Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda. / Ndayizeye, Gaelle; Kmoch, Laura; Baumann, Matthias et al.
in: Restoration Ecology, 2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ndayizeye G, Kmoch L, Baumann M, Nsengimana V, Fischer J, Plieninger T. Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda. Restoration Ecology. 2025. doi: 10.1111/rec.70217

Bibtex

@article{9b027ffa52304ef5b53caa131489fbe5,
title = "Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda",
abstract = "Introduction: Landscape restoration is critical to addressing deforestation, land degradation, and biodiversity loss while promoting human well-being. However, its success largely depends on local knowledge and values, which are often overlooked, reducing the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of restoration. Objectives: This study used a participatory approach to map landscape values and perceptions of well-being in Western Rwanda. The goal was to identify priority restoration areas, uncover potential conflicts, and explore the socio-demographic factors shaping landscape value perceptions within the context of restoration. Methods: A Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) survey was used to capture the landscape values and restoration practices' impact on local communities. Our analysis focused on understanding spatial and statistical variations in perceptions. Results: In total, 3,047 locations were identified, with regulating values, crop production, and benefits from trees most frequently mapped. Mapped values varied from site to site, reflecting local land use with regulating values, clustered around forests in Rutsiro, whereas in Nyabihu, they were mainly mapped on terraced farmlands. Socio-demographic factors influenced value perceptions, with landless respondents prioritizing crop production while wealthier landowners emphasized water supply. While restoration was generally viewed as beneficial, concerns were raised about the use of non-native species in restoration. These species were seen as potential threats, as they could reduce access to key resources, lower crop productivity, and disrupt cultural and traditional uses. Additionally, the same tree species perceived as harmful to livelihoods were also recognized for their negative impacts on biodiversity. Conclusions: Overall, the findings underscore the need to balance ecological goals with local socio-economic realities and demonstrate the value of PPGIS in participatory restoration planning.",
keywords = "landscape values, participatory mapping, PPGIS, Rwanda, social-ecological restoration, sustainable land management",
author = "Gaelle Ndayizeye and Laura Kmoch and Matthias Baumann and Venuste Nsengimana and Joern Fischer and Tobias Plieninger",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1111/rec.70217",
language = "English",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory mapping of local people's values in restoration landscapes in Western Rwanda

AU - Ndayizeye, Gaelle

AU - Kmoch, Laura

AU - Baumann, Matthias

AU - Nsengimana, Venuste

AU - Fischer, Joern

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Introduction: Landscape restoration is critical to addressing deforestation, land degradation, and biodiversity loss while promoting human well-being. However, its success largely depends on local knowledge and values, which are often overlooked, reducing the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of restoration. Objectives: This study used a participatory approach to map landscape values and perceptions of well-being in Western Rwanda. The goal was to identify priority restoration areas, uncover potential conflicts, and explore the socio-demographic factors shaping landscape value perceptions within the context of restoration. Methods: A Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) survey was used to capture the landscape values and restoration practices' impact on local communities. Our analysis focused on understanding spatial and statistical variations in perceptions. Results: In total, 3,047 locations were identified, with regulating values, crop production, and benefits from trees most frequently mapped. Mapped values varied from site to site, reflecting local land use with regulating values, clustered around forests in Rutsiro, whereas in Nyabihu, they were mainly mapped on terraced farmlands. Socio-demographic factors influenced value perceptions, with landless respondents prioritizing crop production while wealthier landowners emphasized water supply. While restoration was generally viewed as beneficial, concerns were raised about the use of non-native species in restoration. These species were seen as potential threats, as they could reduce access to key resources, lower crop productivity, and disrupt cultural and traditional uses. Additionally, the same tree species perceived as harmful to livelihoods were also recognized for their negative impacts on biodiversity. Conclusions: Overall, the findings underscore the need to balance ecological goals with local socio-economic realities and demonstrate the value of PPGIS in participatory restoration planning.

AB - Introduction: Landscape restoration is critical to addressing deforestation, land degradation, and biodiversity loss while promoting human well-being. However, its success largely depends on local knowledge and values, which are often overlooked, reducing the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of restoration. Objectives: This study used a participatory approach to map landscape values and perceptions of well-being in Western Rwanda. The goal was to identify priority restoration areas, uncover potential conflicts, and explore the socio-demographic factors shaping landscape value perceptions within the context of restoration. Methods: A Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) survey was used to capture the landscape values and restoration practices' impact on local communities. Our analysis focused on understanding spatial and statistical variations in perceptions. Results: In total, 3,047 locations were identified, with regulating values, crop production, and benefits from trees most frequently mapped. Mapped values varied from site to site, reflecting local land use with regulating values, clustered around forests in Rutsiro, whereas in Nyabihu, they were mainly mapped on terraced farmlands. Socio-demographic factors influenced value perceptions, with landless respondents prioritizing crop production while wealthier landowners emphasized water supply. While restoration was generally viewed as beneficial, concerns were raised about the use of non-native species in restoration. These species were seen as potential threats, as they could reduce access to key resources, lower crop productivity, and disrupt cultural and traditional uses. Additionally, the same tree species perceived as harmful to livelihoods were also recognized for their negative impacts on biodiversity. Conclusions: Overall, the findings underscore the need to balance ecological goals with local socio-economic realities and demonstrate the value of PPGIS in participatory restoration planning.

KW - landscape values

KW - participatory mapping

KW - PPGIS

KW - Rwanda

KW - social-ecological restoration

KW - sustainable land management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105018612580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.70217

DO - 10.1111/rec.70217

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:105018612580

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

ER -

DOI