Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: A meta-analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care : A meta-analysis. / Seekles, W; Cuijpers, Pim; Kok, R et al.

in: Psychological Medicine, Jahrgang 43, Nr. 2, 02.2013, S. 351-361.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Seekles, W, Cuijpers, P, Kok, R, Beekman, ATF, Van Marwijk, HWJ & Van Straten, A 2013, 'Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: A meta-analysis', Psychological Medicine, Jg. 43, Nr. 2, S. 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712000670

APA

Seekles, W., Cuijpers, P., Kok, R., Beekman, A. T. F., Van Marwijk, H. W. J., & Van Straten, A. (2013). Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 43(2), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712000670

Vancouver

Seekles W, Cuijpers P, Kok R, Beekman ATF, Van Marwijk HWJ, Van Straten A. Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2013 Feb;43(2):351-361. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000670

Bibtex

@article{b999a5f26e48451086cce8345f409ac0,
title = "Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background Guidelines and mental healthcare models suggest the use of psychological treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care but systematic estimates of the effect sizes in primary care settings are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in primary care for anxiety disorders. Method The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Pubmed databases were searched in July 2010. Manuscripts describing psychological treatment for anxiety disorders/increased level of anxiety symptoms in primary care were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and if the psychological treatment was compared with a control group. Results In total, 1343 abstracts were identified. Of these, 12 manuscripts described an RCT comparing psychological treatment for anxiety with a control group in primary care. The pooled standardized effect size (12 comparisons) for reduced symptoms of anxiety at post-intervention was d = 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.84, p = 0.00, the number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.18]. Heterogeneity was significant among the studies (I 2 = 58.55, Q = 26.54, p < 0.01). The quality of studies was not optimal and missing aspects are summarized. Conclusions We found a moderate effect size for the psychological treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care. Several aspects of the treatment are related to effect size. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects given the chronicity and recurrent nature of anxiety.",
keywords = "Psychology, Health sciences, Anxiety, cognitive behaviour therapy, meta-analysis, primary care, psychological treatment",
author = "W Seekles and Pim Cuijpers and R Kok and Beekman, {Aartjan T.F.} and {Van Marwijk}, {Harm W J} and {Van Straten}, Annemieke",
year = "2013",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1017/S0033291712000670",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "351--361",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological treatment of anxiety in primary care

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Seekles, W

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Kok, R

AU - Beekman, Aartjan T.F.

AU - Van Marwijk, Harm W J

AU - Van Straten, Annemieke

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background Guidelines and mental healthcare models suggest the use of psychological treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care but systematic estimates of the effect sizes in primary care settings are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in primary care for anxiety disorders. Method The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Pubmed databases were searched in July 2010. Manuscripts describing psychological treatment for anxiety disorders/increased level of anxiety symptoms in primary care were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and if the psychological treatment was compared with a control group. Results In total, 1343 abstracts were identified. Of these, 12 manuscripts described an RCT comparing psychological treatment for anxiety with a control group in primary care. The pooled standardized effect size (12 comparisons) for reduced symptoms of anxiety at post-intervention was d = 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.84, p = 0.00, the number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.18]. Heterogeneity was significant among the studies (I 2 = 58.55, Q = 26.54, p < 0.01). The quality of studies was not optimal and missing aspects are summarized. Conclusions We found a moderate effect size for the psychological treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care. Several aspects of the treatment are related to effect size. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects given the chronicity and recurrent nature of anxiety.

AB - Background Guidelines and mental healthcare models suggest the use of psychological treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care but systematic estimates of the effect sizes in primary care settings are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in primary care for anxiety disorders. Method The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Pubmed databases were searched in July 2010. Manuscripts describing psychological treatment for anxiety disorders/increased level of anxiety symptoms in primary care were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and if the psychological treatment was compared with a control group. Results In total, 1343 abstracts were identified. Of these, 12 manuscripts described an RCT comparing psychological treatment for anxiety with a control group in primary care. The pooled standardized effect size (12 comparisons) for reduced symptoms of anxiety at post-intervention was d = 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.84, p = 0.00, the number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.18]. Heterogeneity was significant among the studies (I 2 = 58.55, Q = 26.54, p < 0.01). The quality of studies was not optimal and missing aspects are summarized. Conclusions We found a moderate effect size for the psychological treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care. Several aspects of the treatment are related to effect size. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects given the chronicity and recurrent nature of anxiety.

KW - Psychology

KW - Health sciences

KW - Anxiety

KW - cognitive behaviour therapy

KW - meta-analysis

KW - primary care

KW - psychological treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872100846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291712000670

DO - 10.1017/S0033291712000670

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 22717105

VL - 43

SP - 351

EP - 361

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 2

ER -

DOI