Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation

Michael Frese; Kathrin Rosing

Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Abstracts in Konferenzbänden › Forschung › begutachtet

Standard

Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation. / Frese, Michael ; Rosing, Kathrin.

Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013: Imagine the future world: How do we want to work tomorrow?. Hrsg. / Guido Hertel; Carmen Binnewies; Stefan Krumm; Heinz Holling; Martin Kleinmann. Münster : Münstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte, 2013. S. 660-661.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Abstracts in Konferenzbänden › Forschung › begutachtet

Harvard

Frese, M & Rosing, K 2013, Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation. in G Hertel, C Binnewies, S Krumm, H Holling & M Kleinmann (Hrsg.), Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013: Imagine the future world: How do we want to work tomorrow?. Münstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte, Münster, S. 660-661, 16th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology - EAWOP 2013, Münster, Deutschland, 22.05.13. <http://www.labsi.org/innocenti/abstractvolume-EAWOP-2013%20(1).pdf>

APA

Frese, M., & Rosing, K. (2013). Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation. in G. Hertel, C. Binnewies, S. Krumm, H. Holling, & M. Kleinmann (Hrsg.), Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013: Imagine the future world: How do we want to work tomorrow? (S. 660-661). Münstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte. http://www.labsi.org/innocenti/abstractvolume-EAWOP-2013%20(1).pdf

Vancouver

Frese M , Rosing K. Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation. in Hertel G, Binnewies C, Krumm S, Holling H, Kleinmann M, Hrsg., Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013: Imagine the future world: How do we want to work tomorrow?. Münster: Münstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte. 2013. S. 660-661

Bibtex

@inbook{c0669a1feb1a4e009cefe0bc995bc229,

title = "Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation",

abstract = "Innovation, the development of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation.Research produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges. This literature leads to one overwhelming summary: Innovation is paradoxical. As a step toward developing an integrative theory, we applied in 2009 a dialectic perspective to innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoningand to gain a more valid account (Bledow et al., 2009). We would like to give an idea of where we are with this kind of theory. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflictingdemands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. Central to our theorizing at this moment are affective shift models and ambidextrous leadership for innovation.",

keywords = "Psychology, Innovation",

author = "Michael Frese and Kathrin Rosing",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

pages = "660--661",

editor = "Guido Hertel and Carmen Binnewies and Stefan Krumm and Heinz Holling and Martin Kleinmann",

booktitle = "Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013",

publisher = "M{\"u}nstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte",

address = "Germany",

note = "16th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology - EAWOP 2013, EAWOP 2013 ; Conference date: 22-05-2013 Through 25-05-2013",

url = "http://www.eawop2013.org/",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Where are we with? A dialectical theory on innovation

AU - Frese, Michael

AU - Rosing, Kathrin

N1 - Conference code: 16

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Innovation, the development of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation.Research produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges. This literature leads to one overwhelming summary: Innovation is paradoxical. As a step toward developing an integrative theory, we applied in 2009 a dialectic perspective to innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoningand to gain a more valid account (Bledow et al., 2009). We would like to give an idea of where we are with this kind of theory. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflictingdemands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. Central to our theorizing at this moment are affective shift models and ambidextrous leadership for innovation.

AB - Innovation, the development of new and useful ideas by individuals, teams, and organizations, lies at the heart of human adaptation.Research produced a wealth of knowledge about how innovation emerges. This literature leads to one overwhelming summary: Innovation is paradoxical. As a step toward developing an integrative theory, we applied in 2009 a dialectic perspective to innovation to overcome limitations of dichotomous reasoningand to gain a more valid account (Bledow et al., 2009). We would like to give an idea of where we are with this kind of theory. We point out that individuals, teams, and organizations need to self-regulate and manage conflictingdemands of innovation and that multiple pathways can lead to idea generation and innovation. Central to our theorizing at this moment are affective shift models and ambidextrous leadership for innovation.

KW - Psychology

KW - Innovation

M3 - Published abstract in conference proceedings

SP - 660

EP - 661

BT - Abstract proceedings of the 16th EAWOP Congress 2013

A2 - Hertel, Guido

A2 - Binnewies, Carmen

A2 - Krumm, Stefan

A2 - Holling, Heinz

A2 - Kleinmann, Martin

PB - Münstersche Informations‐ und Archivsystem multimedialer Inhalte

CY - Münster

T2 - 16th congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology - EAWOP 2013

Y2 - 22 May 2013 through 25 May 2013

ER -