Normative Balance and Electoral Reform: A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Normative Balance and Electoral Reform: A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis. / Ganghof, Steffen; Eppner, Sebastian ; Heeß, Katja.
in: West European Politics, Jahrgang 38, Nr. 1, 25.01.2015, S. 53-72.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ganghof S, Eppner S, Heeß K. Normative Balance and Electoral Reform: A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis. West European Politics. 2015 Jan 25;38(1):53-72. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.929342

Bibtex

@article{8383c78f2f8347ce8b1c0207e6601931,
title = "Normative Balance and Electoral Reform: A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "The Finnish electoral system has recently been changed to slightly increase proportionality, but nothing has been done to make cabinet alternatives more {\textquoteleft}identifiable{\textquoteright} before the election. This outcome poses a major puzzle for one important theoretical approach to electoral system change. This approach sees normatively {\textquoteleft}unbalanced{\textquoteright} systems as vulnerable to reform and would have expected a significant increase in the pre-electoral identifiability of competing cabinet options. The article explains the Finnish case by embedding it in a comparative model of normative tradeoffs in democratic design. Based on Finnish case evidence and a statistical analysis of 100 elections in 32 democracies (from 2001 to 2011), the article argues that the type of democracy exemplified by Finland is not normatively unbalanced. In particular, the lack of pre-electoral identifiability is compensated for by an unconstrained multidimensionality of partisan preferences. While it may be true that normatively balanced designs are more stable, there is more than one way to be balanced.",
keywords = "Politics, Finland, Electoral reform",
author = "Steffen Ganghof and Sebastian Eppner and Katja Hee{\ss}",
note = "An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association Conference in Barcelona in June 2013. We thank the participants in the panel on Regime Authority, and especially our discussant Adrienne LeBas, for helpful comments. The research for this paper was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant number GA 1696/2-1.",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2014.929342",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "53--72",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative Balance and Electoral Reform

T2 - A Finnish Puzzle and a Comparative Analysis

AU - Ganghof, Steffen

AU - Eppner, Sebastian

AU - Heeß, Katja

N1 - An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association Conference in Barcelona in June 2013. We thank the participants in the panel on Regime Authority, and especially our discussant Adrienne LeBas, for helpful comments. The research for this paper was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant number GA 1696/2-1.

PY - 2015/1/25

Y1 - 2015/1/25

N2 - The Finnish electoral system has recently been changed to slightly increase proportionality, but nothing has been done to make cabinet alternatives more ‘identifiable’ before the election. This outcome poses a major puzzle for one important theoretical approach to electoral system change. This approach sees normatively ‘unbalanced’ systems as vulnerable to reform and would have expected a significant increase in the pre-electoral identifiability of competing cabinet options. The article explains the Finnish case by embedding it in a comparative model of normative tradeoffs in democratic design. Based on Finnish case evidence and a statistical analysis of 100 elections in 32 democracies (from 2001 to 2011), the article argues that the type of democracy exemplified by Finland is not normatively unbalanced. In particular, the lack of pre-electoral identifiability is compensated for by an unconstrained multidimensionality of partisan preferences. While it may be true that normatively balanced designs are more stable, there is more than one way to be balanced.

AB - The Finnish electoral system has recently been changed to slightly increase proportionality, but nothing has been done to make cabinet alternatives more ‘identifiable’ before the election. This outcome poses a major puzzle for one important theoretical approach to electoral system change. This approach sees normatively ‘unbalanced’ systems as vulnerable to reform and would have expected a significant increase in the pre-electoral identifiability of competing cabinet options. The article explains the Finnish case by embedding it in a comparative model of normative tradeoffs in democratic design. Based on Finnish case evidence and a statistical analysis of 100 elections in 32 democracies (from 2001 to 2011), the article argues that the type of democracy exemplified by Finland is not normatively unbalanced. In particular, the lack of pre-electoral identifiability is compensated for by an unconstrained multidimensionality of partisan preferences. While it may be true that normatively balanced designs are more stable, there is more than one way to be balanced.

KW - Politics

KW - Finland

KW - Electoral reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908070206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2014.929342

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2014.929342

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 38

SP - 53

EP - 72

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Organisationen

  1. Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit

Publikationen

  1. Die Erweiterung der Ökodesign-Richtlinie - auf dem Weg zur "Super-Umweltrichtlinie"?
  2. Die Kunst in der konnexionistischen Welt
  3. Gute gesunde Schule
  4. Ageing
  5. Live spielen
  6. Caroline Struchholz: Geflüchtete im deutschen Hochschulsystem
  7. Gesellschaftliche Funktionen von Museen zwischen Assimilation und Akkommodation
  8. Erfolgreicher dank Qualifikation und Mentoring?
  9. Evaluation der Ergebnisqualität des besonderen Heilverfahrens der Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung
  10. The Influence of Personality on Students‘ Career Decisiveness – A Comparison between Chinese and German Economics and Management Student
  11. Das Wesen totaler Herrschaft
  12. Remote sensing of bush encroachment on commercial cattle farms in semi-arid rangelands in Namibia
  13. Microeconomic Consequences of Exemptions from Value Added Taxation – The Case of Deutsche Post
  14. Edutainment in sustainability
  15. Wirtschaftsrecht an Fachhochschulen
  16. Are the Rural Electrification Efforts in the Ecuadorian Amazon Sustainable?
  17. Spin-off Gründungen in der Wohlfahrtspflege
  18. Kybernetische Biopolitik
  19. The Sustainability Balanced Scorcard and venture capital ownership
  20. Kindertheologie und schulische Alltagspraxis
  21. Über Hinterbühnen und Fauxpas
  22. Das berufsbegleitende Studium als Personalentwicklungsinstrument? Die Rolle der Transfermotivation
  23. Greek cities in crisis
  24. Transdisziplinäre Forschung
  25. White-Indian Relations
  26. The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity—Methods and Policy Applications, Paulo A.L.D. Nunes, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, Peter Nijkamp, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2003), 165 pp., ISBN: 1-84376 270-6
  27. Mit psychischer Gesundheit zur guten Ganztagsschule
  28. § 844 Ersatzansprüche Dritter bei Tötung
  29. Planetary carambolage: The evolutionary political economy of technology, nature and work
  30. Fahrten & Fährten: Zur Kamera in Eric Hattans Videoräumen
  31. Ohne Ministerium keine Wende