What is Social Learning? Response to Pahl-Wostl. 2006. “The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionalityof Rivers and Floodplains”

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

What is Social Learning? Response to Pahl-Wostl. 2006. “The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionalityof Rivers and Floodplains”. / Reed, Mark S.; Evely, Anna C.; Cundill, Georgina et al.
in: Ecology and Society, Jahrgang 15, Nr. 4, 12.2010.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{70d3cc931d9e40ada2748c237d17b8f8,
title = "What is Social Learning?: Response to Pahl-Wostl. 2006. “The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionalityof Rivers and Floodplains”",
abstract = "Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Communication, social learning, social-ecological systems, definition, Definition, Social learning, Social-ecological systems",
author = "Reed, {Mark S.} and Evely, {Anna C.} and Georgina Cundill and Ioan Fazey and Jayne Glass and Adele Laing and Jens Newig and Brad Parrish and Christina Prell and Chris Raymond and Lindsay Stringer",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
doi = "10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is Social Learning?

T2 - Response to Pahl-Wostl. 2006. “The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionalityof Rivers and Floodplains”

AU - Reed, Mark S.

AU - Evely, Anna C.

AU - Cundill, Georgina

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Glass, Jayne

AU - Laing, Adele

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Parrish, Brad

AU - Prell, Christina

AU - Raymond, Chris

AU - Stringer, Lindsay

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.

AB - Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy. However, there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis. There are still considerable differences in understanding of the concept in the literature, including a number of articles published in Ecology & Society. Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning. We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must: (1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved; (2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and (3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network. A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Communication

KW - social learning

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - definition

KW - Definition

KW - Social learning

KW - Social-ecological systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751479489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a02b9543-8384-3568-bc37-c77d5c84db66/

U2 - 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01

DO - 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 15

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

ER -

Links

DOI