When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake: Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Standard
in: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Jahrgang 13, Nr. 6, 11.2010, S. 741-763.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › begutachtet
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake
T2 - Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations
AU - Trötschel, Roman
AU - Hüffmeier, Joachim
AU - Loschelder, David
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - The present research intends to shed light on an identity-based intergroup effect in negotiations by demonstrating that the mere perception of the negotiation as an instance of intergroup interaction suffices to impair the negotiation process and to deteriorate its outcomes. It was predicted that negotiators’ salient group identities increase their competitive perceptions, reduce their concession behavior, and consequently lead to inferior negotiation outcomes. Study 1 revealed that solo negotiators with salient group identities achieved lower joint outcomes than negotiators with salient individual identities. Study 2 systematically explored the underlying mechanisms of this identity-based intergroup effect by analyzing negotiators’ concession-making behaviors over the course of the negotiation. The results of the second experiment replicate the findings of the first study and further show that the detrimental effect of an identity-based intergroup context will occur in distributive as well as integrative negotiations. The findings of the present research are discussed with respect to their contribution to future research on intergroup negotiation.
AB - The present research intends to shed light on an identity-based intergroup effect in negotiations by demonstrating that the mere perception of the negotiation as an instance of intergroup interaction suffices to impair the negotiation process and to deteriorate its outcomes. It was predicted that negotiators’ salient group identities increase their competitive perceptions, reduce their concession behavior, and consequently lead to inferior negotiation outcomes. Study 1 revealed that solo negotiators with salient group identities achieved lower joint outcomes than negotiators with salient individual identities. Study 2 systematically explored the underlying mechanisms of this identity-based intergroup effect by analyzing negotiators’ concession-making behaviors over the course of the negotiation. The results of the second experiment replicate the findings of the first study and further show that the detrimental effect of an identity-based intergroup context will occur in distributive as well as integrative negotiations. The findings of the present research are discussed with respect to their contribution to future research on intergroup negotiation.
KW - Psychology
KW - concession making
KW - discontinuity effect
KW - distributive and integrative negotiation
KW - intergroup behaviour
KW - social identity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049384847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1368430210374608
DO - 10.1177/1368430210374608
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 13
SP - 741
EP - 763
JO - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
JF - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
SN - 1368-4302
IS - 6
ER -