The new US horizontal merger guidelines: International divergence in merger review ?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Standard

The new US horizontal merger guidelines: International divergence in merger review ? / Reindl, Andreas.
in: Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence, Jahrgang 2010, Nr. 4, 32961, 12.2010.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{53f6372e06474d298353e9919c0e9afe,
title = "The new US horizontal merger guidelines: International divergence in merger review ?",
abstract = "One of the most controversial aspects in the recently adopted U.S. horizontal merger guidelines has been the “downgrading” of market definition and market shares in the analysis of differentiated products mergers. Observers have argued that the guidelines not only create too much agency discretion and flexibility at the cost of consistent analysis and predictability, but also undermine international consensus and set a bad example for other jurisdictions. The note considers that, on the contrary, the U.S. agencies{\textquoteright} approach to differentiated products mergers is consistent with the approach of other leading competition authorities and will likely shape international consensus in merger review. It appears unlikely that this approach will reduce analytical rigor in merger review and lead to more aggressive merger enforcement with an increased number of mergers that competition authorities seek to challenge.",
keywords = "Commercial law, United States of America, Mergers, Market definition, High market shares, Institutions",
author = "Andreas Reindl",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
language = "English",
volume = "2010",
journal = "Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence",
issn = "1773-9578",
publisher = "Institut de droit de la concurrence",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The new US horizontal merger guidelines

T2 - International divergence in merger review ?

AU - Reindl, Andreas

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - One of the most controversial aspects in the recently adopted U.S. horizontal merger guidelines has been the “downgrading” of market definition and market shares in the analysis of differentiated products mergers. Observers have argued that the guidelines not only create too much agency discretion and flexibility at the cost of consistent analysis and predictability, but also undermine international consensus and set a bad example for other jurisdictions. The note considers that, on the contrary, the U.S. agencies’ approach to differentiated products mergers is consistent with the approach of other leading competition authorities and will likely shape international consensus in merger review. It appears unlikely that this approach will reduce analytical rigor in merger review and lead to more aggressive merger enforcement with an increased number of mergers that competition authorities seek to challenge.

AB - One of the most controversial aspects in the recently adopted U.S. horizontal merger guidelines has been the “downgrading” of market definition and market shares in the analysis of differentiated products mergers. Observers have argued that the guidelines not only create too much agency discretion and flexibility at the cost of consistent analysis and predictability, but also undermine international consensus and set a bad example for other jurisdictions. The note considers that, on the contrary, the U.S. agencies’ approach to differentiated products mergers is consistent with the approach of other leading competition authorities and will likely shape international consensus in merger review. It appears unlikely that this approach will reduce analytical rigor in merger review and lead to more aggressive merger enforcement with an increased number of mergers that competition authorities seek to challenge.

KW - Commercial law

KW - United States of America

KW - Mergers

KW - Market definition

KW - High market shares

KW - Institutions

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 2010

JO - Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence

JF - Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence

SN - 1773-9578

IS - 4

M1 - 32961

ER -