A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship. / Chase, Jonathan M.; Gooriah, Leana ; May, Felix et al.

In: Frontiers of Biogeography , Vol. 11, No. 1, e40844, 30.04.2019.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Chase, J. M., Gooriah, L., May, F., Ryberg, W. A., Schuler , M. S., Craven, D., & Knight, T. M. (2019). A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship. Frontiers of Biogeography , 11(1), [e40844]. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG40844

Vancouver

Chase JM, Gooriah L, May F, Ryberg WA, Schuler MS, Craven D et al. A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship. Frontiers of Biogeography . 2019 Apr 30;11(1):e40844. doi: 10.21425/F5FBG40844

Bibtex

@article{b19c09aad1924825b9b4501159d72d1f,
title = "A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship",
abstract = "The relationship between an island's size and the number of species on that island-the island species-area relationship (ISAR)-is one of the most well-known patterns in biogeography and forms the basis for understanding biodiversity loss in response to habitat loss and fragmentation. Nevertheless, there is contention about exactly how to estimate the ISAR and the influence of the three primary ecological mechanisms that drive it - random sampling, disproportionate effects, and heterogeneity. Key to this contention is that estimates of the ISAR are often confounded by sampling and estimates of measures (i.e., island-level species richness) that are not diagnostic of potential mechanisms. Here, we advocate a sampling-explicit approach for disentangling the possible ecological mechanisms underlying the ISAR using parameters derived from individual-based rarefaction curves estimated across spatial scales. If the parameters derived from rarefaction curves at each spatial scale show no relationship with island area, we cannot reject the hypothesis that ISARs result only from random sampling. However, if the derived metrics change with island area, we can reject random sampling as the only operating mechanism and infer that effects beyond sampling (i.e., disproportionate effects and/or heterogeneity) are also operating. Finally, if parameters indicative of within-island spatial variation in species composition (i.e., β-diversity) increase with island area, we can conclude that intra-island compositional heterogeneity plays a role in driving the ISAR. We illustrate this approach using representative case studies, including oceanic islands, natural island-like patches, and habitat fragments from formerly continuous habitat, illustrating several combinations of underlying mechanisms. This approach will offer insight into the role of sampling and other processes that underpin the ISAR, providing a more complete understanding of how, and some indication of why, patterns of biodiversity respond to gradients in island area.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Biology, Alpha-diversity, Area per se, Beta-diversity, Biodiversity, Fragmentation, Gamma-Diversity, Heterogeneity, Individual-Based Rarefaction, Island, Sampling Effects, Scale, Species-Area Relationship",
author = "Chase, {Jonathan M.} and Leana Gooriah and Felix May and Ryberg, {Wade A.} and Schuler, {Matthew S.} and Dylan Craven and Knight, {Tiffany M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} the authors.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.21425/F5FBG40844",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers of Biogeography",
issn = "1948-6596",
publisher = "eScholarship University of California",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A framework for disentangling ecological mechanisms underlying the island species–area relationship

AU - Chase, Jonathan M.

AU - Gooriah, Leana

AU - May, Felix

AU - Ryberg, Wade A.

AU - Schuler , Matthew S.

AU - Craven, Dylan

AU - Knight, Tiffany M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © the authors.

PY - 2019/4/30

Y1 - 2019/4/30

N2 - The relationship between an island's size and the number of species on that island-the island species-area relationship (ISAR)-is one of the most well-known patterns in biogeography and forms the basis for understanding biodiversity loss in response to habitat loss and fragmentation. Nevertheless, there is contention about exactly how to estimate the ISAR and the influence of the three primary ecological mechanisms that drive it - random sampling, disproportionate effects, and heterogeneity. Key to this contention is that estimates of the ISAR are often confounded by sampling and estimates of measures (i.e., island-level species richness) that are not diagnostic of potential mechanisms. Here, we advocate a sampling-explicit approach for disentangling the possible ecological mechanisms underlying the ISAR using parameters derived from individual-based rarefaction curves estimated across spatial scales. If the parameters derived from rarefaction curves at each spatial scale show no relationship with island area, we cannot reject the hypothesis that ISARs result only from random sampling. However, if the derived metrics change with island area, we can reject random sampling as the only operating mechanism and infer that effects beyond sampling (i.e., disproportionate effects and/or heterogeneity) are also operating. Finally, if parameters indicative of within-island spatial variation in species composition (i.e., β-diversity) increase with island area, we can conclude that intra-island compositional heterogeneity plays a role in driving the ISAR. We illustrate this approach using representative case studies, including oceanic islands, natural island-like patches, and habitat fragments from formerly continuous habitat, illustrating several combinations of underlying mechanisms. This approach will offer insight into the role of sampling and other processes that underpin the ISAR, providing a more complete understanding of how, and some indication of why, patterns of biodiversity respond to gradients in island area.

AB - The relationship between an island's size and the number of species on that island-the island species-area relationship (ISAR)-is one of the most well-known patterns in biogeography and forms the basis for understanding biodiversity loss in response to habitat loss and fragmentation. Nevertheless, there is contention about exactly how to estimate the ISAR and the influence of the three primary ecological mechanisms that drive it - random sampling, disproportionate effects, and heterogeneity. Key to this contention is that estimates of the ISAR are often confounded by sampling and estimates of measures (i.e., island-level species richness) that are not diagnostic of potential mechanisms. Here, we advocate a sampling-explicit approach for disentangling the possible ecological mechanisms underlying the ISAR using parameters derived from individual-based rarefaction curves estimated across spatial scales. If the parameters derived from rarefaction curves at each spatial scale show no relationship with island area, we cannot reject the hypothesis that ISARs result only from random sampling. However, if the derived metrics change with island area, we can reject random sampling as the only operating mechanism and infer that effects beyond sampling (i.e., disproportionate effects and/or heterogeneity) are also operating. Finally, if parameters indicative of within-island spatial variation in species composition (i.e., β-diversity) increase with island area, we can conclude that intra-island compositional heterogeneity plays a role in driving the ISAR. We illustrate this approach using representative case studies, including oceanic islands, natural island-like patches, and habitat fragments from formerly continuous habitat, illustrating several combinations of underlying mechanisms. This approach will offer insight into the role of sampling and other processes that underpin the ISAR, providing a more complete understanding of how, and some indication of why, patterns of biodiversity respond to gradients in island area.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Biology

KW - Alpha-diversity

KW - Area per se

KW - Beta-diversity

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Fragmentation

KW - Gamma-Diversity

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Individual-Based Rarefaction

KW - Island

KW - Sampling Effects

KW - Scale

KW - Species-Area Relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065766385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21425/F5FBG40844

DO - 10.21425/F5FBG40844

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers of Biogeography

JF - Frontiers of Biogeography

SN - 1948-6596

IS - 1

M1 - e40844

ER -

Documents

DOI