When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake: Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake: Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations. / Trötschel, Roman; Hüffmeier, Joachim; Loschelder, David.
in: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Jahrgang 13, Nr. 6, 11.2010, S. 741-763.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{914b1233f80f40ca95bb99c08d87c4b4,
title = "When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake: Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations",
abstract = "The present research intends to shed light on an identity-based intergroup effect in negotiations by demonstrating that the mere perception of the negotiation as an instance of intergroup interaction suffices to impair the negotiation process and to deteriorate its outcomes. It was predicted that negotiators{\textquoteright} salient group identities increase their competitive perceptions, reduce their concession behavior, and consequently lead to inferior negotiation outcomes. Study 1 revealed that solo negotiators with salient group identities achieved lower joint outcomes than negotiators with salient individual identities. Study 2 systematically explored the underlying mechanisms of this identity-based intergroup effect by analyzing negotiators{\textquoteright} concession-making behaviors over the course of the negotiation. The results of the second experiment replicate the findings of the first study and further show that the detrimental effect of an identity-based intergroup context will occur in distributive as well as integrative negotiations. The findings of the present research are discussed with respect to their contribution to future research on intergroup negotiation. ",
keywords = "Psychology, concession making, discontinuity effect, distributive and integrative negotiation, intergroup behaviour, social identity",
author = "Roman Tr{\"o}tschel and Joachim H{\"u}ffmeier and David Loschelder",
year = "2010",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1177/1368430210374608",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "741--763",
journal = "Group Processes & Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When yielding pieces of the pie is not a piece of cake

T2 - Identity-based intergroup effects in negotiations

AU - Trötschel, Roman

AU - Hüffmeier, Joachim

AU - Loschelder, David

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - The present research intends to shed light on an identity-based intergroup effect in negotiations by demonstrating that the mere perception of the negotiation as an instance of intergroup interaction suffices to impair the negotiation process and to deteriorate its outcomes. It was predicted that negotiators’ salient group identities increase their competitive perceptions, reduce their concession behavior, and consequently lead to inferior negotiation outcomes. Study 1 revealed that solo negotiators with salient group identities achieved lower joint outcomes than negotiators with salient individual identities. Study 2 systematically explored the underlying mechanisms of this identity-based intergroup effect by analyzing negotiators’ concession-making behaviors over the course of the negotiation. The results of the second experiment replicate the findings of the first study and further show that the detrimental effect of an identity-based intergroup context will occur in distributive as well as integrative negotiations. The findings of the present research are discussed with respect to their contribution to future research on intergroup negotiation.

AB - The present research intends to shed light on an identity-based intergroup effect in negotiations by demonstrating that the mere perception of the negotiation as an instance of intergroup interaction suffices to impair the negotiation process and to deteriorate its outcomes. It was predicted that negotiators’ salient group identities increase their competitive perceptions, reduce their concession behavior, and consequently lead to inferior negotiation outcomes. Study 1 revealed that solo negotiators with salient group identities achieved lower joint outcomes than negotiators with salient individual identities. Study 2 systematically explored the underlying mechanisms of this identity-based intergroup effect by analyzing negotiators’ concession-making behaviors over the course of the negotiation. The results of the second experiment replicate the findings of the first study and further show that the detrimental effect of an identity-based intergroup context will occur in distributive as well as integrative negotiations. The findings of the present research are discussed with respect to their contribution to future research on intergroup negotiation.

KW - Psychology

KW - concession making

KW - discontinuity effect

KW - distributive and integrative negotiation

KW - intergroup behaviour

KW - social identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049384847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368430210374608

DO - 10.1177/1368430210374608

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 13

SP - 741

EP - 763

JO - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 6

ER -

DOI