Shedding Some Light on Economics in Philippians: Phil 4:10–20 and the Socio-Economic Situation of the Community

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKommentare / Debatten / BerichteForschung

Authors

This essay considers what conclusions may be drawn concerning the socio-economic situation of the Philippian community from Paul’s response to the Philippians’ gift in Phil 4:10–20. It contributes to the recent discussions of the socio-economic situation of the Pauline communities, as well as to the current understanding of the possibilities, challenges, and limitations of a social-scientific interpretation of this letter. Phil 4:10–20 includes several potential hints about the Philippians’ socio-economic situation. These could indicate that their situation is quite precarious under shifting economic circumstances. Immediately after Paul founded the community, the Philippians supported him twice (4:15f). Afterward, however, they did not have the opportunity to do so, although they kept it in mind (4:10: ἐφ’ ᾧ καὶ ἐφρονεῖτε, ἠκαιρεῖσθε δέ). Eventually, they were able to send another, apparently large, gift to the imprisoned apostle (4:18). As a part of his response to this gift, Paul explicates his self-sufficient lifestyle (4:11–13), possibly as an example for the Philippians. He also promises them that God will satisfy all their needs (4:19), which may be understood as a consolation in view of socio-economic distress. This study reconsiders the potential socio-scientific interpretations of these hints. It explores to what extent they (even collectively) may shed light on the socio-economic situation of the Philippian community. In doing so, it also points out the uncertainties and challenges such an interpretation must address. It thus shows how the scope of social-scientific interpretation, at least in this case, is limited.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer650
ZeitschriftReligions
Jahrgang15
Ausgabenummer6
Anzahl der Seiten9
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 06.2024

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the author.

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Feeline Massonne

Publikationen

  1. Cognition, consciousness and business ethics - the role of implicit social cognition in moral management behaviour
  2. Alltägliche Unterrichtsplanung und -analyse in konstruktivistischer Perspektive
  3. Psychometric Properties of the Online Arabic Versions of BDI-II, HSCL-25, and PDS
  4. Öffentlicher Raum
  5. Biogeographical patterns in the diet of the wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, in Eurasia: Factors affecting the trophic diversity
  6. Preferences for health insurance and health status
  7. Eco-Control para la Gestión Ambiental
  8. Species-specific responses of wood growth to flooding and climate in floodplain forests in central Germany
  9. Fragenbox Mathematik
  10. Which is the ‘right’ choice of the market portfolio of the CAPM?
  11. Kontextualisierung im nicht-präferierten Format
  12. Crises and Entrepreneurial Opportunities
  13. Repatriate knowledge transfer
  14. Illusio Fachkräftemangel
  15. Task-in-Process in Breakout Rooms eines aufgabenbasierten Videokonferenzprojekts
  16. Preference for violent electronic games and aggressive behavior among children
  17. International experience makes a difference
  18. Gender equality and democracy
  19. Transport of perfluoroalkyl acids in a water-saturated sediment column investigated under near-natural conditions
  20. Ein Beitrag durch wertorientiertes Umweltmanagement
  21. Selbständige Arbeitnehmer oder abhängige Selbständige?
  22. Familie im Zentrum?
  23. Ladwig, Bernd (2020): Politische Philosophie der Tierrechte
  24. Sustainability as a Fundamental Challenge for Management Accountants
  25. Merkmalsextraktion und semantische Integration von Ultrabreitband-Sensoren zur Erkennung von Notfällen
  26. Serious Games for Health
  27. Vollrauschtatbestand und unsicherer Rauschgrad
  28. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antifungal Agents in Hematological Patients
  29. Vierzig Jahre "Überwachen und Strafen"
  30. ‘The song factories have closed!’