When one size does not fit all: A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM), Jahrgang 11, Nr. 3, 2013, S. 86-94.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - When one size does not fit all
T2 - A literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard
AU - Lueg, Rainer
AU - E'Silva, Ana Luisa Carvalho
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Robert Kaplan and David Norton emphasize that the four perspectives of their standard balanced scorecard (BSC) need to be adapted to the organizational context. Yet, we lack a coherent body of knowledge on these adaptations. 20 years after the implementation of the BSC, a literature review is warranted to investigate if and how the original BSC has been modified in practice. The authors conduct a systematic literature review of leading academic journals from 1992 to 2012 to identify and analyze the extant empirical evidence on the BSC. The authors find 117 empirical studies on the BSC, of which 27 deal with BSC-modifications. First, the authors conclude that the BSC-perspectives have been modified to match different industries, organizational levels, or functions (e.g., the public sector, information systems, supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, or incentive systems). Second, the authors use an established BSC classification, and argue that the BSC has also been modified in terms of its sophistication. This paper can only identify few examples where the BSC has become an incentive-relevant management system as imagined by Kaplan and Norton; many organizations stop at the level of a measurement system. On the one hand, this article demonstrates the versatility of the BSC and its perspectives as claimed by Kaplan and Norton. On the other hand, the lack of sophisticated implementations shed a critical light on the relevance of the BSC in practice.
AB - Robert Kaplan and David Norton emphasize that the four perspectives of their standard balanced scorecard (BSC) need to be adapted to the organizational context. Yet, we lack a coherent body of knowledge on these adaptations. 20 years after the implementation of the BSC, a literature review is warranted to investigate if and how the original BSC has been modified in practice. The authors conduct a systematic literature review of leading academic journals from 1992 to 2012 to identify and analyze the extant empirical evidence on the BSC. The authors find 117 empirical studies on the BSC, of which 27 deal with BSC-modifications. First, the authors conclude that the BSC-perspectives have been modified to match different industries, organizational levels, or functions (e.g., the public sector, information systems, supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, or incentive systems). Second, the authors use an established BSC classification, and argue that the BSC has also been modified in terms of its sophistication. This paper can only identify few examples where the BSC has become an incentive-relevant management system as imagined by Kaplan and Norton; many organizations stop at the level of a measurement system. On the one hand, this article demonstrates the versatility of the BSC and its perspectives as claimed by Kaplan and Norton. On the other hand, the lack of sophisticated implementations shed a critical light on the relevance of the BSC in practice.
KW - Balanced scorecard
KW - Corporate social responsibility
KW - Environment
KW - Implementation
KW - Incentives
KW - Information systems
KW - Literature review
KW - Organizational design
KW - Performance evaluation
KW - Performance measurement system
KW - Public sector
KW - Supply chain management
KW - Management studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887126435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Scientific review articles
AN - SCOPUS:84887126435
VL - 11
SP - 86
EP - 94
JO - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)
JF - Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM)
SN - 1727-7051
IS - 3
ER -