A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. / Crossman, Neville D.; Burkhard, Benjamin; Nedkov, Stoyan et al.
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 4, 06.2013, p. 4-14.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Crossman, ND, Burkhard, B, Nedkov, S, Willemen, L, Petz, K, Palomo, I, Drakou, EG, Martín-Lopez, B, McPhearson, T, Boyanova, K, Alkemade, R, Egoh, B, Dunbar, MB & Maes, J 2013, 'A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services', Ecosystem Services, vol. 4, pp. 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

APA

Crossman, N. D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E. G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M. B., & Maes, J. (2013). A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 4, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

Vancouver

Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I et al. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services. 2013 Jun;4:4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

Bibtex

@article{73a7ae63a4294af19ac48d117a64f9db,
title = "A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services",
abstract = "The inconsistency in methods to quantify and map ecosystem services challenges the development of robust values of ecosystem services in national accounts and broader policy and natural resource management decision-making. In this paper we develop and test a blueprint to give guidance on modelling and mapping ecosystem services. The primary purpose of this blueprint is to provide a template and checklist of information needed for those beginning an ecosystem service modelling and mapping study. A secondary purpose is to provide, over time, a database of completed blueprints that becomes a valuable information resource of methods and information used in previous modelling and mapping studies. We base our blueprint on a literature review, expert opinions (as part of a related workshop organised during the 5th ESP conference. 2) and critical assessment of existing techniques used to model and map ecosystem services. While any study that models and maps ecosystem services will have its unique characteristics and will be largely driven by data and model availability, a tool such as the blueprint presented here will reduce the uncertainty associated with quantifying ecosystem services and thereby help to close the gap between theory and practice.",
keywords = "Ecosystem assessment, Environmental accounting, Geographic information systems, Indicators, Spatial analysis, Standards, Sustainability Science",
author = "Crossman, {Neville D.} and Benjamin Burkhard and Stoyan Nedkov and Louise Willemen and Katalin Petz and Ignacio Palomo and Drakou, {Evangelia G.} and Berta Mart{\'i}n-Lopez and Timon McPhearson and Kremena Boyanova and Rob Alkemade and Benis Egoh and Dunbar, {Martha B.} and Joachim Maes",
year = "2013",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "4--14",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services

AU - Crossman, Neville D.

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - Nedkov, Stoyan

AU - Willemen, Louise

AU - Petz, Katalin

AU - Palomo, Ignacio

AU - Drakou, Evangelia G.

AU - Martín-Lopez, Berta

AU - McPhearson, Timon

AU - Boyanova, Kremena

AU - Alkemade, Rob

AU - Egoh, Benis

AU - Dunbar, Martha B.

AU - Maes, Joachim

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - The inconsistency in methods to quantify and map ecosystem services challenges the development of robust values of ecosystem services in national accounts and broader policy and natural resource management decision-making. In this paper we develop and test a blueprint to give guidance on modelling and mapping ecosystem services. The primary purpose of this blueprint is to provide a template and checklist of information needed for those beginning an ecosystem service modelling and mapping study. A secondary purpose is to provide, over time, a database of completed blueprints that becomes a valuable information resource of methods and information used in previous modelling and mapping studies. We base our blueprint on a literature review, expert opinions (as part of a related workshop organised during the 5th ESP conference. 2) and critical assessment of existing techniques used to model and map ecosystem services. While any study that models and maps ecosystem services will have its unique characteristics and will be largely driven by data and model availability, a tool such as the blueprint presented here will reduce the uncertainty associated with quantifying ecosystem services and thereby help to close the gap between theory and practice.

AB - The inconsistency in methods to quantify and map ecosystem services challenges the development of robust values of ecosystem services in national accounts and broader policy and natural resource management decision-making. In this paper we develop and test a blueprint to give guidance on modelling and mapping ecosystem services. The primary purpose of this blueprint is to provide a template and checklist of information needed for those beginning an ecosystem service modelling and mapping study. A secondary purpose is to provide, over time, a database of completed blueprints that becomes a valuable information resource of methods and information used in previous modelling and mapping studies. We base our blueprint on a literature review, expert opinions (as part of a related workshop organised during the 5th ESP conference. 2) and critical assessment of existing techniques used to model and map ecosystem services. While any study that models and maps ecosystem services will have its unique characteristics and will be largely driven by data and model availability, a tool such as the blueprint presented here will reduce the uncertainty associated with quantifying ecosystem services and thereby help to close the gap between theory and practice.

KW - Ecosystem assessment

KW - Environmental accounting

KW - Geographic information systems

KW - Indicators

KW - Spatial analysis

KW - Standards

KW - Sustainability Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879452917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84879452917

VL - 4

SP - 4

EP - 14

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Perceptron and SVM learning with generalized cost models
  2. Tree and mycorrhizal fungal diversity drive intraspecific and intraindividual trait variation in temperate forests
  3. Assessing empirical research on value-based management
  4. An Equation with many Variables
  5. Chip extrusion with integrated equal channel angular pressing
  6. Ontology-based automatic classification for Web pages
  7. A highly transparent method of assessing the contribution of incentives to meet various technical challenges in distributed energy systems
  8. Properties of some overlapping self-similar and some self-affine measures
  9. Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Management Accounting
  10. Import and export of ideas
  11. Phase Shift APOD and POD Control Technique in Multi-Level Inverters to Mitigate Total Harmonic Distortion
  12. Using frequency tagging to investigate social processing in autism
  13. Does symbolic representation through class signalling appeal to voters? Evidence from a conjoint experiment
  14. Microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of large-scale sand-cast Mg-3Y-2Gd-1Nd-0.4Zr alloy
  15. Adaptive wavelet methods for saddle point problems
  16. Set oriented computation of transport rates in 3-degree of freedom systems
  17. Overcoming physical distancing in online communities to create human spaces for societal transformations
  18. Geometric control tools for robotic manipulators
  19. Digital and IT-Enabled Organizational Transformation - Where Do We Go From Here?
  20. Towards a Better Understanding of the Phenomenon of "Adolescent Struggling Readers"
  21. Prothesen, Aufschreibesysteme, Cyborgs
  22. Is the market classification of risk always efficient?
  23. Augmented space
  24. From Enterprise Architecture to Business Ecosystem Architecture
  25. Application of Friction Riveting technique for the assembly of electronic components on printed circuit boards (PCB)
  26. “Making Sense”
  27. Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through Orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project