Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Standard

Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’. / O’connor, Francis; Lindekilde, Lasse; Malthaner, Stefan.
The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Hrsg. / Joel Busher; Leena Malkki; Sarah Marsden. Taylor and Francis Inc., 2023. S. 213-230.

Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelbegutachtet

Harvard

O’connor, F, Lindekilde, L & Malthaner, S 2023, Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’. in J Busher, L Malkki & S Marsden (Hrsg.), The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Taylor and Francis Inc., S. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035848-16

APA

O’connor, F., Lindekilde, L., & Malthaner, S. (2023). Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’. In J. Busher, L. Malkki, & S. Marsden (Hrsg.), The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation (S. 213-230). Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035848-16

Vancouver

O’connor F, Lindekilde L, Malthaner S. Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’. in Busher J, Malkki L, Marsden S, Hrsg., The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Taylor and Francis Inc. 2023. S. 213-230 doi: 10.4324/9781003035848-16

Bibtex

@inbook{290bcc7ed4f948fb8b91376dcc56c26a,
title = "Radicalisation of {\textquoteleft}lone actors{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Lone-actor terrorism is a low-frequency phenomenon. Many people adopt extremist or radical views that endorse the use of violence, but only an infinitesimal minority ever conduct individual acts of violence or terrorism. Moreover, lone-actor terrorists are often thought to prepare and perpetrate violent attacks on their own but also as predominantly {\textquoteleft}self-radicalized{\textquoteright} individuals. How are they socialised into radical worldviews and/or how do they adopt violent forms of action without the support of militant groups and radical milieus? Research in recent years has confirmed that so-called lone actors are in fact not as {\textquoteleft}lone{\textquoteright} as the description seems to suggest. As much as collective radicalisation is a relational process driven by interactions with other individuals, movements, and institutions in one{\textquoteright}s immediate social environment, lone-actor radicalisation is similarly relationally informed. The {\textquoteleft}loneness{\textquoteright} of lone actors is always relative and never absolute and is itself a form of relational configuration. Drawing on the Lone Actor Radicalisation and Terrorism (LART) dataset (N=306), this chapter identifies the emergence and development of the field, with a particular focus on the most recent innovations and transformations of lone-actor radicalisation. The chapter makes the case for a relational perspective. We argue that, in addition to examining the social and personal backgrounds and histories of these perpetrators, we need to examine the dynamic social processes in which lone-actor attacks are embedded, as shaped and driven by online as well as offline relations and interactions.",
keywords = "Sociology",
author = "Francis O{\textquoteright}connor and Lasse Lindekilde and Stefan Malthaner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 selection and editorial matter, Joel Busher, Leena Malkki and Sarah Marsden; individual chapters, the contributors.",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781003035848-16",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-367-47684-7",
pages = "213--230",
editor = "Joel Busher and Leena Malkki and Sarah Marsden",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Radicalisation of ‘lone actors’

AU - O’connor, Francis

AU - Lindekilde, Lasse

AU - Malthaner, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Joel Busher, Leena Malkki and Sarah Marsden; individual chapters, the contributors.

PY - 2023/1/1

Y1 - 2023/1/1

N2 - Lone-actor terrorism is a low-frequency phenomenon. Many people adopt extremist or radical views that endorse the use of violence, but only an infinitesimal minority ever conduct individual acts of violence or terrorism. Moreover, lone-actor terrorists are often thought to prepare and perpetrate violent attacks on their own but also as predominantly ‘self-radicalized’ individuals. How are they socialised into radical worldviews and/or how do they adopt violent forms of action without the support of militant groups and radical milieus? Research in recent years has confirmed that so-called lone actors are in fact not as ‘lone’ as the description seems to suggest. As much as collective radicalisation is a relational process driven by interactions with other individuals, movements, and institutions in one’s immediate social environment, lone-actor radicalisation is similarly relationally informed. The ‘loneness’ of lone actors is always relative and never absolute and is itself a form of relational configuration. Drawing on the Lone Actor Radicalisation and Terrorism (LART) dataset (N=306), this chapter identifies the emergence and development of the field, with a particular focus on the most recent innovations and transformations of lone-actor radicalisation. The chapter makes the case for a relational perspective. We argue that, in addition to examining the social and personal backgrounds and histories of these perpetrators, we need to examine the dynamic social processes in which lone-actor attacks are embedded, as shaped and driven by online as well as offline relations and interactions.

AB - Lone-actor terrorism is a low-frequency phenomenon. Many people adopt extremist or radical views that endorse the use of violence, but only an infinitesimal minority ever conduct individual acts of violence or terrorism. Moreover, lone-actor terrorists are often thought to prepare and perpetrate violent attacks on their own but also as predominantly ‘self-radicalized’ individuals. How are they socialised into radical worldviews and/or how do they adopt violent forms of action without the support of militant groups and radical milieus? Research in recent years has confirmed that so-called lone actors are in fact not as ‘lone’ as the description seems to suggest. As much as collective radicalisation is a relational process driven by interactions with other individuals, movements, and institutions in one’s immediate social environment, lone-actor radicalisation is similarly relationally informed. The ‘loneness’ of lone actors is always relative and never absolute and is itself a form of relational configuration. Drawing on the Lone Actor Radicalisation and Terrorism (LART) dataset (N=306), this chapter identifies the emergence and development of the field, with a particular focus on the most recent innovations and transformations of lone-actor radicalisation. The chapter makes the case for a relational perspective. We argue that, in addition to examining the social and personal backgrounds and histories of these perpetrators, we need to examine the dynamic social processes in which lone-actor attacks are embedded, as shaped and driven by online as well as offline relations and interactions.

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176825345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ac4fe983-5a57-3a02-93a8-44893adf45db/

U2 - 10.4324/9781003035848-16

DO - 10.4324/9781003035848-16

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85176825345

SN - 978-0-367-47684-7

SN - 978-1-032-57380-9

SP - 213

EP - 230

BT - The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation

A2 - Busher, Joel

A2 - Malkki, Leena

A2 - Marsden, Sarah

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Imagination and Organization Studies
  2. Imagination and organization studies
  3. The Financial Environment of Layoffs
  4. Seeing faces, when faces can't be seen
  5. Slow convergence or no change at all?
  6. Tyranny of Intimacy / Richard Sennett
  7. Subjektivierung durch Normalisierung
  8. Sukzession als waldbauliches Prinzip
  9. Subjektivierung durch Normalisierung
  10. "Rote Sehnsucht rinnt in meinen Adern"
  11. Autoritäre Wende, populistische Wette
  12. Ein theoretischer Universalschlüssel?
  13. Democratization as Human Empowerment
  14. Betriebsklima und Unternehmenskultur
  15. Ungleichheit, Differenz und ‚Diversity’
  16. Ende des Sozialen? / End of the Social?
  17. Geschlechtsbewusste Gewaltprävention
  18. Waldnutzung und Waldschutz im Wandel
  19. Theories of Development of Democracy
  20. Do works councils inhibit investment?
  21. "Manchmal tut es weh, darüber zu reden..."
  22. Personal - Theorie, Politik, Gestaltung
  23. The 'Arab Spring' and the spiral model
  24. Niklas Luhmann und die Systemtheorie
  25. Die Strategie Integratives Gendering
  26. Einblicke in die Zukunft der Familie
  27. How General is Trust in "Most People" ?
  28. Umverteilung als Legitimationsproblem
  29. Heeft Pinokkio een Italiaans paspoort?
  30. Companies in the European Communities
  31. Erleuchtung II. Religionsphilosophisch
  32. The Rise of International Parliaments
  33. Öffentliche Nachhaltigkeitssteuerung
  34. Die Konstitutionsfunktion des Krieges
  35. Vom Alltagsphänomen zur Maturaaufgabe
  36. The theory of socio-cultural evolution
  37. Kompetenzorientierte Gruppenprüfungen
  38. Globale Vielzahl oder lokale Vielfalt
  39. Stanislaw Przybyszewski: Kommentarband
  40. Weber’s rationalism and modern society
  41. When back of pack meets front of pack
  42. Wo bleiben die Kinder im Kinderschutz?
  43. Low species diversity in beech forest
  44. Cabinets and Decision-Making Processes
  45. Politikberatung durch Bürgergutachten?
  46. Die Regierung der Migration in Europa.
  47. Doing Gender – Doing Space – Doing Body
  48. Organisationskultur und Innovativität
  49. How selfish are self-expression values?
  50. Human Capital Investments in Children