A guide to training your own horses: The flaneur appproach and Erving Goffman's uninhibited research practices in sociology

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A guide to training your own horses: The flaneur appproach and Erving Goffman's uninhibited research practices in sociology. / Dellwing, Michael.
In: Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 126-142.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{252d31cb9c0a41b7b2f5418961040134,
title = "A guide to training your own horses: The flaneur appproach and Erving Goffman's uninhibited research practices in sociology",
abstract = "While Erving Goffman's sociology has enjoyed great popularity and is cited often, the career of his work has been largely confined to other scholars reaping, adapting, and utilizing his concepts. Goffman was opposed to science that just reproduces and orders concepts, and opposed to his students using his concepts as easy tools. Instead, he recommended they train their own horses: While there is much to use in Goffman's work, there is little scholarship that continues the genius of his practical approach. As valuable as Goffman's categories are, his collection practice and his analytical scheme may be even more valuable. On the one hand, they offer an intricate framework for research that is as open as it is directed; on the other hand, they allow researchers to argue freedom from the ever more imposing bad imitations of natural scientific method that threaten to overgrow the social sciences. Together, they allow Goffmanesque work without merely parroting his concepts. This article attempts to outline Goffman's eclectic way of collecting material and his technique for fashioning this material into analyses, reordering this material around different metaphors that make Goffman's contribution distinct. I call Goffman's practical research a flaneur approach, and outline it. The paper then makes an argument for its continuation.",
keywords = "dramaturgy, Erving Goffman, ethnography, everyday life, metaphor, Sociology",
author = "Michael Dellwing",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/symb.216",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "126--142",
journal = "Symbolic Interaction",
issn = "0195-6086",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A guide to training your own horses

T2 - The flaneur appproach and Erving Goffman's uninhibited research practices in sociology

AU - Dellwing, Michael

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - While Erving Goffman's sociology has enjoyed great popularity and is cited often, the career of his work has been largely confined to other scholars reaping, adapting, and utilizing his concepts. Goffman was opposed to science that just reproduces and orders concepts, and opposed to his students using his concepts as easy tools. Instead, he recommended they train their own horses: While there is much to use in Goffman's work, there is little scholarship that continues the genius of his practical approach. As valuable as Goffman's categories are, his collection practice and his analytical scheme may be even more valuable. On the one hand, they offer an intricate framework for research that is as open as it is directed; on the other hand, they allow researchers to argue freedom from the ever more imposing bad imitations of natural scientific method that threaten to overgrow the social sciences. Together, they allow Goffmanesque work without merely parroting his concepts. This article attempts to outline Goffman's eclectic way of collecting material and his technique for fashioning this material into analyses, reordering this material around different metaphors that make Goffman's contribution distinct. I call Goffman's practical research a flaneur approach, and outline it. The paper then makes an argument for its continuation.

AB - While Erving Goffman's sociology has enjoyed great popularity and is cited often, the career of his work has been largely confined to other scholars reaping, adapting, and utilizing his concepts. Goffman was opposed to science that just reproduces and orders concepts, and opposed to his students using his concepts as easy tools. Instead, he recommended they train their own horses: While there is much to use in Goffman's work, there is little scholarship that continues the genius of his practical approach. As valuable as Goffman's categories are, his collection practice and his analytical scheme may be even more valuable. On the one hand, they offer an intricate framework for research that is as open as it is directed; on the other hand, they allow researchers to argue freedom from the ever more imposing bad imitations of natural scientific method that threaten to overgrow the social sciences. Together, they allow Goffmanesque work without merely parroting his concepts. This article attempts to outline Goffman's eclectic way of collecting material and his technique for fashioning this material into analyses, reordering this material around different metaphors that make Goffman's contribution distinct. I call Goffman's practical research a flaneur approach, and outline it. The paper then makes an argument for its continuation.

KW - dramaturgy

KW - Erving Goffman

KW - ethnography

KW - everyday life

KW - metaphor

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957687373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/symb.216

DO - 10.1002/symb.216

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84957687373

VL - 39

SP - 126

EP - 142

JO - Symbolic Interaction

JF - Symbolic Interaction

SN - 0195-6086

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Frank Schmielewski

Publications

  1. Sprachgebräuche jenseits des Sprechens
  2. Grundbegriffe des Strafrechts
  3. Handbuch Grounded Theory
  4. Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs
  5. Sauberkeit ist messbar
  6. Heterogene Argumentationen zur Legitimierung der Didaktik des Sachunterrichts
  7. RiB-Kit (RFID-in-a-Box)
  8. Bildungsgang Realschule
  9. Die Wissenschaftsinitiative „Management und unternehmerisches Handeln"
  10. Die Hälfte des Himmels, nicht die Hälfte des Mülls
  11. The ground beetle supertribe zuphiitae in the southern levant
  12. Transdiagnostic tailored internet- and mobile-based guided treatment for major depressive disorder and comorbid anxiety
  13. § 37 Außenwirtschaftsstrafrecht
  14. Spontaneität und Begegnung
  15. A unique nest-protection strategy in a new species of spider wasp
  16. Die Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie
  17. Trade union membership in eastern and western Germany
  18. Transdisziplinäre Entwicklungsteams
  19. The regulation of zero-price markets by the competition authorities in the USA and the EU
  20. Perspectives on German Popular Music
  21. Sustainable business models and sustainable supply chain management
  22. Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk
  23. Besessenheit und Ansteckung
  24. Exposure of the Irish population to PBDEs in food
  25. Lieferzeitbestimmung in der auftragsbezogenen Werkstattfertigung mittels maschinellen Lernens
  26. Social Contexts in Team Formation:
  27. Auf die Temperatur kommt es an!
  28. Medienerziehung in Kindertagesstätten
  29. Sprachstand
  30. Kommentierung von Art. 26 AEUV: Binnenmarkt
  31. Logistische Modelle für die Analyse innerbetrieblicher Lieferketten
  32. Plant communities of the summits of the Dund Saykhan mountain range (Southern Mongolia)