: Five Reflexive Steps for Embodying Relational Ontologies in Transdisciplinary Learning Contexts
  10. Going beyond efficiency: including altruistic motives in behavioral models for sustainability transitions to address sufficiency.
  11. Comparison of terminally ill cancer-vs. non-cancer patients in specialized palliative home care in Germany-A single service analysis
  12. Barley shoot biomass responds strongly to N:P stoichiometry and intraspecific competition, whereas roots only alter their foraging
  13. Die Entwicklung des Emotionswissens und der behavioralen Selbstregulation bei Vorschulkindern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund
  14. Effects of daily static stretch training over 6 weeks on maximal strength, muscle thickness, contraction properties, and flexibility
  15. Assessing the added value of the recent declaration on unregulated fishing for sustainable governance of the central Arctic Ocean
  16. Axel Roch: Claude E. Shannon: Spielzeug, Leben und die geheime Geschichte seiner Theorie der Information. gegenstalt. Berlin 2009, 254 S.
  17. Vom stadträumlichen Pionier zur Kulturstätte inmitten der Pandemie. Musikclubs als (sozial-)räumliche Akteure urbaner Musikökosysteme
  18. Auswahl des Prüfers für Nachhaltigkeitsberichte nach der geplanten Umsetzung der Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
  19. SOME EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF THE EXPENDITURES CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF PERSONS IN THE GERMAN STATUTORY HEALTH-INSURANCE SYSTEM
  20. Occurrence, distribution, and ecotoxicological risk assessment of selected pharmaceutical compounds in water from Lake Victoria, Uganda