When one size does not fit all: A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Standard

When one size does not fit all: A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard. / Lueg, Rainer; E'Silva, Ana Luisa Carvalho.
in: Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM), Jahrgang 11, Nr. 3, 2013, S. 86-94.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{77cae41b81c84669a1623847a2538075,
title = "When one size does not fit all: A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard",
abstract = "Robert Kaplan and David Norton emphasize that the four perspectives of their standard balanced scorecard (BSC) need to be adapted to the organizational context. Yet, we lack a coherent body of knowledge on these adaptations. 20 years after the implementation of the BSC, a literature review is warranted to investigate if and how the original BSC has been modified in practice. The authors conduct a systematic literature review of leading academic journals from 1992 to 2012 to identify and analyze the extant empirical evidence on the BSC. The authors find 117 empirical studies on the BSC, of which 27 deal with BSC-modifications. First, the authors conclude that the BSC-perspectives have been modified to match different industries, organizational levels, or functions (e.g., the public sector, information systems, supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, or incentive systems). Second, the authors use an established BSC classification, and argue that the BSC has also been modified in terms of its sophistication. This paper can only identify few examples where the BSC has become an incentive-relevant management system as imagined by Kaplan and Norton; many organizations stop at the level of a measurement system. On the one hand, this article demonstrates the versatility of the BSC and its perspectives as claimed by Kaplan and Norton. On the other hand, the lack of sophisticated implementations shed a critical light on the relevance of the BSC in practice.",
keywords = "Balanced scorecard, Corporate social responsibility, Environment, Implementation, Incentives, Information systems, Literature review, Organizational design, Performance evaluation, Performance measurement system, Public sector, Supply chain management, Management studies",
author = "Rainer Lueg and E'Silva, {Ana Luisa Carvalho}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "86--94",
journal = "Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)",
issn = "1727-7051",
publisher = "Business Perspectives",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When one size does not fit all

T2 - A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard

AU - Lueg, Rainer

AU - E'Silva, Ana Luisa Carvalho

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Robert Kaplan and David Norton emphasize that the four perspectives of their standard balanced scorecard (BSC) need to be adapted to the organizational context. Yet, we lack a coherent body of knowledge on these adaptations. 20 years after the implementation of the BSC, a literature review is warranted to investigate if and how the original BSC has been modified in practice. The authors conduct a systematic literature review of leading academic journals from 1992 to 2012 to identify and analyze the extant empirical evidence on the BSC. The authors find 117 empirical studies on the BSC, of which 27 deal with BSC-modifications. First, the authors conclude that the BSC-perspectives have been modified to match different industries, organizational levels, or functions (e.g., the public sector, information systems, supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, or incentive systems). Second, the authors use an established BSC classification, and argue that the BSC has also been modified in terms of its sophistication. This paper can only identify few examples where the BSC has become an incentive-relevant management system as imagined by Kaplan and Norton; many organizations stop at the level of a measurement system. On the one hand, this article demonstrates the versatility of the BSC and its perspectives as claimed by Kaplan and Norton. On the other hand, the lack of sophisticated implementations shed a critical light on the relevance of the BSC in practice.

AB - Robert Kaplan and David Norton emphasize that the four perspectives of their standard balanced scorecard (BSC) need to be adapted to the organizational context. Yet, we lack a coherent body of knowledge on these adaptations. 20 years after the implementation of the BSC, a literature review is warranted to investigate if and how the original BSC has been modified in practice. The authors conduct a systematic literature review of leading academic journals from 1992 to 2012 to identify and analyze the extant empirical evidence on the BSC. The authors find 117 empirical studies on the BSC, of which 27 deal with BSC-modifications. First, the authors conclude that the BSC-perspectives have been modified to match different industries, organizational levels, or functions (e.g., the public sector, information systems, supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, or incentive systems). Second, the authors use an established BSC classification, and argue that the BSC has also been modified in terms of its sophistication. This paper can only identify few examples where the BSC has become an incentive-relevant management system as imagined by Kaplan and Norton; many organizations stop at the level of a measurement system. On the one hand, this article demonstrates the versatility of the BSC and its perspectives as claimed by Kaplan and Norton. On the other hand, the lack of sophisticated implementations shed a critical light on the relevance of the BSC in practice.

KW - Balanced scorecard

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Environment

KW - Implementation

KW - Incentives

KW - Information systems

KW - Literature review

KW - Organizational design

KW - Performance evaluation

KW - Performance measurement system

KW - Public sector

KW - Supply chain management

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887126435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:84887126435

VL - 11

SP - 86

EP - 94

JO - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)

JF - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)

SN - 1727-7051

IS - 3

ER -