A colonial lack of imagination: Climate futures between catastrophism and cruel eco-optimism

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Public debates about climate futures increasingly oscillate between the extremes of catastrophism and cruel eco-optimism. While different social imaginaries of climate change are part of sociological debates, to date this specific dynamic has not been extensively explored. By examining recent examples of climate change coverage and analyzing new ideological trends such as “apocalyptic optimism, ” I situate this imaginative impasse in the sociological debate about social imaginaries of climate change. While catastrophism itself is nothing new, the specific feedback loop between catastrophism and cruel eco-optimism distinguishes today’s social imaginary from that of the 1950s and 1970s. Drawing on recent decolonial and indigenous concepts such as “settler apocalypticism” and “carbon imaginary” that offer a critique of the fixation on future catastrophes, my argument is that the oscillation between despair and denial has a colonial undertone and can thus be interpreted as a colonial lack of imagination. Overall, my aim is twofold: First, I want to direct attention towards the colonial dimension of the imaginative impasse. The impression that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism is itself an effect of colonial ways of envisioning time and history. Second, I want to propose an interdisciplinary angle to think about the problem space of climate futures and corresponding political feelings by bringing into conversation sociological assessments of the present, studies on climate feelings, decolonial and indigenous studies, eco-socialist interventions and some authors of early critical theory. Against this background, I reference the work of Günther Anders (2003) and ask what a training of the imagination would signify in today’s context.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Political Ecology
Volume31
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)759-769
Number of pages9
ISSN1073-0451
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© (2024), (University of Arizona Libraries). All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • affects, Anthropocene, catastrophism, climate change, colonialism, futures, Social imaginary
  • Cultural studies

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. The Integration of Wheelchair Users in Team Handball
  2. Carbon footprinting of large product portfolios. Extending the use of Enterprise Resource Planning systems to carbon information management
  3. Repeat Receipts
  4. Quantitative determination on hot tearing in Mg-Al binary alloys
  5. Introduction
  6. Vom Wildwuchs zur Norm
  7. Multiple streams, resistance and energy policy change in Paraguay (2004–2014)
  8. Networks of Clusters
  9. Linking stakeholder survey, scenario analysis, and simulation modeling to explore the long-term impacts of regional water governance regimes
  10. 'Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem'
  11. Verbraucherrechtsdurchsetzung
  12. The knowledge transfer potential of online data pools on nature-based solutions
  13. Democratization
  14. Plastics in our ocean as transdisciplinary challenge
  15. Characterization of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria as sources of compounds with antioxidant capacity
  16. Materialitäten der Kindheit
  17. Non-sterile fermentation of food waste with indigenous consortium and yeast – Effects on microbial community and product spectrum
  18. Neorealism
  19. Portraying myth more convincingly
  20. Sustainable Development as a Challenge for Undergraduate Students: The Module "Science Bears Responsibility" in the Leuphana Bachelor's Programme
  21. Is there a compensating wage differential for high crime levels?
  22. The European Commission’s Expert Groups
  23. The effectiveness of interventions during and after residence in women’s shelters
  24. Innovative approaches in mathematical modeling
  25. Students' Time Allocation and School Performance
  26. Grundsatzfragen und Paradoxien für die Netzwerkarbeit in BBS futur 2.0