Pragmatismus und die Hoffnung auf Solidarität

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Pragmatismus und die Hoffnung auf Solidarität. / Dellwing, Michael.
in: Amerikastudien, Jahrgang 56, Nr. 2, 2011, S. 241-257.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cc477eb3ce9540ee8e076da2f134025e,
title = "Pragmatismus und die Hoffnung auf Solidarit{\"a}t",
abstract = "Durkheim's and Horkheimer's critiques of pragmatism have often been portrayed as misunderstandings. However, a pragmatist perspective contradicts itself if it claims that its opponents missed the 'true meaning of a text.' Reorienting the discussion towards ideas of truth is equally uninteresting for the pragmatist. The present paper wishes to frame the discussion around the concept of hope instead. For this purpose, the critiques of pragmatism are seen as 'foundationalist theory hope' and 'anti-foundationalist theory hope.' The paper offers a pragmatic concern with hope as a rebuttal.",
keywords = "Soziologie",
author = "Michael Dellwing",
year = "2011",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "56",
pages = "241--257",
journal = "Amerikastudien",
issn = "0340-2827",
publisher = "Winter Universit{\"a}tsverlag",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatismus und die Hoffnung auf Solidarität

AU - Dellwing, Michael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Durkheim's and Horkheimer's critiques of pragmatism have often been portrayed as misunderstandings. However, a pragmatist perspective contradicts itself if it claims that its opponents missed the 'true meaning of a text.' Reorienting the discussion towards ideas of truth is equally uninteresting for the pragmatist. The present paper wishes to frame the discussion around the concept of hope instead. For this purpose, the critiques of pragmatism are seen as 'foundationalist theory hope' and 'anti-foundationalist theory hope.' The paper offers a pragmatic concern with hope as a rebuttal.

AB - Durkheim's and Horkheimer's critiques of pragmatism have often been portrayed as misunderstandings. However, a pragmatist perspective contradicts itself if it claims that its opponents missed the 'true meaning of a text.' Reorienting the discussion towards ideas of truth is equally uninteresting for the pragmatist. The present paper wishes to frame the discussion around the concept of hope instead. For this purpose, the critiques of pragmatism are seen as 'foundationalist theory hope' and 'anti-foundationalist theory hope.' The paper offers a pragmatic concern with hope as a rebuttal.

KW - Soziologie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860858326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze

AN - SCOPUS:84860858326

VL - 56

SP - 241

EP - 257

JO - Amerikastudien

JF - Amerikastudien

SN - 0340-2827

IS - 2

ER -