What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example

Karolin Gieseler; David D. Loschelder; Malte Friese

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet

Standard

What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example. / Gieseler, Karolin; Loschelder, David D.; Friese, Malte.
Social Psychology in Action : Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice. Hrsg. / Kai Sassenberg; Michael L. W. Vliek. Cham: Springer Nature AG, 2019. S. 3-21.

Publikation: Beiträge in Sammelwerken › Kapitel › begutachtet

Harvard

Gieseler, K, Loschelder, DD & Friese, M 2019, What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example. in K Sassenberg & MLW Vliek (Hrsg.), Social Psychology in Action : Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice. Springer Nature AG, Cham, S. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

APA

Gieseler, K., Loschelder, D. D., & Friese, M. (2019). What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example. In K. Sassenberg, & M. L. W. Vliek (Hrsg.), Social Psychology in Action : Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice (S. 3-21). Springer Nature AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

Vancouver

Gieseler K, Loschelder DD, Friese M. What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example. in Sassenberg K, Vliek MLW, Hrsg., Social Psychology in Action : Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice. Cham: Springer Nature AG. 2019. S. 3-21 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

Bibtex

@inbook{cb98caa80b7e4904b20bdeede730c2b1,

title = "What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example",

abstract = "This chapter adopts a metascientific perspective and discusses two basic questions: (1) What are criteria for evaluating the quality of a psychological theory? (2) What are criteria for evaluating the empirical evidence related to a theory? The chapter discusses these criteria on a general level and by examining one specific theory and accompanying empirical work as an illustrative example—the Strength Model of Self-Control by Baumeister and colleagues (Baumeister and Heatherton Psychol Inq 7:1–15, 1996; Baumeister and Vohs Adv Exp Soc Psychol 54:67–127, 2016). Although necessarily incomplete, the discussed criteria for the quality of theorizing and empiricism can be applied to many theories in (social) psychological research. They are therefore relevant not only to basic research, but also to any applied work that is grounded in theory.",

keywords = "Business psychology, Ego depletion, Meta science, Self-control, Strength Model, Theory evaluation",

author = "Karolin Gieseler and Loschelder, {David D.} and Malte Friese",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-13787-8",

pages = "3--21",

editor = "Sassenberg, {Kai } and Vliek, {Michael L. W. }",

booktitle = "Social Psychology in Action",

publisher = "Springer Nature AG",

address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - What Makes for a Good Theory? How to Evaluate a Theory Using the Strength Model of Self-Control as an Example

AU - Gieseler, Karolin

AU - Loschelder, David D.

AU - Friese, Malte

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This chapter adopts a metascientific perspective and discusses two basic questions: (1) What are criteria for evaluating the quality of a psychological theory? (2) What are criteria for evaluating the empirical evidence related to a theory? The chapter discusses these criteria on a general level and by examining one specific theory and accompanying empirical work as an illustrative example—the Strength Model of Self-Control by Baumeister and colleagues (Baumeister and Heatherton Psychol Inq 7:1–15, 1996; Baumeister and Vohs Adv Exp Soc Psychol 54:67–127, 2016). Although necessarily incomplete, the discussed criteria for the quality of theorizing and empiricism can be applied to many theories in (social) psychological research. They are therefore relevant not only to basic research, but also to any applied work that is grounded in theory.

AB - This chapter adopts a metascientific perspective and discusses two basic questions: (1) What are criteria for evaluating the quality of a psychological theory? (2) What are criteria for evaluating the empirical evidence related to a theory? The chapter discusses these criteria on a general level and by examining one specific theory and accompanying empirical work as an illustrative example—the Strength Model of Self-Control by Baumeister and colleagues (Baumeister and Heatherton Psychol Inq 7:1–15, 1996; Baumeister and Vohs Adv Exp Soc Psychol 54:67–127, 2016). Although necessarily incomplete, the discussed criteria for the quality of theorizing and empiricism can be applied to many theories in (social) psychological research. They are therefore relevant not only to basic research, but also to any applied work that is grounded in theory.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Ego depletion

KW - Meta science

KW - Self-control

KW - Strength Model

KW - Theory evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115307232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/59561634-cf93-34a0-bca4-7a2e15d6d909/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-13787-8

SP - 3

EP - 21

BT - Social Psychology in Action

A2 - Sassenberg, Kai

A2 - Vliek, Michael L. W.

PB - Springer Nature AG

CY - Cham

ER -

Weitere Publikationen dieser Person(en)

Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries

Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., Pronizius, E., Broek, K. L. V. D., Vlasceanu, D., Constantino, S., Morais, M. J., Schumann, P., Rathje, S., Fang, K., Aglioti, S. M., Alfano, M., Alvarado-Yepez, A. J., Andersen, A., Anseel, F., Apps, M. A. J., Asadli, C., Awuor, F. J., Azevedo, F., Basaglia, P., Bélanger, J. J., Berger, S., Bertin, P., Białek, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Blaya-Burgo, M., Bleize, D. N. M., Bø, S., Boecker, L., Boggio, P. S., Borau, S., Bos, B., Bouguettaya, A., Brauer, M., Brick, C., Brik, T., Briker, R., Brosch, T., Buchel, O., Buonauro, D., Butalia, R., Carvacho, H., Chamberlain, S. A. E., Chan, H-Y., Chow, D., Chung, D., Cian, L., Cohen-Eick, N., Contreras-Huerta, L. S., Contu, D., Cristea, V., Cutler, J., D'Ottone, S., Keersmaecker, J. D., Delcourt, S., Delouvée, S., Diel, K., Douglas, B. D., Drupp, M. A., Dubey, S., Ekmanis, J., Elbaek, C. T., Elsherif, M., Engelhard, I. M., Escher, Y. A., Etienne, T. W., Farage, L., Farias, A. R., Feuerriegel, S., Findor, A., Freira, L., Friese, M., Gains, N. P., Gallyamova, A., Geiger, S. J., Genschow, O., Gjoneska, B., Gkinopoulos, T., Goldberg, B., Goldenberg, A., Gradidge, S., Grassini, S., Gray, K., Grelle, S., Griffin, S. M., Grigoryan, L., Grigoryan, A., Grigoryev, D., Gruber, J., Guilaran, J., Hadar, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., Halperin, E., Harvey, A. J., Haugestad, C. A. P., Herman, A. M., Hershfield, H. E., Himichi, T., Hine, D. W., Hofmann, W., Howe, L., Huaman-Chulluncuy, E. T., Huang, G., Ishii, T., Ito, A., Jia, F., Jost, J. T., Jovanović, V., Jurgiel, D., Kácha, O., Kankaanpää, R., Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Mintz, K. K., Kaya, I., Kaya, O., Khachatryan, N., Klas, A., Klein, C., Klöckner, C. A., Koppel, L., Kosachenko, A. I., Kothe, E. J., Krebs, R., Krosch, A. R., Krouwel, A. P. M., Kyrychenko, Y., Lagomarsino, M., Lamm, C., Lange, F., Cunningham, J. L., Lees, J., Leung, T. Y., Levy, N., Lockwood, P. L., Longoni, C., Ortega, A. L., Loschelder, D. D., Lu, J. G., Luo, Y., Luomba, J., Lutz, A. E., Majer, J. M., Markowitz, E., Marsh, A. A., Mascarenhas, K. L., Mbilingi, B., Mbungu, W., McHugh, C., Meijers, M. H. C., Mercier, H., Mhagama, F. L., Michalakis, K., Mikus, N., Milliron, S., Mitkidis, P., Monge-Rodríguez, F. S., Mora, Y. L., Moreau, D., Motoki, K., Moyano, M., Mus, M., Navajas, J., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, D. M., Nguyen, T., Niemi, L., Nijssen, S. R. R., Nilsonne, G., Nitschke, J. P., Nockur, L., Okura, R., Öner, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Palumbo, H., Panagopoulos, C., Panasiti, M. S., Pärnamets, P., Paruzel-Czachura, M., Pavlov, Y. G., Payán-Gómez, C., Pearson, A. R., Costa, L. P. D., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Pham, N. T., Ponizovskiy, V., Pretus, C., Rêgo, G. G., Reimann, R., Rhoads, S. A., Riano-Moreno, J., Richter, I., Röer, J. P., Rosa-Sullivan, J., Ross, R. M., Sabherwal, A., Saito, T., Sarrasin, O., Say, N., Schmid, K., Schmitt, M. T., Schoenegger, P., Scholz, C., Schug, M. G., Schulreich, S., Shreedhar, G., Shuman, E., Sivan, S., Sjåstad, H., Soliman, M., Soud, K., Spampatti, T., Sparkman, G., Spasovski, O., Stanley, S. K., Stern, J. A., Strahm, N., Suko, Y., Sul, S., Syropoulos, S., Taylor, N. C., Tedaldi, E., Tinghög, G., Huynh, L. D. T., Travaglino, G. A., Tsakiris, M., Tüter, İ., Tyrala, M., Uluğ, Ö. M., Urbanek, A., Valko, D., Linden, S. V. D., Schie, K. V., Stekelenburg, A. V., Vanags, E., Västfjäll, D., Vesely, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wanguche, P. O., Willer, R., Wojcik, A. D., Xu, R., Yadav, A., Zawisza, M., Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Żuk, D. & Bavel, J. J. V., 09.02.2024, in: Science Advances. 10, 6, 19 S., eadj5778.