Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions - Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions - Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. / Rauschmayer, Felix; Bauler, Tom; Schäpke, Niko.
in: Ecological Economics, Jahrgang 109, 01.01.2015, S. 211-221.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e8d90142745d44cbb69896d1f1dec80b,
title = "Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions - Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices",
abstract = "Scientific activities which are targeted to engage and enact on societal problems - and governance of sustainability transition itself is one such activity - are necessarily prescriptive endeavours, have to recognize the fundamental normativity of sustainable development, need to be based on a thick description of the issues to change, and should embrace the multi-dimensional importance that individuals take in societal change. Societally relevant research on and for sustainability transitions therefore has to produce systems, target, as well as transformative knowledge. The challenges of sustainability transitions require furthermore that the individual and the societal levels have to be linked as to relate individual agency and structural change within the different knowledge types. Taking transition management as a rather obvious starting point to enrich the concept of sustainability transitions, the paper elaborates that its conceptual basis is too thin to address the first two types of knowledge. In its current elaborations, transition management does furthermore not cover individual agency as potential driver of transitions. We therefore suggest complementing transition management approaches with the more descriptive practice theory and the more normative and individualistic capability approach. We suggest a heuristic combination that places individuals back into the study of sustainability transitions.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, conceptual framework, governance approach, knowledge; sustainability, Sustainable development, theoretical study, management practice, transition management, capability approach, practice theory, transdisciplinarity, sustainability transitions",
author = "Felix Rauschmayer and Tom Bauler and Niko Sch{\"a}pke",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "211--221",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions - Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices

AU - Rauschmayer, Felix

AU - Bauler, Tom

AU - Schäpke, Niko

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Scientific activities which are targeted to engage and enact on societal problems - and governance of sustainability transition itself is one such activity - are necessarily prescriptive endeavours, have to recognize the fundamental normativity of sustainable development, need to be based on a thick description of the issues to change, and should embrace the multi-dimensional importance that individuals take in societal change. Societally relevant research on and for sustainability transitions therefore has to produce systems, target, as well as transformative knowledge. The challenges of sustainability transitions require furthermore that the individual and the societal levels have to be linked as to relate individual agency and structural change within the different knowledge types. Taking transition management as a rather obvious starting point to enrich the concept of sustainability transitions, the paper elaborates that its conceptual basis is too thin to address the first two types of knowledge. In its current elaborations, transition management does furthermore not cover individual agency as potential driver of transitions. We therefore suggest complementing transition management approaches with the more descriptive practice theory and the more normative and individualistic capability approach. We suggest a heuristic combination that places individuals back into the study of sustainability transitions.

AB - Scientific activities which are targeted to engage and enact on societal problems - and governance of sustainability transition itself is one such activity - are necessarily prescriptive endeavours, have to recognize the fundamental normativity of sustainable development, need to be based on a thick description of the issues to change, and should embrace the multi-dimensional importance that individuals take in societal change. Societally relevant research on and for sustainability transitions therefore has to produce systems, target, as well as transformative knowledge. The challenges of sustainability transitions require furthermore that the individual and the societal levels have to be linked as to relate individual agency and structural change within the different knowledge types. Taking transition management as a rather obvious starting point to enrich the concept of sustainability transitions, the paper elaborates that its conceptual basis is too thin to address the first two types of knowledge. In its current elaborations, transition management does furthermore not cover individual agency as potential driver of transitions. We therefore suggest complementing transition management approaches with the more descriptive practice theory and the more normative and individualistic capability approach. We suggest a heuristic combination that places individuals back into the study of sustainability transitions.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - conceptual framework

KW - governance approach

KW - knowledge; sustainability

KW - Sustainable development

KW - theoretical study

KW - management practice

KW - transition management

KW - capability approach

KW - practice theory

KW - transdisciplinarity

KW - sustainability transitions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949117714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 109

SP - 211

EP - 221

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Michael Rathje

Publikationen

  1. The Return of History - An Exchange between Christoph Behnke, Cornelia Kastelan, and Ulf Wuggenig
  2. Hydration and Dehydration of CaO/ Ca(OH)2 and CaCl2 / CaCl2 * 6 H2O– TGA/ DSC studies
  3. Structure matters
  4. Influence of strontium, silicon and calcium additions on the properties of the AM50 alloy
  5. Frontiers of Democracy (Special Issue)
  6. Evaluierung medizinischer Volumenrendering-Algorithmen durch empirische Studien
  7. Peer Evaluation Can Reliably Measure Local Knowledge
  8. 303, MPC, A/D
  9. Comparing U.S. and German Cost Accounting Methods
  10. Social movements in defense of public water services
  11. The Role of Linked Social-Ecological Systems in a Mobile Agent-Based Ecosystem Service from Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) in an Indigenous Community Forest in Palawan, Philippines
  12. Versteigern statt Verschenken!
  13. Intrinsic Motivation in Bilingual Courses on Bionics and Molecular Biology in an Out-of-School Lab
  14. Exkursion in die Coy-Galaxis
  15. Towards a decision support system for radiotherapy business continuity in a pandemic crisis
  16. Konstruktive Kritik
  17. Outsourcing
  18. From grief to hope in conservation
  19. Edvard Munch
  20. Skizze
  21. Die Liebe zur Kunst
  22. Monodominance in tropical forests: modelling reveals emerging clusters and phase transitions
  23. Managing uncertainty in the marketing of new-technology products
  24. Productivity and the Product Scope of Multi-Product Firms: A Test of Feenstra-Ma
  25. Academic self-concept and causal attributions for success and failure amongst elementary school children
  26. On Knowing Too Much
  27. How well do parents do on PISA ?