Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action. / Bohn, Manuel; Frank, Michael C.
in: Open Mind, Jahrgang 9, 08.02.2025, S. 290-304.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bohn M, Frank MC. Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action. Open Mind. 2025 Feb 8;9:290-304. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00191

Bibtex

@article{e25c4919ab9b48de8eab3c2c5d41805c,
title = "Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action",
abstract = "Pragmatic inferences are based on assumptions about how speakers communicate: speakers are taken to be cooperative and rational; they consider alternatives and make intentional choices to produce maximally informative utterances. In principle, this analysis applies to linguistic but also non-linguistic communicative actions, but this prediction is typically only tested in children and not in more systematic implicature contexts. We test key implications of this view across six online experiments with American English speaking adults (total N = 231). Experiments 1A and 1B showed that participants made pragmatic inferences based on different types of communicative actions, some being non-linguistic. In Experiment 2, pragmatic inferences were found to be conditional on the speaker{\textquoteright}s epistemic states. Finally, Experiments 3A to 3C showed that pragmatic inferences were more likely to be made when the communicative action was produced intentionally. Taken together, these results strengthen the view that pragmatics includes social inference about cooperative communication over intentional actions, even non-linguistic actions.",
keywords = "communication, gesture, inference, pragmatics, Psychology",
author = "Manuel Bohn and Frank, {Michael C.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 Manuel Bohn and Michael C. Frank. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1162/opmi_a_00191",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "290--304",
journal = "Open Mind",
issn = "2470-2986",
publisher = "MIT Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatics as Social Inference About Intentional Action

AU - Bohn, Manuel

AU - Frank, Michael C.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Manuel Bohn and Michael C. Frank. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

PY - 2025/2/8

Y1 - 2025/2/8

N2 - Pragmatic inferences are based on assumptions about how speakers communicate: speakers are taken to be cooperative and rational; they consider alternatives and make intentional choices to produce maximally informative utterances. In principle, this analysis applies to linguistic but also non-linguistic communicative actions, but this prediction is typically only tested in children and not in more systematic implicature contexts. We test key implications of this view across six online experiments with American English speaking adults (total N = 231). Experiments 1A and 1B showed that participants made pragmatic inferences based on different types of communicative actions, some being non-linguistic. In Experiment 2, pragmatic inferences were found to be conditional on the speaker’s epistemic states. Finally, Experiments 3A to 3C showed that pragmatic inferences were more likely to be made when the communicative action was produced intentionally. Taken together, these results strengthen the view that pragmatics includes social inference about cooperative communication over intentional actions, even non-linguistic actions.

AB - Pragmatic inferences are based on assumptions about how speakers communicate: speakers are taken to be cooperative and rational; they consider alternatives and make intentional choices to produce maximally informative utterances. In principle, this analysis applies to linguistic but also non-linguistic communicative actions, but this prediction is typically only tested in children and not in more systematic implicature contexts. We test key implications of this view across six online experiments with American English speaking adults (total N = 231). Experiments 1A and 1B showed that participants made pragmatic inferences based on different types of communicative actions, some being non-linguistic. In Experiment 2, pragmatic inferences were found to be conditional on the speaker’s epistemic states. Finally, Experiments 3A to 3C showed that pragmatic inferences were more likely to be made when the communicative action was produced intentionally. Taken together, these results strengthen the view that pragmatics includes social inference about cooperative communication over intentional actions, even non-linguistic actions.

KW - communication

KW - gesture

KW - inference

KW - pragmatics

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105010274224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/opmi_a_00191

DO - 10.1162/opmi_a_00191

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 39995579

AN - SCOPUS:105010274224

VL - 9

SP - 290

EP - 304

JO - Open Mind

JF - Open Mind

SN - 2470-2986

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Vorwort
  2. Fehler beim Controlling
  3. Musik Computer Tanz
  4. ‚Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst‘
  5. Students' perspectives on wheelchair basketball in mainstream and special schools
  6. Nicht ducken - mucken
  7. Bewegte Spiele
  8. Umweltrechnungslegung in Südostasien
  9. Sensomotorisches Training mit Balanceschuhen
  10. The counter-revolution is really televised …
  11. Michel Foucault: Diskurs, Macht und Subjekt
  12. The Influence of Personality on Career Decisiveness of Business Students
  13. Spatial distribution models in a frugivorous carnivore, the stone marten (Martes foina)
  14. Osteuropakompetenz sichert Vorsprung
  15. Eucamaragnathus desenderi, a new ground beetle species from Africa (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
  16. Welcome to the (label) jungle? Analyzing how consumers deal with intra-sustainability label trade-offs on food
  17. Das Konzept
  18. BAuA-Working Time Survey (BAuA-WTS)
  19. Green in grey
  20. Fast Food Rap
  21. Kultur-Evolution: Partizipation und Nachhaltigkeit
  22. Prozessmanagement als Instrument für KMU
  23. Ärger in der Freundschaft
  24. BRANGE EFFECTS IN HEDONIC EVALUATION OF OLFACTORY STIMULI
  25. Crack propagation under bending in cast MglOGdxNd-T4 alloys
  26. Wie wirksam sind Laufbahnberatungen?
  27. Rapid Rise in the Groundwater after Heavy Rain
  28. Internal markets or hierachies
  29. Critical Stances
  30. Knowledge transfer in age-diverse coworker dyads in China and Germany
  31. Transdisciplinary institutionalization in higher education
  32. Arbeitskampf in diakonischen Einrichtungen?
  33. Inklusiver Fremdsprachenunterricht
  34. Multi-level Governance, Multi-level Deficits: The Case of Drinking Water Management in Hungary