A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Standard

A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management. / Ferreira, Ana F.; Zimmermann, Heike; Santos, Rui et al.
In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 10, 3608, 10.10.2018.

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3d4bfa143f914a37b570962c2dd05c45,
title = "A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management",
abstract = "Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system{\textquoteright}s scales dynamics.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, biodiversity, biosphere reserve, conservation, governance, management effectiveness, protected area, social-ecological system, sustainable develeopment, systematic review",
author = "Ferreira, {Ana F.} and Heike Zimmermann and Rui Santos and Henrik Wehrden",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 by the authors.",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "10",
doi = "10.3390/su10103608",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management

AU - Ferreira, Ana F.

AU - Zimmermann, Heike

AU - Santos, Rui

AU - Wehrden, Henrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 by the authors.

PY - 2018/10/10

Y1 - 2018/10/10

N2 - Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system’s scales dynamics.

AB - Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system’s scales dynamics.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - biodiversity

KW - biosphere reserve

KW - conservation

KW - governance

KW - management effectiveness

KW - protected area

KW - social-ecological system

KW - sustainable develeopment

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054744667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1fcbaa75-ccc1-3411-abf0-651100a75250/

U2 - 10.3390/su10103608

DO - 10.3390/su10103608

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 10

M1 - 3608

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Challenges in Education A Deweyan Assessment of AI Technologies in the Classroom
  2. Online cognitive-based intervention for depression
  3. Growth-trait relationships in subtropical forest are stronger at higher diversity
  4. Joint proceedings of RSP 2017 and QuWeDa 2017
  5. How does nature contribute to human mobility? A conceptual framework and qualitative analysis
  6. The online inverted classroom model (oICM). A blueprint to adapt the inverted classroom to an online learning setting in medical and health education
  7. Entwicklung und realisierung eines computer-basierten lernprogramms zur GMP-schulung/Programm-entwicklung und benutzer-akzeptanz
  8. Transferring biodiversity-ecosystem function research to the management of ‘real-world’ ecosystems
  9. Mechanisms of dialectical change
  10. Diagnosebegleiter - Einzeltestkartei
  11. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Forming Zone in Dieless Wire Drawing Process of Thin Biometallic Wires
  12. Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations
  13. Loopdiver
  14. Integrating Art and Education for Sustainable Development. A Transdisciplinary Working Process in the Context of Culture and Sustainability
  15. Precipitation Kinetics of AA6082: An Experimental and Numerical Investigation
  16. Teaching TetR to recognize a new inducer
  17. Predictive mapping of species richness and plant species' distributions of a peruvian fog oasis along an altitudinal gradient
  18. Dynamicland
  19. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences
  20. Motivation revisited
  21. „Das ewig Dauernde in uns“. Immanenz und Transzendenz in Stifters Nachsommer
  22. Organizational Practices for the Aging Workforce
  23. Physicochemical properties and biodegradability of organically functionalized colloidal silica particles in aqueous environment
  24. Der Zeitpfeil im Digitalen
  25. Author Correction: Widening global variability in grassland biomass since the 1980s
  26. Innovativeness and initiative as mediators between achievement orientation and venture performance
  27. Public value performance
  28. The GLOBTEC Tech Adoption Tracker
  29. The negative interplay between national custodial sanctions and leniency
  30. Developing and Evaluating Entrepreneurship Curricula
  31. Teaching entrepreneurship as lived experience through ‘wonderment exercises’
  32. Evaluation and sustaining factors of machidukuri groups organized in relation with the 'hope plan'