The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach. / Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana; Zaman, Sara; Filyushkina, Anna et al.
in: Ecosystems and People, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 1, 2022, S. 498-513.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6d9e838fb23e4007b681c2a58842ea8f,
title = "The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management: relevance for a collaborative approach",
abstract = "Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of {\"O}sterg{\"o}tland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes.",
keywords = "consensus, experiential knowledge, Human values, inclusivity, reflexivity, Rosemary Hill, soft systems thinking, Ecosystems Research, Biology",
author = "Horcea-Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and Sara Zaman and Anna Filyushkina and L{\'o}pez-Rodr{\'i}guez, {Maria D.} and Cebri{\'a}n-Piqueras, {Miguel A.} and Raymond, {Christopher M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "498--513",
journal = "Ecosystems and People",
issn = "2639-5908",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between values and knowledge in visioning for landscape management

T2 - relevance for a collaborative approach

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Zaman, Sara

AU - Filyushkina, Anna

AU - López-Rodríguez, Maria D.

AU - Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of Östergötland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes.

AB - Respecting connections between the diversity of values and forms of knowledge is essential to support a decision-making that fosters relationships between ecosystems and people. However, little theory has been developed for clarifying interactions between values and knowledge, and their relevance for environmental policy. We surfaced the overlooked relationship between values and knowledge by studying individual cognitive and emotional processes during a guided visioning exercise in the context of the multifunctional landscapes of Östergötland, Sweden. We investigated these cognitive processes using 30 semi-structured interviews and questionnaires organized around three types of relationships: vision ⇔ values, vision ⇔ knowledge, and especially values ⇔ knowledge. The analysis of the relationship between vision and values reveals that all types of values including core human values, relational, and intrinsic values are important in shaping the decision-making context in which landscape management visions arise. The relationship between vision and knowledge uncovers the mix of experiential and theoretical knowledge that informs the decision-making context. Interviews unfold three modalities in terms of how values and knowledge relate: i) linked and not necessarily connected (e.g. when individuals perceive a high conflict between their knowledge and their values leading to one construct silencing the other); ii) mutually reinforcing (e.g. when values and knowledge are seen as feeding into one another); and iii) intertwined (e.g. when individuals perceive that values and knowledge can co-exist). We discuss our findings in the context of their relevance for a collaborative decision-making process for balancing consensus and dissensus in multifunctional landscapes.

KW - consensus

KW - experiential knowledge

KW - Human values

KW - inclusivity

KW - reflexivity

KW - Rosemary Hill

KW - soft systems thinking

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136478727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85136478727

VL - 18

SP - 498

EP - 513

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Exploring the potential of using priority effects during ecological restoration to resist biological invasions in the neotropics
  2. Resort
  3. Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research
  4. Constructing Identities and Narrating the Self: Sherman Alexie’s Flight as a Fictional Memoir
  5. Unobtrusive Measurement of Vital Signs Through Ultra-Wideband Sensing in the Domain of AAL
  6. Theme zones in contrast
  7. Two types of ‘enough’
  8. Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task
  9. Digitalization
  10. Union membership and age: the inverted u-shape hypothesis under test
  11. Wie lang sollte eine Rollstuhlrampe sein?
  12. Introduction to the Psychology of Entrepreneurship
  13. Standing Still
  14. UAV remote laser scanner improvement by continuous scanning using DC motors
  15. Can not wanting to know be responsible?
  16. Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Schools
  17. New validated liquid chromatographic and chemometrics-assisted UV spectroscopic methods for the determination of two multicomponent cough mixtures in syrup.
  18. Efficacy of trapping techniques (pitfall, ramp and arboreal traps) for capturing spiders
  19. Non-native populations of an invasive tree outperform their native conspecifics
  20. Tracking the fate of aluminium in the eu using the matrace model
  21. Scaffolding, software and scenarios
  22. Distinguishing between struggling and skilled readers based on their prosodic speech patterns in oral reading
  23. Closed-Loop Supply Chain Management - Eine Simulationsstudie
  24. Between mutuality, autonomy and domination
  25. Tormentil for active ulcerative colitis
  26. Street Wisdom
  27. Biomass derived ionic liquids
  28. What Is Popular Art?