Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions. / Stremmel, Gesa; Elshiewy, Ossama; Boztug, Yasemin et al.
in: Appetite, Jahrgang 175, 106048, 01.08.2022.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Stremmel, G., Elshiewy, O., Boztug, Y., & Carneiro-Otto, F. (2022). Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions. Appetite, 175, Artikel 106048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048

Vancouver

Stremmel G, Elshiewy O, Boztug Y, Carneiro-Otto F. Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions. Appetite. 2022 Aug 1;175:106048. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048

Bibtex

@article{2be6e01601e346a78877321d9eba4c11,
title = "Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions",
abstract = "Given the increasing popularity of vegan labels, our study examines the effect of vegan labeling on product perceptions and consumption intentions. We focus on randomly-vegan products which are products that have neither undergone any special reformulation to be vegan nor explicitly aim to serve the market segment of vegans and vegetarians. Food marketers are often tempted to add a vegan label to their randomly-vegan products to capitalize on the growing popularity of vegan food. Our results show that labeling randomly-vegan products biases the perceived healthiness, expected taste, and perceived sustainability, but only if consumers do not expect such randomly-vegan products to be vegan by default. This translates into altered consumption intentions for these unexpected-vegan products with a vegan label (vs. no label). Importantly, this applies to both utilitarian and hedonic products. No effects attributed to the vegan label (vs. no label) were found for randomly-vegan products that consumers expected to be vegan by default.",
keywords = "Food labeling, Halo effect, Vegan, Management studies, Economics",
author = "Gesa Stremmel and Ossama Elshiewy and Yasemin Boztug and Fernanda Carneiro-Otto",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048",
language = "English",
volume = "175",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vegan labeling for what is already vegan

T2 - Product perceptions and consumption intentions

AU - Stremmel, Gesa

AU - Elshiewy, Ossama

AU - Boztug, Yasemin

AU - Carneiro-Otto, Fernanda

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/8/1

Y1 - 2022/8/1

N2 - Given the increasing popularity of vegan labels, our study examines the effect of vegan labeling on product perceptions and consumption intentions. We focus on randomly-vegan products which are products that have neither undergone any special reformulation to be vegan nor explicitly aim to serve the market segment of vegans and vegetarians. Food marketers are often tempted to add a vegan label to their randomly-vegan products to capitalize on the growing popularity of vegan food. Our results show that labeling randomly-vegan products biases the perceived healthiness, expected taste, and perceived sustainability, but only if consumers do not expect such randomly-vegan products to be vegan by default. This translates into altered consumption intentions for these unexpected-vegan products with a vegan label (vs. no label). Importantly, this applies to both utilitarian and hedonic products. No effects attributed to the vegan label (vs. no label) were found for randomly-vegan products that consumers expected to be vegan by default.

AB - Given the increasing popularity of vegan labels, our study examines the effect of vegan labeling on product perceptions and consumption intentions. We focus on randomly-vegan products which are products that have neither undergone any special reformulation to be vegan nor explicitly aim to serve the market segment of vegans and vegetarians. Food marketers are often tempted to add a vegan label to their randomly-vegan products to capitalize on the growing popularity of vegan food. Our results show that labeling randomly-vegan products biases the perceived healthiness, expected taste, and perceived sustainability, but only if consumers do not expect such randomly-vegan products to be vegan by default. This translates into altered consumption intentions for these unexpected-vegan products with a vegan label (vs. no label). Importantly, this applies to both utilitarian and hedonic products. No effects attributed to the vegan label (vs. no label) were found for randomly-vegan products that consumers expected to be vegan by default.

KW - Food labeling

KW - Halo effect

KW - Vegan

KW - Management studies

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130528740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8e719473-7116-3065-9d26-3f4307a753f5/

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 35430296

AN - SCOPUS:85130528740

VL - 175

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

M1 - 106048

ER -

DOI