Multifractality Versus (Mono-) Fractality as Evidence of Nonlinear Interactions Across Timescales: Disentangling the Belief in Nonlinearity From the Diagnosis of Nonlinearity in Empirical Data

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Multifractality Versus (Mono-) Fractality as Evidence of Nonlinear Interactions Across Timescales: Disentangling the Belief in Nonlinearity From the Diagnosis of Nonlinearity in Empirical Data. / Kelty-Stephen, Damian G.; Wallot, Sebastian.
in: Ecological Psychology, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 4, 02.10.2017, S. 259-299.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3d5f89553ff24e33bfbd1243f4a6e6e9,
title = "Multifractality Versus (Mono-) Fractality as Evidence of Nonlinear Interactions Across Timescales: Disentangling the Belief in Nonlinearity From the Diagnosis of Nonlinearity in Empirical Data",
abstract = "This article addresses the still popular but incorrect idea that monofractal (sometimes called “fractal” for short) structure might be a definitive signature of nonlinearity and, as a corollary, that monofractal analyses are nonlinear analyses. That this point (i.e., “fractal = nonlinear”) is incorrect remains novel to many readers. We suspect that unfamiliarity with autocorrelation has helped eclipse the linearity of fractal structure from more popular appreciation. In this article, in order to explain the linear nature of monofractality and its difference from multifractality, we present an introduction to the autocorrelation function and review short-lag memory, nonstationary motions, and the intermediary set of fractionally integrated processes that conventional fractal analyses quantify. Understanding from our own experiences how surprising the linearity of fractals is to accept, we attempt to make our points clear with as much graphic depiction as math. We hope to share our own experiences in struggling with this potentially strange-sounding idea that, really, monofractals are linear while at the same time contrasting them to multifractals that can indicate nonlinearity.",
keywords = "Empirical education research, Psychology",
author = "Kelty-Stephen, {Damian G.} and Sebastian Wallot",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10407413.2017.1368355",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "259--299",
journal = "Ecological Psychology",
issn = "1040-7413",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multifractality Versus (Mono-) Fractality as Evidence of Nonlinear Interactions Across Timescales

T2 - Disentangling the Belief in Nonlinearity From the Diagnosis of Nonlinearity in Empirical Data

AU - Kelty-Stephen, Damian G.

AU - Wallot, Sebastian

PY - 2017/10/2

Y1 - 2017/10/2

N2 - This article addresses the still popular but incorrect idea that monofractal (sometimes called “fractal” for short) structure might be a definitive signature of nonlinearity and, as a corollary, that monofractal analyses are nonlinear analyses. That this point (i.e., “fractal = nonlinear”) is incorrect remains novel to many readers. We suspect that unfamiliarity with autocorrelation has helped eclipse the linearity of fractal structure from more popular appreciation. In this article, in order to explain the linear nature of monofractality and its difference from multifractality, we present an introduction to the autocorrelation function and review short-lag memory, nonstationary motions, and the intermediary set of fractionally integrated processes that conventional fractal analyses quantify. Understanding from our own experiences how surprising the linearity of fractals is to accept, we attempt to make our points clear with as much graphic depiction as math. We hope to share our own experiences in struggling with this potentially strange-sounding idea that, really, monofractals are linear while at the same time contrasting them to multifractals that can indicate nonlinearity.

AB - This article addresses the still popular but incorrect idea that monofractal (sometimes called “fractal” for short) structure might be a definitive signature of nonlinearity and, as a corollary, that monofractal analyses are nonlinear analyses. That this point (i.e., “fractal = nonlinear”) is incorrect remains novel to many readers. We suspect that unfamiliarity with autocorrelation has helped eclipse the linearity of fractal structure from more popular appreciation. In this article, in order to explain the linear nature of monofractality and its difference from multifractality, we present an introduction to the autocorrelation function and review short-lag memory, nonstationary motions, and the intermediary set of fractionally integrated processes that conventional fractal analyses quantify. Understanding from our own experiences how surprising the linearity of fractals is to accept, we attempt to make our points clear with as much graphic depiction as math. We hope to share our own experiences in struggling with this potentially strange-sounding idea that, really, monofractals are linear while at the same time contrasting them to multifractals that can indicate nonlinearity.

KW - Empirical education research

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028732179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10407413.2017.1368355

DO - 10.1080/10407413.2017.1368355

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85028732179

VL - 29

SP - 259

EP - 299

JO - Ecological Psychology

JF - Ecological Psychology

SN - 1040-7413

IS - 4

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Functionality or Aesthetics?
  2. Locus of control
  3. Green your community click by click
  4. Friedenspraxis
  5. Learning Analytics and Personalized Learning
  6. Doing everything you can, but not (yet) getting it right
  7. Analysing clickstream data
  8. Credit constraints, idiosyncratic risks, and the wealth ditribution in a heterogeneous agent model
  9. Introduction to General Ecology
  10. Crossing borders
  11. Performability analysis of an unreliable M/M/1-type queue
  12. Introduction: Queer Theory after "Marriage Equality"
  13. Variation in short-term and long-term responses of photosynthesis and isoprenoid-mediated photoprotection to soil water availability in four Douglas-fir provenances
  14. Methoden-Muster: Partizipation und Verhandlung
  15. Introduction: From Dada Tricks to Post-Truth Politics
  16. From the plurality of transdisciplinarity to concrete transdisciplinary methods
  17. Formative Assessment in Mathematics Instruction
  18. Diagnosebegleiter - Einzeltestkartei
  19. Feature selection for density level-sets
  20. Self-regulated learning and self assessment in online mathematics bridging courses
  21. Silent reading fluency and comprehension in bilingual children
  22. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  23. Mythos "Stunde Null"
  24. Ereignis
  25. [U]topische Körper in der Adoleszenz
  26. Musical Interface Agendas. Musical Appropriation via Technological Pre-configuration
  27. Boosting and sustaining passion
  28. Frank Fischer/Herbert Gottweis (Hg.) The Argumentative Turn Revisited.
  29. Vorräte - Schätzung des Fertigstellungsgrades bei der Percentage of Completion Methode
  30. The Return of History - An Exchange between Christoph Behnke, Cornelia Kastelan, and Ulf Wuggenig
  31. Hydration and Dehydration of CaO/ Ca(OH)2 and CaCl2 / CaCl2 * 6 H2O– TGA/ DSC studies
  32. Structure matters
  33. Influence of strontium, silicon and calcium additions on the properties of the AM50 alloy
  34. Frontiers of Democracy (Special Issue)
  35. Evaluierung medizinischer Volumenrendering-Algorithmen durch empirische Studien
  36. Peer Evaluation Can Reliably Measure Local Knowledge
  37. 303, MPC, A/D
  38. Comparing U.S. and German Cost Accounting Methods
  39. Social movements in defense of public water services
  40. The Role of Linked Social-Ecological Systems in a Mobile Agent-Based Ecosystem Service from Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) in an Indigenous Community Forest in Palawan, Philippines